日本发现Moderna疫苗里有不锈钢残渣,3批新冠疫苗被召回

你怎么知道的呢?是自己编的还是看别人编的截图?证据没有胡乱说?英文Source在哪?Comirnaty 就是pfizer换了个名字而已
多说一点,在FDA的Pfizer认证中说到Comirnaty没有关于long-term health outcomes的Info. 风险自负(a warning about these risks ).

同时,EUA授权仍然适用于Comirnaty。

Screenshot_20210906-221545_Chrome.jpg
 
多说一点,在FDA的Pfizer认证中说到Comirnaty没有关于long-term health outcomes的Info. 风险自负(a warning about these risks ).

同时,EUA授权仍然适用于Comirnaty。

浏览附件661260
这和最终解释权归别人一样的,疫苗才出来一年你让人家怎么看长期后果?standard legal talk,蝇头小文写在clause里,完全不代表会有问题,给你说的危言耸听。antivaxxer黔驴技穷了只好拿这个说说事,之前气壮山河的散播谣言看不见了
 
这和最终解释权归别人一样的,standard legal talk,蝇头小文写在clause里,给你说的危言耸听。antivaxxer黔驴技穷了只好拿这个说说事,之前气壮山河的散播谣言看不见了
我只说些已发生的事实而已,那来的危言耸听啊。

面对这些无可否认的现实,黔驴技穷是你吧。

再多说一点,我没反对打疫苗,我反对是强制打,不是一回事儿,懂不懂🥸
 
我只说些已发生的事实而已,那来的危言耸听啊。

面对这些无可否认的现实,黔驴技穷是你吧。

再多说一点,我没反对打疫苗,我反对是强制打,不是一回事儿,懂不懂🥸
哪来的事实我辟谣一遍不够还得再来一遍?还无可否认笑死我了做梦醒不过来了。 不跟你说了,旁观者自清
 
那政府推的Vaccine Passport算什么🤔

土豆政府离全民强制只有一步之遥了

学点儿逻辑吧
我多大法学院毕业的你跟我说学点逻辑。。。你说了这么多我就没看到一丁点逻辑。

“It’s just limiting the ability to participate in certain activities if they don’t have a vaccine. If, in fact, the government were forcing people to be vaccinated – like actually physically holding people down and giving them a vaccine – that would probably be a pretty clear charter breach.”

Mandates offer a choice: receive or decline the vaccine. Those who decline are instead presented with a different set of options.

“In the case of students, you can try to enroll in online classes, or you can take a term off. In the case of employees, you can try to seek accommodation or take a leave, These may be inconvenient and unwanted options, but they are options. Even if a claimant were to make out that there has been a violation of the liberty interest or security of person interest, they would also have to prove that the infringement was under circumstances that violated principles of fundamental justice. In other words, the mandate is arbitrary, overly broad or grossly disproportionate. <<<<<<这是宪法第七条

宪法没学过吧?没学过就别扯。统计这种对中国人比较容易的你都不懂,还讲什么逻辑,自己该干嘛干嘛没人强迫你打药,完全混淆视听,丢人
 
最后编辑: 2021-09-07
我多大法学院毕业的你跟我说学点逻辑。。。你说了这么多我就没看到一丁点逻辑。

“It’s just limiting the ability to participate in certain activities if they don’t have a vaccine. If, in fact, the government were forcing people to be vaccinated – like actually physically holding people down and giving them a vaccine – that would probably be a pretty clear charter breach.”

Mandates offer a choice: receive or decline the vaccine. Those who decline are instead presented with a different set of options.

“In the case of students, you can try to enroll in online classes, or you can take a term off. In the case of employees, you can try to seek accommodation or take a leave, These may be inconvenient and unwanted options, but they are options. Even if a claimant were to make out that there has been a violation of the liberty interest or security of person interest, they would also have to prove that the infringement was under circumstances that violated principles of fundamental justice. In other words, the mandate is arbitrary, overly broad or grossly disproportionate. <<<<<<这是宪法第七条

宪法没学过吧?没学过就别扯。统计这种对中国人比较容易的你都不懂,还讲什么逻辑,自己该干嘛干嘛没人强迫你打药,完全混淆视听,丢人
你真让围观群众大开眼界😂

你回看看你在这楼说的能不能逻辑自恰
 
我多大法学院毕业的你跟我说学点逻辑。。。你说了这么多我就没看到一丁点逻辑。

“It’s just limiting the ability to participate in certain activities if they don’t have a vaccine. If, in fact, the government were forcing people to be vaccinated – like actually physically holding people down and giving them a vaccine – that would probably be a pretty clear charter breach.”

Mandates offer a choice: receive or decline the vaccine. Those who decline are instead presented with a different set of options.

“In the case of students, you can try to enroll in online classes, or you can take a term off. In the case of employees, you can try to seek accommodation or take a leave, These may be inconvenient and unwanted options, but they are options. Even if a claimant were to make out that there has been a violation of the liberty interest or security of person interest, they would also have to prove that the infringement was under circumstances that violated principles of fundamental justice. In other words, the mandate is arbitrary, overly broad or grossly disproportionate. <<<<<<这是宪法第七条

宪法没学过吧?没学过就别扯。统计这种对中国人比较容易的你都不懂,还讲什么逻辑,自己该干嘛干嘛没人强迫你打药,完全混淆视听,丢人

来多大法学院毕业的给围观群众上上课,土豆的强制联邦雇员接种疫苗怎么就不是 Force Vaccination

SmartSelect_20210907-021909_Chrome.jpg
 
我多大法学院毕业的你跟我说学点逻辑。。。你说了这么多我就没看到一丁点逻辑。

“It’s just limiting the ability to participate in certain activities if they don’t have a vaccine. If, in fact, the government were forcing people to be vaccinated – like actually physically holding people down and giving them a vaccine – that would probably be a pretty clear charter breach.”

Mandates offer a choice: receive or decline the vaccine. Those who decline are instead presented with a different set of options.

“In the case of students, you can try to enroll in online classes, or you can take a term off. In the case of employees, you can try to seek accommodation or take a leave, These may be inconvenient and unwanted options, but they are options. Even if a claimant were to make out that there has been a violation of the liberty interest or security of person interest, they would also have to prove that the infringement was under circumstances that violated principles of fundamental justice. In other words, the mandate is arbitrary, overly broad or grossly disproportionate. <<<<<<这是宪法第七条

宪法没学过吧?没学过就别扯。统计这种对中国人比较容易的你都不懂,还讲什么逻辑,自己该干嘛干嘛没人强迫你打药,完全混淆视听,丢人
还有个问题,你怎么证明持有Vaccine Passport的病毒感染者不传播病毒,没危害公共安全🤔
 

注册或登录来发表评论

您必须是注册会员才可以发表评论

注册帐号

注册帐号. 太容易了!

登录

已有帐号? 在这里登录.

Similar threads

顶部