其实去年4月18号收到Tabingo的判决，从头到尾看了一次之后，我就发现了只有一个突破口：
[144] The applicants submit that if the underlying application had been terminated, then the
Minister could not invoke section 25.2. Those individuals had already been issued permanent
resident visas; some may have already landed in Canada. I see no conflict between the Minister’s
decision under section 25.2 and his position in the present applications.
The nature of the discretion
conferred under section 25.2 is very broad, and, in any event, no request has been made to the
Minister nor is there a refusal. The argument is thus premature.
JusticeRennie的意思是，要想得到部长特权大赦，你应该先向CIC提出此要求。
这段话就有松动的意味，法院的意思可能是：你们先向CIC要求用25.2赦免，如果CIC不同意，再来找法院。你既没有向CIC要求，CIC也没有拒你这项要求，你这个辩论就太premature了。
只有这一点比较靠谱，其他的什么违宪啊，侵犯人权啊，全部是扯蛋。
这个Justice Rennie其实对技移比较同情，他去年一月开庭现场是激烈批评CIC的，记者都录音了，他的判决书最后一段表达了“多愁善感”，sentimental的意味：
[147] As noted earlier,
the applicants have waited in the queue for many years only to find the
entrance door closed. They see the termination of their hope for a new life in Canada to be an
unfair, arbitrary and unnecessary measure. However, section 87.4 is valid legislation, compliant
with the rule of law, the Bill of Rights and the Charter. The applications have been terminated by
operation of law and this Court cannot order mandamus.
这样的句子在法院文件很罕见，因为法律文件都是冷冰冰的，没有人情，这里却充满了强烈的sentimentality。
这次投移的女法官Gleason，与Rennie比起来，铁石心肠了不知多少倍，通篇没有一句同情的话，没有一点松动的空隙，那口气简直是把投移当成仇人。想不到吧，女人更强势更狠。
英文的南华早报就注意到了法官的强硬口气，这样报道：
http://www.scmp.com/news/world/arti...aire-migrants-compensation-claim-over-defunct
In a
strongly worded ruling, Justice Mary Gleason said “would-be immigrants have no right to force the Minister [of immigration] to set any particular quota for any economic [immigration] class. This determination is in keeping with long-established principles, which hold that no one possesses a right to immigrate”.
那下面的网友评论，把她捧成了英雄，说她不畏惧中国。
看了不少中英文网友对投移的评论，他们的矛头一致对准投移的财富，仇富和仇视大陆的心理很明显。
这倒是让我感觉奇了，那些被切的投移绝大部分都是40万投资的申请人，40万加币，240万人民币，这么点钱，也能称得上富翁？
加分
