你被追尾，可能是对方的保险公司出的钱。消防车出动肯定要出钱的，就看是谁出而已。
- 主题发起人 ying-yingx
- 发布时间 2016-07-10
- 最大赞力
- 0.00
- 当前赞力
- 100.00%
被追尾的不止我一人， 还有3个车的1人。 被告也没有律师， 就是不出庭，我们受害人收到法庭出庭信， 必须到庭听证。
- 最大赞力
- 0.00
- 当前赞力
- 100.00%
谢谢你的解答！
我因为不太关心这些事， 所以不太有去研究。对你的回答我找到了答案和补充（ 安省交通厅的）：
Why was I billed for an emergency response I didn’t ask for?
I was on QEW Niagara (Town of Lincoln) when my hood flew open, impacting the windshield. I calmly pulled over and called CAA. There was no collision.
To my surprise, an ambulance, two fire trucks and police then arrived. I didn’t call 911, so apparently a passing motorist did. MTO invoiced me $922.50 for fire department response that I neither requested nor required.
From my observation, the fire department did little on scene. I’ve yet to make any insurance claim and feel this invoice is unfair.
Ontario Transportation Ministry spokesperson Bob Nichols replies:
Since the 1970s, an arrangement has been in place with the Ontario Association of Fire Chiefs whereby MTO pays municipal fire departments for responding to incidents on provincial highways.
The ministry then recovers costs from the responsible motorist.
Fire departments are compensated for responding, regardless of whether emergency services were provided. Fire departments may opt out of the agreement and instead invoice vehicle owners/insurance companies directly.
Decisions about liability are based on police and fire department reports. The Ministry’s authority to invoice for such claims is under the Highway Traffic Act.
The vehicle owner has the option of discussing the liability with his/her insurance company. If the owner disputes the bill, they can provide their facts to the ministry to consider, in addition to police and fire deptartment reports.
The policy is applied fairly to all incidents in Ontario. Upon receipt of a 911 call, fire departments are obligated to respond. There is a standard $410 per hour per vehicle call-out charge for fire service calls to incidents on provincial highways.
Steve Kee of the Insurance Bureau of Canada forwarded this response from their Consumer Information Centre staff:
“I can tell you from experience that these bylaws are enforceable. I tried the argument that fire departments operating expenses are paid for by my taxes but to no avail. If there is an auto insurance claim covered by an insured peril, then paragraph 7.4.1 says that the fire department charges are included in the settlement. Similarly, if there is a claim on a property policy, then fire department charges are covered up to a specified limit. In your reader’s case, if the driver were to submit a claim, the fire department charges would be covered by his auto insurance policy.”
As for local streets, Steve Johnston, spokesperson for the City of Toronto adds:
Our transportation department takes all steps available to recoup the costs associated with responding to collisions on the city of Toronto road network.
Eric Lai adds:
For the record, Toronto and Ottawa have opted in for MTO billing for services performed on provincial highways.
Greg Hudson, Lincoln Township fire chief, advises that two fire trucks were sent as per workplace safety regulations. Minimum charge is one hour per vehicle.
Apparently, insurers are routinely invoiced by municipalities and MTO for fire services response. In this instance, since no insurance claim was made, the driver was invoiced directly.
以上重点是： 安省公路高速路上出事， 肇事人的保险公司出钱付费， 或没有报保险的出事人直接付费， 无论当时他有没有报警还是别人报的警。
红字部分：
出事人有权去争论付费，即跟自己的保险公司一起向交通厅和警察，消防部门提出考虑事实依据以减少付费。
每辆消防车费用是1小时410刀。
多伦多市内街道的事故， 全由市府出钱付消防车和警车费用。
即出事人不付费，居民大楼或其他的火警不在此例需另付费（比如 500--2000刀）。
这就是我说的当年在街道上被追尾， 就算肇事者也不用付费。
最后编辑: 2016-07-11
阿尔伯塔省的火警费用在政府税收中支付，不单独收费
Similar threads
2024-03-25有新赞
全楼:0.00
xchn818
中国话题
2024回国记录
- 0.07 超赞 赏
- Jacklyns ,#485
- 2024-01-18
- 聊天・灌水・娱乐・新闻・时事
2024-01-28有新回复
全楼:0.96
wisdom
