刚刚为了回一个贴，了解了一个案子，
这次大选真的长知识，
Benford 理论，统计学，计算机学，历史，法律，大学都没学这么用功
更别提信息辨别能力，筛选能力，综合分析能力，等等等等的锻炼
感慨一下。。。。
浏览附件RfF0UMle8Pkx_Ace.mp4
这次大选真的长知识，
Benford 理论，统计学，计算机学，历史，法律，大学都没学这么用功
更别提信息辨别能力，筛选能力，综合分析能力，等等等等的锻炼
感慨一下。。。。
浏览附件1GzEuMtQvnR0_WbU.mp4看案子，一定要去了解案子打的是什么内容，整体去了解一下，不要断章取义的去看几句话
我去了解了一下这个案子，原来是在打这个，
The case focuses on 592 ballots that have not been counted
The Trump campaign claimed that the Montgomery Board of Elections refused to abide legal requirements for canvassing and counting mail-in ballots “for which outer declaration envelope is not completed filled in with the elector’s signature, address and/or date of execution.”
如果了解了案子打的是什么内容，就知道律师为啥会这么说了，到了法庭，一切必须严谨
这个小案子本身就没有打Fraud，
THE COURT: In your petition, which is right before me — and I read it several times — you don’t claim that any electors or the Board of the County were guilty of fraud, correct? That’s correct?
MR. GOLDSTEIN: Your Honor, accusing people of fraud is a pretty big step. And it is rare that I call somebody a liar, and I am not calling the Board of the DNC or anybody else involved in this a liar. Everybody is coming to this with good faith. The DNC is coming with good faith. We’re all just trying to get an election done. We think these were a mistake, but we think they are a fatal mistake, and these ballots ought not be counted.
浏览附件RfF0UMle8Pkx_Ace.mp4
