用脚后跟想想吧；
真是有危害性的核废料及废水；
日本真能排入自己周围海域？
这就是典型的左棍的Fake news；
这几天不少中文媒体报道
日本计划将110万吨核废水倒入大海，听起来是不是很气愤？
但这些中文报道基本都忽略了几个重要信息：
1.这些废水都经过了处理，放射性元素基本都过滤掉了，里面只有氘，而氘并不具有放射性；
2.日本和国际原子能机构反复沟通过，国际原子能机构认可日本处理的方案；
3.当年美国三里岛事故发生后，产生的核废水经过处理后也是倒入大海；
4.含氘废水在正常运行的核电站中也有，处理方式一般也是倒入大海。
日本的排放计划是经过处理和长时间储存衰减后才提上日程，属于非常谨慎的了。
对这一方案比较反对的主要是福岛一带的渔民，他们属于利益受损方，福岛事故后直到现在，那一带的捕鱼都没有恢复。如果排放的话，从现在开始至少需要四五年才能完成，本地渔业的恢复会大大延迟。
当然这都属于正常的声音。但如果只是有选择地将这些反对声音收集在一起，有意忽略更重要的信息，让读者产生“哎呀日本政府真不是东西，这是要辐射全世界呀”，这就不太好了。
我个人的经验是，对这类新闻的中文报道要格外小心。
另外，对散布这样中文报道的人也要格外小心
部分文字摘自：
现在中文媒体各种意识形态和政治宣传无孔不入，大家还是看看客观的英文媒体之后洗洗睡吧:
From wikipedia "Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster" page, under "Contaminated water" Section:
en.wikipedia.org
"As of October 2019, 1.17 million cubic meters of contaminated water was stored in the plant area. The water is
being treated by a purification system that can remove radionuclides, except tritium, to a level that Japanese regulations allow to be discharged to the sea. As of December 2019, 28% of the water had been purified to the required level, while the remaining 72% needed additional purification. However, tritium cannot be separated from the water. As of October 2019, the total amount of tritium in the water was about 856
terabecquerels, and the average tritium concentration was about 0.73 megabecquerels per liter. A committee set up by the Japanese Government concluded that the purified water should be released to the sea or evaporated to the atmosphere. The committee calculated that
discharging all the water to the sea in one year would cause a radiation dose of 0.81 microsieverts to the local people, whereas evaporation would cause 1.2 microsieverts. For comparison, Japanese people get 2100 microsieverts per year from natural radiation.[230] IAEA considers that the dose calculation method is appropriate. Further, IAEA recommends that a decision on the water disposal must be made urgently.[231] Despite the negligible doses, the Japanese committee is concerned that the water disposal may cause
reputational damage to the prefecture, especially to the fishing industry and tourism.
[230] "
