tribunal是一个官僚机构, 不是法院,人家即使偷了一次,保安怎么就认定ta会再偷,这是涉及歧视的行为。遇到叫真的可以去人权法庭告。人权法庭就是依据人权宪章来判。
没执行能力,
tribunal是一个官僚机构, 不是法院,人家即使偷了一次,保安怎么就认定ta会再偷,这是涉及歧视的行为。遇到叫真的可以去人权法庭告。人权法庭就是依据人权宪章来判。
你说的是不是这个案子https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_v_Carswell你看看Harrison vs. Carswell 最高法院裁决。
这个判决的关键词是:你说的是不是这个案子https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_v_Carswell
最高法院先是判商场是私人区域,后来有不同意见。省政府又重新立法,承认商场是公共区域。
In Post-Charter Canada the question remains unresolved. The Court's multiple reasons in Committee for the Commonwealth of Canada v. Canada [1991] 1 SCR 139 leave things particularly ambiguous. Shortly after the decision the Manitoba government amended The Petty Trespasses Act to allow picketing and other forms of communication of "true statements" on mall property. The legislation recognizes malls as public spaces where arbitrary withdrawal is no longer lawful on behalf of mall owners.
既然商场开放给顾客区域属于公共场所,那么商场以何种理由拒绝任何人进入他的店?这个判决的关键词是:
所以曼省修改法律,适当限制商场权力。美国加州也是这样。即使是这样,商店老板还是可以拒绝任何人进入他的店,这个法律修改了也只是针对商场的公共地方。
- individual proprietary rights of an owner of property is always protected under Canadian Law unless a statute provides otherwise
偷东西可以是理由既然商场开放给顾客区域属于公共场所,那么商场以何种理由拒绝任何人进入他的店?
即使是小偷,商店有权通知警察来抓,但没有权限制他在公共场所自由移动吧?
确实还没有小偷挑战过这个规定,所以可以暂时这样做。偷东西可以是理由
衣着违和 也可以是拒绝服务的理由
打架吵架 侵犯别的顾客和平享受 也行
吸毒贩毒 也是理由
关键是 用行为界定拒绝的根据
商场商店还真不是完全私有的地方。你首先不要把公权和私权搞混了。私有的地方,可以无理由拒绝任何人入内。
可能各个省的法律有些不同哈。 魁省是这样规定的我是说商店老板可以拒绝任何人进入他的店。曼省修改法律后商场公共区域成了公众场所,但各个商店租给了店主,不是公众场所,店主可以拒绝任何人进入。
看楼上的Public services, public transport and public places的定义先政府有股份?
这得去找最高法院裁决,在没裁决之前,先暂且这么认着把。如果法律认为我自己花钱买的地方是公共场所,这样的法律就是违宪的。大型 MALL ,投资之前会有很多政府管制,签字认账了再买,等于放弃部分私权求个投资机会。
但是 有一个假设 他的行为没有过分的地方可能各个省的法律有些不同哈。 魁省是这样规定的
Every person has a full and equal right to access public services, public transport and public places. This right is guaranteed under the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms .Your rights in public services, transportation and places | CDPDJ
Overview of the rights protected by the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms in services, transportation and public places such as parks, schools or businesses.www.cdpdj.qc.ca
Therefore, discrimination and harassment are prohibited with respect to public services, public transport and public places. For example, a merchant cannot deny access to his store to a person with a service dog.
Public services, public transport and public places include:
- Businesses, restaurants and hotels
- Parks, camp sites and caravan sites
- Schools and churches
你这个不是法律,是人权组织的bb,我不听它的,它不一定赢得了我的。可能各个省的法律有些不同哈。 魁省是这样规定的
Every person has a full and equal right to access public services, public transport and public places. This right is guaranteed under the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms .Your rights in public services, transportation and places | CDPDJ
Overview of the rights protected by the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms in services, transportation and public places such as parks, schools or businesses.www.cdpdj.qc.ca
Therefore, discrimination and harassment are prohibited with respect to public services, public transport and public places. For example, a merchant cannot deny access to his store to a person with a service dog.
Public services, public transport and public places include:
- Businesses, restaurants and hotels
- Parks, camp sites and caravan sites
- Schools and churches
明显咋咋呼呼的,喝酒吸毒后踉踉跄跄,这些可以预见可能对他人造成伤害的,应该都可以禁止但是 有一个假设 他的行为没有过分的地方
商店不能拒绝人 可以拒绝一些行为
电影院就可以以孩子哭为根据不让他进来