为啥都要读书不要创业投资?按说新移民都有钱投资的,新老移民都来谈谈为啥你们宁愿坐吃山空也不愿意投资加拿大呢?

为啥都要读书不要创业投资?按说新移民都有钱投资的,新老移民都来谈谈为啥你们宁愿坐吃山空也不愿意投资加拿大呢?

  • 语言不好不想折腾

    选票: 9 18.8%
  • 没有投资经验

    选票: 14 29.2%
  • 加拿大税太高,高得没有动力创业

    选票: 12 25.0%
  • 年过四十了就想三十亩地一头牛,老婆孩子热炕头

    选票: 12 25.0%
  • 习惯了朝九晚五的上班日子,准时打卡准点下班

    选票: 6 12.5%
  • 胆小怕亏损

    选票: 18 37.5%
  • 不想太劳累,吃上加拿大的福利再用点自己国内的积蓄也比创业强

    选票: 10 20.8%
  • 老了来加拿大是来享受生活的

    选票: 7 14.6%
  • 专业炒股炒汇赚点生活费就好

    选票: 3 6.3%
  • 已经在创业并且正在闷声发大财了,实现财务自由指日可待

    选票: 2 4.2%

  • 全部投票
    48
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
这边税太高 合理避税作为人生地不熟的移民没有特别多的信心 怕惹麻烦。所以买点房产 免税账户折腾折腾得了 找个工作还是踏实 至少不至于哪天被税局盯上。

自雇可以合理规避很多税。。反而上班打税是“实打实”的
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
是的,我现在所接触的行业基本都是从中国,或者菲律宾进口来的。要想利用好资源得首先得要知道从哪找这些资源

1688网上找东西,有一些专业行业有专业网站,不行还有广交会,难题是怎么卖,找还不容易啊
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
我创业在中国也没搞成, 累得半死。在国外也就做一些房产和股票投资, 创业目前是放弃了。我主要是做高科技和工业技术的, 高科技这部分连中国BAT都在这里都没戏。 就一些印度人在美国还行, 主要事他们business和语言占了优势。传统工业门槛更高, 更不好做。
感谢TG(NND), 我们新中国出来的人, 在语言和文化上天生劣势。 在本地做什么都费劲。 不过事在人为, 创业主要还是要发挥长出。 现在就是中国和美国加拿大之间是有机会的。个人感觉还是要做这种桥梁才有戏。
本地创业只有中餐 和服务, 还有老鼠会。 除了这几种本人都不看好。 :wdb30:
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
陪伴孩子真的很不错,不过我有点贪心, 我就想边儿上有一个人帮我照看着, 这边自己也能顾着事业,简单说家庭事业两不误是我觉得最理想的状态:

1) 因为照顾孩子太全身心了, 失去了自己再回到社会的能力,也是一种不好的状态吧,母亲的一种状态很可能影射到孩子身上,如果母亲在事业上有所作为, 孩子也会感到挺骄傲的吧,反之,如果母亲除了能照顾孩子的起居和学习外什么也干不了, 那么等他长大后, 母亲失去了这个作用, 孩子又会怎么看待母亲呢?

什么乱七八糟的。
我说了,在大中国,90% 的人是这么认为的,因为从小被单一的世界观教育洗脑了。 在世界的其他地方,价值取向多样化。我目测你这样思维的不超过20%。

我转一篇 有关常春藤校毕业女生的职业选择,你看看人家的思路。

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/20/us/many-women-at-elite-colleges-set-career-path-to-motherhood.html

Many Women at Elite Colleges Set Career Path to Motherhood

Cynthia Liu is precisely the kind of high achiever Yale wants: smart (1510 SAT), disciplined (4.0 grade point average), competitive (finalist in Texas oratory competition), musical (pianist), athletic (runner) and altruistic (hospital volunteer). And at the start of her sophomore year at Yale, Ms. Liu is full of ambition, planning to go to law school.

So will she join the long tradition of famous Ivy League graduates? Not likely. By the time she is 30, this accomplished 19-year-old expects to be a stay-at-home mom.

"My mother's always told me you can't be the best career woman and the best mother at the same time," Ms. Liu said matter-of-factly. "You always have to choose one over the other."

At Yale and other top colleges, women are being groomed to take their place in an ever more diverse professional elite. It is almost taken for granted that, just as they make up half the students at these institutions, they will move into leadership roles on an equal basis with their male classmates.

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story
There is just one problem with this scenario: many of these women say that is not what they want.

Many women at the nation's most elite colleges say they have already decided that they will put aside their careers in favor of raising children. Though some of these students are not planning to have children and some hope to have a family and work full time, many others, like Ms. Liu, say they will happily play a traditional female role, with motherhood their main commitment.

Continue reading the main story


[Some readers have asked about the reporting that went into this article. The reporter, Louise Story, explains in a separate article published Sept. 23.]

Much attention has been focused on career women who leave the work force to rear children. What seems to be changing is that while many women in college two or three decades ago expected to have full-time careers, their daughters, while still in college, say they have already decided to suspend or end their careers when they have children.

"At the height of the women's movement and shortly thereafter, women were much more firm in their expectation that they could somehow combine full-time work with child rearing," said Cynthia E. Russett, a professor of American history who has taught at Yale since 1967. "The women today are, in effect, turning realistic."

Dr. Russett is among more than a dozen faculty members and administrators at the most exclusive institutions who have been on campus for decades and who said in interviews that they had noticed the changing attitude.

Many students say staying home is not a shocking idea among their friends. Shannon Flynn, an 18-year-old from Guilford, Conn., who is a freshman at Harvard, says many of her girlfriends do not want to work full time.

"Most probably do feel like me, maybe even tending toward wanting to not work at all," said Ms. Flynn, who plans to work part time after having children, though she is torn because she has worked so hard in school.

"Men really aren't put in that position," she said.

Uzezi Abugo, a freshman at the University of Pennsylvania who hopes to become a lawyer, says she, too, wants to be home with her children at least until they are in school.


Continue reading the main story
"I've seen the difference between kids who did have their mother stay at home and kids who didn't, and it's kind of like an obvious difference when you look at it," said Ms. Abugo, whose mother, a nurse, stayed home until Ms. Abugo was in first grade.

While the changing attitudes are difficult to quantify, the shift emerges repeatedly in interviews with Ivy League students, including 138 freshman and senior females at Yale who replied to e-mail questions sent to members of two residential colleges over the last school year.

The interviews found that 85 of the students, or roughly 60 percent, said that when they had children, they planned to cut back on work or stop working entirely. About half of those women said they planned to work part time, and about half wanted to stop work for at least a few years.

Two of the women interviewed said they expected their husbands to stay home with the children while they pursued their careers. Two others said either they or their husbands would stay home, depending on whose career was furthest along.

The women said that pursuing a rigorous college education was worth the time and money because it would help position them to work in meaningful part-time jobs when their children are young or to attain good jobs when their children leave home.

In recent years, elite colleges have emphasized the important roles they expect their alumni - both men and women - to play in society.

For example, earlier this month, Shirley M. Tilghman, the president of Princeton University, welcomed new freshmen, saying: "The goal of a Princeton education is to prepare young men and women to take up positions of leadership in the 21st century. Of course, the word 'leadership' conjures up images of presidents and C.E.O.'s, but I want to stress that my idea of a leader is much broader than that."

She listed education, medicine and engineering as other areas where students could become leaders.

In an e-mail response to a question, Dr. Tilghman added: "There is nothing inconsistent with being a leader and a stay-at-home parent. Some women (and a handful of men) whom I have known who have done this have had a powerful impact on their communities."


Continue reading the main story
Yet the likelihood that so many young women plan to opt out of high-powered careers presents a conundrum.

"It really does raise this question for all of us and for the country: when we work so hard to open academics and other opportunities for women, what kind of return do we expect to get for that?" said Marlyn McGrath Lewis, director of undergraduate admissions at Harvard, who served as dean for coeducation in the late 1970's and early 1980's.

It is a complicated issue and one that most schools have not addressed. The women they are counting on to lead society are likely to marry men who will make enough money to give them a real choice about whether to be full-time mothers, unlike those women who must work out of economic necessity.

It is less than clear what universities should, or could, do about it. For one, a person's expectations at age 18 are less than perfect predictors of their life choices 10 years later. And in any case, admissions officers are not likely to ask applicants whether they plan to become stay-at-home moms.

University officials said that success meant different things to different people and that universities were trying to broaden students' minds, not simply prepare them for jobs.

"What does concern me," said Peter Salovey, the dean of Yale College, "is that so few students seem to be able to think outside the box; so few students seem to be able to imagine a life for themselves that isn't constructed along traditional gender roles."

There is, of course, nothing new about women being more likely than men to stay home to rear children.

According to a 2000 survey of Yale alumni from the classes of 1979, 1984, 1989 and 1994, conducted by the Yale Office of Institutional Research, more men from each of those classes than women said that work was their primary activity - a gap that was small among alumni in their 20's but widened as women moved into their prime child-rearing years. Among the alumni surveyed who had reached their 40's, only 56 percent of the women still worked, compared with 90 percent of the men.


Continue reading the main story
A 2005 study of comparable Yale alumni classes found that the pattern had not changed. Among the alumni who had reached their early 40's, just over half said work was their primary activity, compared with 90 percent of the men. Among the women who had reached their late 40's, some said they had returned to work, but the percentage of women working was still far behind the percentage of men.

A 2001 survey of Harvard Business School graduates found that 31 percent of the women from the classes of 1981, 1985 and 1991 who answered the survey worked only part time or on contract, and another 31 percent did not work at all, levels strikingly similar to the percentages of the Yale students interviewed who predicted they would stay at home or work part time in their 30's and 40's.

What seems new is that while many of their mothers expected to have hard-charging careers, then scaled back their professional plans only after having children, the women of this generation expect their careers to take second place to child rearing.

"It never occurred to me," Rebecca W. Bushnell, dean of the School of Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania, said about working versus raising children. "Thirty years ago when I was heading out, I guess I was just taking it one step at a time."

Dr. Bushnell said young women today, in contrast, are thinking and talking about part-time or flexible work options for when they have children. "People have a heightened awareness of trying to get the right balance between work and family."

Sarah Currie, a senior at Harvard, said many of the men in her American Family class last fall approved of women's plans to stay home with their children.

"A lot of the guys were like, 'I think that's really great,' " Ms. Currie said. "One of the guys was like, 'I think that's sexy.' Staying at home with your children isn't as polarizing of an issue as I envision it is for women who are in their 30's now."

For most of the young women who responded to e-mail questions, a major factor shaping their attitudes seemed to be their experience with their own mothers, about three out of five of whom did not work at all, took several years off or worked only part time.


Continue reading the main story
"My stepmom's very proud of my choice because it makes her feel more valuable," said Kellie Zesch, a Texan who graduated from the University of North Carolina two years ago and who said that once she had children, she intended to stay home for at least five years and then consider working part time. "It justified it to her, that I don't look down on her for not having a career."

Similarly, students who are committed to full-time careers, without breaks, also cited their mothers as influences. Laura Sullivan, a sophomore at Yale who wants to be a lawyer, called her mother's choice to work full time the "greatest gift."

"She showed me what it meant to be an amazing mother and maintain a career," Ms. Sullivan said.

Some of these women's mothers, who said they did not think about these issues so early in their lives, said they were surprised to hear that their college-age daughters had already formed their plans.

Emily Lechner, one of Ms. Liu's roommates, hopes to stay home a few years, then work part time as a lawyer once her children are in school.

Her mother, Carol, who once thought she would have a full-time career but gave it up when her children were born, was pleasantly surprised to hear that. "I do have this bias that the parents can do it best," she said. "I see a lot of women in their 30's who have full-time nannies, and I just question if their kids are getting the best."

For many feminists, it may come as a shock to hear how unbothered many young women at the nation's top schools are by the strictures of traditional roles.

"They are still thinking of this as a private issue; they're accepting it," said Laura Wexler, a professor of American studies and women's and gender studies at Yale. "Women have been given full-time working career opportunities and encouragement with no social changes to support it.

"I really believed 25 years ago," Dr. Wexler added, "that this would be solved by now."

Angie Ku, another of Ms. Liu's roommates who had a stay-at-home mom, talks nonchalantly about attending law or business school, having perhaps a 10-year career and then staying home with her children.


Continue reading the main story
"Parents have such an influence on their children," Ms. Ku said. "I want to have that influence. Me!"

She said she did not mind if that limited her career potential.

"I'll have a career until I have two kids," she said. "It doesn't necessarily matter how far you get. It's kind of like the experience: I have tried what I wanted to do."

Ms. Ku added that she did not think it was a problem that women usually do most of the work raising kids.

"I accept things how they are," she said. "I don't mind the status quo. I don't see why I have to go against it."

After all, she added, those roles got her where she is.

"It worked so well for me," she said, "and I don't see in my life why it wouldn't work."
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
她是成功的网购人士,就是把 MADE IN CHINA 的东西倒向全世界。

1688网上找东西,有一些专业行业有专业网站,不行还有广交会,难题是怎么卖,找还不容易啊

只要价格有优势,如果是食品方面的话,保质期长,不愁卖
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
应该说在这样的一个市场氛围里, 也许创业反而显得更容易些了,可以把市场扩大出去,做得好的一般都不只是在加拿大境内做的吧。

问题是主要客户群不瞄准加拿大,我为什么要把公司放在加拿大?这里是有税务优势,成本优势,还是有人才优势呢?温哥华和多伦多的大学不错,所以IT和电子业算是有点人才优势。温哥华的文创设计产业也不错,很有些国际知名时尚品牌,不过竞争也比较激烈了,而且这个是需要高前期投入的。也许还有其他的切入点,我也在寻找。
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
我创业在中国也没搞成, 累得半死。在国外也就做一些房产和股票投资, 创业目前是放弃了。我主要是做高科技和工业技术的, 高科技这部分连中国BAT都在这里都没戏。 就一些印度人在美国还行, 主要事他们business和语言占了优势。传统工业门槛更高, 更不好做。
感谢TG(NND), 我们新中国出来的人, 在语言和文化上天生劣势。 在本地做什么都费劲。 不过事在人为, 创业主要还是要发挥长出。 现在就是中国和美国加拿大之间是有机会的。个人感觉还是要做这种桥梁才有戏。
本地创业只有中餐 和服务, 还有老鼠会。 除了这几种本人都不看好。 :wdb30:
中餐要能有特色菜才开得起来,如果是要自己当服务员的那还是算了,累死
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
问题是主要客户群不瞄准加拿大,我为什么要把公司放在加拿大?这里是有税务优势,成本优势,还是有人才优势呢?温哥华和多伦多的大学不错,所以IT和电子业算是有点人才优势。温哥华的文创设计产业也不错,很有些国际知名时尚品牌,不过竞争也比较激烈了,而且这个是需要高前期投入的。也许还有其他的切入点,我也在寻找。

你人在加拿大, 就得在加拿大这里运营啊,这不是很简单的道理吗?如果你还想在中国运营, 那你跑加拿大来干嘛来了?

在加拿大运营还是有优势的, 比如你产品卖到美国去不要缴美国的gst,你可以利用中国的身份做美国的生意,但是你人在加拿大, 还是有优势的。
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
问题是主要客户群不瞄准加拿大,我为什么要把公司放在加拿大?这里是有税务优势,成本优势,还是有人才优势呢?温哥华和多伦多的大学不错,所以IT和电子业算是有点人才优势。温哥华的文创设计产业也不错,很有些国际知名时尚品牌,不过竞争也比较激烈了,而且这个是需要高前期投入的。也许还有其他的切入点,我也在寻找。
留学生服务,深度深不可测。
 

Similar threads

家园推荐黄页

家园币系统数据

家园币池子报价
家园币最新成交价
家园币总发行量
加元现金总量
家园币总成交量
家园币总成交价值

池子家园币总量
池子加元现金总量
池子币总量
1池子币现价
池子家园币总手续费
池子加元总手续费
入池家园币年化收益率
入池加元年化收益率

微比特币最新报价
毫以太币最新报价
微比特币总量
毫以太币总量
家园币储备总净值
家园币比特币储备
家园币以太币储备
比特币的加元报价
以太币的加元报价
USDT的加元报价

交易币种/月度交易量
家园币
加元交易对(比特币等)
USDT交易对(比特币等)
顶部