这几天有一篇叫“纽西兰大屠杀，主流媒体不想让你知道的真相”的文章在中文网上广为传播，激起了一片叫好声，我在加拿大地方中文网站上也到处看到转贴。作者所说的真相是什么呢？大概就是白人杀手杀穆斯林，其实是冤有头债有主，穆斯林与欧洲历史上就是冤家对头。而主流媒体不想让我们知道。
如果这算是一个真相，那这个大屠杀还有另外一个真相。这是一个中国人不想让你知道的真相，几乎是所有报道和研究这个大屠杀的中国人都有意无意隐藏起来的真相 --
这就是：这个白人杀手认为白人所面临着在自己的土地上被外来移民入侵者“种族灭绝”的威胁，而最大的入侵威胁是来自东方，特别是中国，土耳其，以及印度。
我最初是看见有华人网友提到只言片语，就在我的上篇文章里提到了。不想引起很多华人的激愤，说是我毫无根据别有用心的捏造，质疑我把这个白人反抗穆斯林恐怖主义的事件“引向种族”，似要“挑拨离间华人和白人”，云云。
我啼笑皆非，打算去找杀手宣言的中文翻译来证明。结果看了一篇篇介绍这个恐怖袭击宣言的中文报道和研究文章，比如前面提到的那片广为传播的文章，居然就渺无踪影。不管是大陆的，还是海外的，还是台湾的。。。没有一篇文章如此报道。哇我得赶快去找英文原文。结果原文又已经在英文互联网上给封锁了。
还好本人有一定的研究能力，最后终于找到了。猜猜是谁说出这个真相来的？印度人。在印度的最大主流媒体上大字标题醒目地说出来了。
我引用的这篇登在indianexpress上，大字标题就是：In New Zealand gunman’s manifesto: Invaders from India, and enemies in the East，（纽西兰杀手的宣言：印度来的入侵者，和东方的敌人）然后副标题：New Zealand terror attack: The manifesto stated that “the invaders must be removed from European soil, regardless from where they came or when they came. Roma, African, Indian, Turkish, Semitic or other. If they are not of our people, they must be removed.” （纽西兰恐袭：宣言称入侵者必须被从欧洲的土地上赶走，不管他们是从哪里来。罗马，非洲，印度，土耳其，闪米特和其他。如果不是我们的人民，他们必须被赶走）
然后文章介绍到Page 63 of the manifesto states, “If we wait until the majority of the boomers begin to pass (between 2028-2038 depending on individual nations and life expectancies)than it will be too little, too late. As by this time the invaders and occupiers of lands, non-Europeans, numbers will be swollen to a staggering size, due to both mass immigration and the differing birthrates between the native European people and these invaders.” （如果我们等到大多数婴儿潮的时代去世，就会太晚了。到那时那些外来入侵者，非欧洲人，他们的数目会太大，因为他们的大量移民和高出生率。
“Also, relying on this time period for our victory holds a second major disadvantage, that being vulnerability to foreign invasion, most likely from the east, specifically China; Turkey; India or some combination of the three. This time of possible instability will also be a at a time where our potential nation enemies in the East will be reaching their own zeniths of power. We must not be in a chaotic, life or death civil war at a time when our rival nations are at their peak of dominance. The risk is too great.” （我们还有一个第二大主要不利，就是我们很容易受到来自东方的入侵者们的入侵，特别是来自中国，土耳其和印度，或者是这三者的组合。这个时期我们在东方的潜在敌人会达到他们的权利峰顶，此时我们一定不能内乱。）
印度人这篇文章我全文贴在此文后面。
我很感慨，为什么说出这个简单实事的是印度人，而非中国人？这些中国人，就如那个“真相”文的作者一样，都是读过杀手宣言全文的。然而他们都做了“节选”，选取的大都是跟穆斯林有关的，而极少跟中国人自己有关的。很奇怪不是吗。按道理哪有不关心自己跟一件大事的关系问题，却只关心别人的关系问题的？
结论只能是，中国人他们都有意无意地隐藏起来了这个真相。甚至对杀手赤裸裸的种族主义目的都大事化小的忽略过去，而把大屠杀朔造成一个仅仅是白人 v穆斯林的流血冲突恐怖袭击 。
为什么？难道中国人就不想知道客观事实？认知客观事实，是人类智力的基础。 而中国人却只能认知自己想要的真实。对自己不利的真实则假装不存在？自欺欺人？想起了中国人最爱用的相机美颜过滤镜。。。这应该就是为什么，中国人会闹出-“白人杀手本想杀鸡吓猴，猴却欢呼到：杀的好！”这样的笑话。。。
我不由得感叹，还是印度人，实诚一点。至少不骗他们自己。还是印度人，有勇气一点，至少干直面对自己不利，血淋淋的真实。难怪当他们走向世界他们比中国人更受人尊重，更成功。。。
中国人，我们为什么就不可以？
In New Zealand gunman’s manifesto: Invaders from India, and enemies in the East
https://indianexpress.com/article/w...s-from-india-and-enemies-in-the-east-5629139/
New Zealand terror attack: The manifesto stated that “the invaders must be removed from European soil, regardless from where they came or when they came. Roma, African, Indian, Turkish, Semitic or other. If they are not of our people, they must be removed.”
In the 74-page manifesto he left behind after gunning down 49 people who were attending Friday prayers in two mosques in Christchurch in New Zealand, 28-year-old Brenton Tarrant talks about an “invasion” from India, along with China and Turkey, and defines the three countries as “potential nation enemies in the East”.
The manifesto, titled “The Great Replacement”, also stated that “the invaders must be removed from European soil, regardless from where they came or when they came. Roma, African, Indian, Turkish, Semitic or other. If they are not of our people, but live in our lands, they must be removed.”
The document was uploaded on a document cloud and social media and sheds light on Tarrant, an Australian who New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern called a “terrorist”, the state of his radicalised mind and how he planned the attack.
Page 63 of the manifesto states, “If we wait until the majority of the boomers begin to pass (between 2028-2038 depending on individual nations and life expectancies)than it will be too little, too late. As by this time the invaders and occupiers of lands, non-Europeans, numbers will be swollen to a staggering size, due to both mass immigration and the differing birthrates between the native European people and these invaders.”
“Also, relying on this time period for our victory holds a second major disadvantage, that being vulnerability to foreign invasion, most likely from the east, specifically China;Turkey;India or some combination of the three. This time of possible instability will also be a at a time where our potential nation enemies in the East will be reaching their own zeniths of power. We must not be in a chaotic, life or death civil war at a time when our rival nations are at their peak of dominance. The risk is too great.”
The manifesto details, in question and answer format, his plan and choice of mosques. He claims to have begun “planning an attack roughly two years in advance and an attack at the location in Christchurch three months in advance”.
The attacker said that “the best time to attack was yesterday, the next best time is today”, but does not mention reasons. “The attack was planned to allow enough time to train, form a plan, settle my affairs, write down my views, then enact the attack”.
About choosing New Zealand, he said that “New Zealand was not the original choice for attack, I only arrived to New Zealand to live temporarily whilst I planned and trained, but I soon found out that New Zealand was as target rich of an environment as anywhere else in the West.”
“Secondly, an attack in New Zealand would bring to attention the truth of the assault on our civilization, that nowhere in the world was safe, the invaders were in all of our lands, even in the remotest areas of the world and that there was nowhere left to go that was safe and free from mass immigration.”
On choosing the two mosques, he claims that “originally the mosque in Dunedin was the main target”, “the Christchurch and Linwood mosques had far more invaders, in a more prominent and optically foreign building, with less students,more adults and a prior history of extremism. Attacking these mosques also allowed for an extra planned attack on the mosque in Ashburton, whilst I am unsure as of this time of writing whether I will reach that target, it was a bonus objective.”
According to the manifesto, he “chose firearms for the affect it would have on social discourse, the extra media coverage they would provide and the affect it could have on the politics of United states and thereby the political situation of the world.”
He also said that he could have chosen any weapons or means, and counted as available an explosives-filled truck or plane attacks. “I had the will and I had the resources”, he said.
如果这算是一个真相，那这个大屠杀还有另外一个真相。这是一个中国人不想让你知道的真相，几乎是所有报道和研究这个大屠杀的中国人都有意无意隐藏起来的真相 --
这就是：这个白人杀手认为白人所面临着在自己的土地上被外来移民入侵者“种族灭绝”的威胁，而最大的入侵威胁是来自东方，特别是中国，土耳其，以及印度。
我最初是看见有华人网友提到只言片语，就在我的上篇文章里提到了。不想引起很多华人的激愤，说是我毫无根据别有用心的捏造，质疑我把这个白人反抗穆斯林恐怖主义的事件“引向种族”，似要“挑拨离间华人和白人”，云云。
我啼笑皆非，打算去找杀手宣言的中文翻译来证明。结果看了一篇篇介绍这个恐怖袭击宣言的中文报道和研究文章，比如前面提到的那片广为传播的文章，居然就渺无踪影。不管是大陆的，还是海外的，还是台湾的。。。没有一篇文章如此报道。哇我得赶快去找英文原文。结果原文又已经在英文互联网上给封锁了。
还好本人有一定的研究能力，最后终于找到了。猜猜是谁说出这个真相来的？印度人。在印度的最大主流媒体上大字标题醒目地说出来了。
我引用的这篇登在indianexpress上，大字标题就是：In New Zealand gunman’s manifesto: Invaders from India, and enemies in the East，（纽西兰杀手的宣言：印度来的入侵者，和东方的敌人）然后副标题：New Zealand terror attack: The manifesto stated that “the invaders must be removed from European soil, regardless from where they came or when they came. Roma, African, Indian, Turkish, Semitic or other. If they are not of our people, they must be removed.” （纽西兰恐袭：宣言称入侵者必须被从欧洲的土地上赶走，不管他们是从哪里来。罗马，非洲，印度，土耳其，闪米特和其他。如果不是我们的人民，他们必须被赶走）
然后文章介绍到Page 63 of the manifesto states, “If we wait until the majority of the boomers begin to pass (between 2028-2038 depending on individual nations and life expectancies)than it will be too little, too late. As by this time the invaders and occupiers of lands, non-Europeans, numbers will be swollen to a staggering size, due to both mass immigration and the differing birthrates between the native European people and these invaders.” （如果我们等到大多数婴儿潮的时代去世，就会太晚了。到那时那些外来入侵者，非欧洲人，他们的数目会太大，因为他们的大量移民和高出生率。
“Also, relying on this time period for our victory holds a second major disadvantage, that being vulnerability to foreign invasion, most likely from the east, specifically China; Turkey; India or some combination of the three. This time of possible instability will also be a at a time where our potential nation enemies in the East will be reaching their own zeniths of power. We must not be in a chaotic, life or death civil war at a time when our rival nations are at their peak of dominance. The risk is too great.” （我们还有一个第二大主要不利，就是我们很容易受到来自东方的入侵者们的入侵，特别是来自中国，土耳其和印度，或者是这三者的组合。这个时期我们在东方的潜在敌人会达到他们的权利峰顶，此时我们一定不能内乱。）
印度人这篇文章我全文贴在此文后面。
我很感慨，为什么说出这个简单实事的是印度人，而非中国人？这些中国人，就如那个“真相”文的作者一样，都是读过杀手宣言全文的。然而他们都做了“节选”，选取的大都是跟穆斯林有关的，而极少跟中国人自己有关的。很奇怪不是吗。按道理哪有不关心自己跟一件大事的关系问题，却只关心别人的关系问题的？
结论只能是，中国人他们都有意无意地隐藏起来了这个真相。甚至对杀手赤裸裸的种族主义目的都大事化小的忽略过去，而把大屠杀朔造成一个仅仅是白人 v穆斯林的流血冲突恐怖袭击 。
为什么？难道中国人就不想知道客观事实？认知客观事实，是人类智力的基础。 而中国人却只能认知自己想要的真实。对自己不利的真实则假装不存在？自欺欺人？想起了中国人最爱用的相机美颜过滤镜。。。这应该就是为什么，中国人会闹出-“白人杀手本想杀鸡吓猴，猴却欢呼到：杀的好！”这样的笑话。。。
我不由得感叹，还是印度人，实诚一点。至少不骗他们自己。还是印度人，有勇气一点，至少干直面对自己不利，血淋淋的真实。难怪当他们走向世界他们比中国人更受人尊重，更成功。。。
中国人，我们为什么就不可以？
In New Zealand gunman’s manifesto: Invaders from India, and enemies in the East
https://indianexpress.com/article/w...s-from-india-and-enemies-in-the-east-5629139/
New Zealand terror attack: The manifesto stated that “the invaders must be removed from European soil, regardless from where they came or when they came. Roma, African, Indian, Turkish, Semitic or other. If they are not of our people, they must be removed.”
In the 74-page manifesto he left behind after gunning down 49 people who were attending Friday prayers in two mosques in Christchurch in New Zealand, 28-year-old Brenton Tarrant talks about an “invasion” from India, along with China and Turkey, and defines the three countries as “potential nation enemies in the East”.
The manifesto, titled “The Great Replacement”, also stated that “the invaders must be removed from European soil, regardless from where they came or when they came. Roma, African, Indian, Turkish, Semitic or other. If they are not of our people, but live in our lands, they must be removed.”
The document was uploaded on a document cloud and social media and sheds light on Tarrant, an Australian who New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern called a “terrorist”, the state of his radicalised mind and how he planned the attack.
Page 63 of the manifesto states, “If we wait until the majority of the boomers begin to pass (between 2028-2038 depending on individual nations and life expectancies)than it will be too little, too late. As by this time the invaders and occupiers of lands, non-Europeans, numbers will be swollen to a staggering size, due to both mass immigration and the differing birthrates between the native European people and these invaders.”
“Also, relying on this time period for our victory holds a second major disadvantage, that being vulnerability to foreign invasion, most likely from the east, specifically China;Turkey;India or some combination of the three. This time of possible instability will also be a at a time where our potential nation enemies in the East will be reaching their own zeniths of power. We must not be in a chaotic, life or death civil war at a time when our rival nations are at their peak of dominance. The risk is too great.”
The manifesto details, in question and answer format, his plan and choice of mosques. He claims to have begun “planning an attack roughly two years in advance and an attack at the location in Christchurch three months in advance”.
The attacker said that “the best time to attack was yesterday, the next best time is today”, but does not mention reasons. “The attack was planned to allow enough time to train, form a plan, settle my affairs, write down my views, then enact the attack”.
About choosing New Zealand, he said that “New Zealand was not the original choice for attack, I only arrived to New Zealand to live temporarily whilst I planned and trained, but I soon found out that New Zealand was as target rich of an environment as anywhere else in the West.”
“Secondly, an attack in New Zealand would bring to attention the truth of the assault on our civilization, that nowhere in the world was safe, the invaders were in all of our lands, even in the remotest areas of the world and that there was nowhere left to go that was safe and free from mass immigration.”
On choosing the two mosques, he claims that “originally the mosque in Dunedin was the main target”, “the Christchurch and Linwood mosques had far more invaders, in a more prominent and optically foreign building, with less students,more adults and a prior history of extremism. Attacking these mosques also allowed for an extra planned attack on the mosque in Ashburton, whilst I am unsure as of this time of writing whether I will reach that target, it was a bonus objective.”
According to the manifesto, he “chose firearms for the affect it would have on social discourse, the extra media coverage they would provide and the affect it could have on the politics of United states and thereby the political situation of the world.”
He also said that he could have chosen any weapons or means, and counted as available an explosives-filled truck or plane attacks. “I had the will and I had the resources”, he said.
