新闻:《指妻子和3女儿伤风败俗 加拿大穆斯林杀4人重审(视频)》的相关评论
穆斯林传统挺可怕滴说
- 主题发起人 yamiyami
- 发布时间 2015-10-15
跟踪过这个案子的报道，一直觉得证据不确凿。
警察检查了掉入河里的NISSAN和沙菲亚家里的LEXUS，就得出结论：LEXUS 把 NISSAN 撞入河里，淹死了母女4人。
On June 30, 2009, a black Nissan Sentra with a broken left taillight was spotted submerged at the Kingston Mills locks, with four female bodies found inside. Mohammad Shafia was at the Kingston Police station to report that four of their family – three teenage daughters and a purported aunt – were missing.[7] Police initially believed that it was a tragic, if bizarre, accident, and first categorized it as a "sudden death investigation".
However, authorities soon learned that Hamed had reported an accident with the family Lexus SUV in an empty parking lot early that same morning in Montreal. Despite their suspicions, the authorities did not have "reasonable and probable grounds" or sufficient evidence to ask a judge for a search warrant. Kingston Police Det. Steve Koopman, the liaison with the Shafia family, managed to gain the Shafias' consent so that they could view the Lexus. After assessing the damage on both vehicles, police theorized that the Lexus was used to ram the Nissan into the locks.[14]
It has been reported that the Shafia family purchased the used Nissan Sentra for CAD$ 5,000 one day before the family left Montreal for Niagara Falls.
第一，既然是杀人用过的车，为什么还要报告事故？
第二，既然是杀人用过的车，为什么在警察没有搜查令的情况下，主动同意警察检车，而不是赶快销毁证据？
警察并没有在事故现场找到 LEXUS 脱落的油漆或者其它碎片。
这个案子最后是请陪审团判的。我认为是典型的舆论干预司法的案例。
大家都痛恨荣誉谋杀，我也痛恨。但我们还是要尊重事实，尊重坏人的权利。
警察检查了掉入河里的NISSAN和沙菲亚家里的LEXUS，就得出结论：LEXUS 把 NISSAN 撞入河里，淹死了母女4人。
On June 30, 2009, a black Nissan Sentra with a broken left taillight was spotted submerged at the Kingston Mills locks, with four female bodies found inside. Mohammad Shafia was at the Kingston Police station to report that four of their family – three teenage daughters and a purported aunt – were missing.[7] Police initially believed that it was a tragic, if bizarre, accident, and first categorized it as a "sudden death investigation".
However, authorities soon learned that Hamed had reported an accident with the family Lexus SUV in an empty parking lot early that same morning in Montreal. Despite their suspicions, the authorities did not have "reasonable and probable grounds" or sufficient evidence to ask a judge for a search warrant. Kingston Police Det. Steve Koopman, the liaison with the Shafia family, managed to gain the Shafias' consent so that they could view the Lexus. After assessing the damage on both vehicles, police theorized that the Lexus was used to ram the Nissan into the locks.[14]
It has been reported that the Shafia family purchased the used Nissan Sentra for CAD$ 5,000 one day before the family left Montreal for Niagara Falls.
第一，既然是杀人用过的车，为什么还要报告事故？
第二，既然是杀人用过的车，为什么在警察没有搜查令的情况下，主动同意警察检车，而不是赶快销毁证据？
警察并没有在事故现场找到 LEXUS 脱落的油漆或者其它碎片。
这个案子最后是请陪审团判的。我认为是典型的舆论干预司法的案例。
大家都痛恨荣誉谋杀，我也痛恨。但我们还是要尊重事实，尊重坏人的权利。
因为他认同你的结论，以为没证据，警察不能拿他怎样。所以
1。杀过人的车，还可以获得赔偿，爽。
2。来验车吧，验出来又能拿我怎样，哇哈哈。
对审判过程不清楚，但我想光凭推论，没证据支持的话就判刑，加国的司法系统也不至于这样吧。
Canada is a country of common law, the jury can make its verdict through the conviction or conscience they believe.
Unlike common low, civil law shall request it be judged by convincing and substantial evidences.
If only you can convince the members of the 12 jury members that the procecuted person is guilty, they the judge will rule out.
By theorization, which does not mean it come up with a conclusion by hypothesis, speculation or assumption, the procecuter put together all the evidences (marks on both vehicles, statement of the suspected, motive, alibi proof) working toward one direction, and supported by other evidences, the jury was convinced.
最后编辑: 2015-10-16
Similar threads
