就这样,你还没辙。V5BC。
重症增长率和死亡率是符合实际的,哪位大神统计一下,如果曲线和整体一样就说明问题了。如果这样能好,对社会和经济的伤害最小,没什么不好。
中国的核酸检测召回率比较低,40%左右(可能最近有提升了),所以多次测试也不算多严格。当然BC的这个标准是有些松了。昨天好像有一篇文章说张文宏的团队研究发现无症状感染者也是会传染其他人的,感染的概率跟有症状的感染者没有统计意义上的差别。
无意中在网上看到一网友评论BC省的世界级抗新冠疫情:只给有限人群反复检测,家庭医生,网上医生,急诊科医生确定是新冠也不给检测,说试剂盒不够。UBC专家说可以提供2 millions检测剂,Dr. Henry 又说等曲线压平了再给检测。国际康复标准是在一定时间内连续三次检测为阴性才可以确定康复. 这边居然没症状就算康复。看看这些数字,死亡率2%,治愈率31%.看看世界上那个国家有如此高的治愈率?有特效药吗?没有,全靠自免疫力。
上面评论说的信息还不能确定是否都属实(比如说UBC专家说可以提供2 millions检测剂等),但是引起我的兴趣来对比中加(严格来说是BC省)新冠肺炎病人康复标准,哪个更可靠谱?通过网上搜刮来的资料,简单对比如下:
1.中国新冠肺炎病人康复标准:
据国家卫生健康委体改司司长梁万年介绍,中国新冠肺炎病人的标准是新冠肺炎患者在临床症状消失、体征恢复后,间隔24小时进行两次核酸检测,若结果为双阴才可出院。为防止出院后出现复阳,出院病人需接受14天医学观察。在做完进一步测试后(第三次核酸检测),才能说病人是否康复。
2.BC省新冠肺炎病人康复标准:
轻症新冠患者应在自我隔离10-15天后,患者呼吸道症状消失(不计算咳嗽),体温正常就算康复了,可以进行正常日常活动了。简单粗暴吧!附BCCDC原文如下:
With or without a history of travel, if you have respiratory symptoms that can be managed at home, self-isolate at home for at least 10 days after onset of symptoms. After 10 days, if your temperature is normal and you feel better, you can return to your routine activities. Coughing may persist for several weeks, so a cough alone does not mean you need to continue to self-isolate for more than 10 days.
Here are two examples of differing self-isolation periods for returning travellers that develop respiratory symptoms upon their return:
Example 1: Respiratory symptoms appear five days after returning to Canada. Self-isolate for 10 additional days for a total of 15 days.
Example 2: Respiratory symptoms appear two days after returning to Canada. Self-isolate for 10 additional days for a total of 12 days.
最后说一下BC省新冠病毒检测标准,因为这个和新冠肺炎病人康复标准有关联。目前BC的检测标准是优先测重症病人,和出现症状的医护人员,养老院的老人,重慢性病人。其他轻症的基本不测居家自我隔离。BC省卫生官员邦妮·亨利(Bonnie Henry)博士表示,对民众进行广泛测试,只有当疫情曲线出现下降后才会进行(为什么??)
因为居家自我隔离的轻症患者不测,所以14天隔离期过后如果没有变危重自然也是不测的,这一类轻症患者“被康复“后还会不会继续传播新冠病毒应该也是不确定的,到底对社区工作环境造成多大危险也是个未知数,是不是BC的童鞋们只能靠自我保护自求多福了?
真实官僚主义根据CTV报道,本那比医院一位在专门确认和疑似的COVID-19病例的部门的员工和温哥华CTV新闻中心联系,称担心医院处理该病毒的方式。
这位不愿透露姓名的工作人员写信表示:“我们担心由于这些不安全且极其危险的管理做法,导致医院患者和工作人员接触到新冠病毒,未能保护他们免受病毒的侵害。”
这封信概述了几个问题,包括在同一轮班中可能需要护士同时治疗确诊病例和仅为疑似病例的患者。
这封信还透露,在某些情况下,可疑COVID-19患者和患有非冠状病毒健康问题的老年患者一起被放在同一个病房中,并且处理这两组患者的护士还共享计算机和设备。
对此,菲沙健康局总裁兼首席执行官Victoria Lee博士则回应表示:“我们遵循基于证据的预防一线工作人员感染的国际最佳实践和指导。”
她表示,她了解在一线工作的人的压力和焦虑,非常感谢这些一线工作人员的勇气和专业精神,并深受鼓舞。
她指菲沙健康地区的十几家医院,大约有40名COVID-19患者。
下周公校开始部分复课了
应该是还没有决定吧?可能是网上学习。不是,学区都发信了。
觉得这个Henry, Dix以及温哥华市长这个团队在拿BC民众做一件非常冒险的事情。实在搞不明白他们采取非合理的方式去将曲线压平有何意义,寻找政绩?一时心理平衡?降低恐慌?因为实际曲线压根没平缓,他们仅仅是不让输入更多数据啊!他们重点测医护和养老院,但怎么不想一下这些人是怎么感染的?感染和传播源仅仅在这些地方吗?社区传播已经是事实了!
觉得这个Henry, Dix以及温哥华市长这个团队在拿BC民众做一件非常冒险的事情。实在搞不明白他们采取非合理的方式去将曲线压平有何意义,寻找政绩?一时心理平衡?降低恐慌?因为实际曲线压根没平缓,他们仅仅是不让输入更多数据啊!他们重点测医护和养老院,但怎么不想一下这些人是怎么感染的?感染和传播源仅仅在这些地方吗?社区传播已经是事实了!
就是这样还有11个养老院被感染了,这个新冠对老人们来说就相当于老人杀手啊!现在每天测3500已经饱和了,在逐步增加中。并不是说现在可以测5000只测3500。
曲线压平延缓趋势,是为了防止医疗挤兑,即武汉最初的情形。
引用网友stelated提供的检测数据:每个人都有检测机会,医院容量无限大,这是最理想状态,但是现实不是这样,所以肯定要有所取舍。
引用网友stelated提供的检测数据:
Mar 25: 34561
Mar 28: 38697
比较最新的公告,最近三天才测了4136例。和他们说的每天能测3500差了不少。
British Columbia
884 confirmed cases as of March 28, 2020
396 recovered in BC
17 deaths in BC
Cases by region:
291 in Fraser Health
77 in Interior Health
60 in Island Health
12 in Northern Health
444 in Vancouver Coastal Health
38,697 tests completed as of March 2
魁省曾经落后,现在检测数已经是联邦第一了我记得Admin有各省检测统计数据,AB省最好,魁北克最差,找不到了。
只能说明他们实施的是懒政而已,检测人数:现在每天测3500已经饱和了,在逐步增加中。并不是说现在可以测5000只测3500。
曲线压平延缓趋势,是为了防止医疗挤兑,即武汉最初的情形。
鸵鸟,缩头缩尾。小土豆媳妇说检查就检查,百姓靠自己努力?,增加免疫力。吃的健康、睡眠睡到自然醒,有氧健身无意中在网上看到一网友评论BC省的世界级抗新冠疫情:只给有限人群反复检测,家庭医生,网上医生,急诊科医生确定是新冠也不给检测,说试剂盒不够。UBC专家说可以提供2 millions检测剂,Dr. Henry 又说等曲线压平了再给检测。国际康复标准是在一定时间内连续三次检测为阴性才可以确定康复. 这边居然没症状就算康复。看看这些数字,死亡率2%,治愈率31%.看看世界上那个国家有如此高的治愈率?有特效药吗?没有,全靠自免疫力。
上面评论说的信息还不能确定是否都属实(比如说UBC专家说可以提供2 millions检测剂等),但是引起我的兴趣来对比中加(严格来说是BC省)新冠肺炎病人康复标准,哪个更可靠谱?通过网上搜刮来的资料,简单对比如下:
1.中国新冠肺炎病人康复标准:
据国家卫生健康委体改司司长梁万年介绍,中国新冠肺炎病人的标准是新冠肺炎患者在临床症状消失、体征恢复后,间隔24小时进行两次核酸检测,若结果为双阴才可出院。为防止出院后出现复阳,出院病人需接受14天医学观察。在做完进一步测试后(第三次核酸检测),才能说病人是否康复。
2.BC省新冠肺炎病人康复标准:
轻症新冠患者应在自我隔离10-15天后,患者呼吸道症状消失(不计算咳嗽),体温正常就算康复了,可以进行正常日常活动了。简单粗暴吧!附BCCDC原文如下:
With or without a history of travel, if you have respiratory symptoms that can be managed at home, self-isolate at home for at least 10 days after onset of symptoms. After 10 days, if your temperature is normal and you feel better, you can return to your routine activities. Coughing may persist for several weeks, so a cough alone does not mean you need to continue to self-isolate for more than 10 days.
Here are two examples of differing self-isolation periods for returning travellers that develop respiratory symptoms upon their return:
Example 1: Respiratory symptoms appear five days after returning to Canada. Self-isolate for 10 additional days for a total of 15 days.
Example 2: Respiratory symptoms appear two days after returning to Canada. Self-isolate for 10 additional days for a total of 12 days.
最后说一下BC省新冠病毒检测标准,因为这个和新冠肺炎病人康复标准有关联。目前BC的检测标准是优先测重症病人,和出现症状的医护人员,养老院的老人,重慢性病人。其他轻症的基本不测居家自我隔离。BC省卫生官员邦妮·亨利(Bonnie Henry)博士表示,对民众进行广泛测试,只有当疫情曲线出现下降后才会进行(为什么??)
因为居家自我隔离的轻症患者不测,所以14天隔离期过后如果没有变危重自然也是不测的,这一类轻症患者“被康复“后还会不会继续传播新冠病毒应该也是不确定的,到底对社区工作环境造成多大危险也是个未知数,是不是BC的童鞋们只能靠自我保护自求多福了?
所以说,美国最终是灭火人?????美国加油, 来自纽约医院第一线医生的抗击新冠报告!
美国加油!只有健康的美国才能促进世界经济的发展,才能让全世界人民有工作做,有更多的人类发明创造可以享受!
美国,一个发明了电,汽车,飞机,手机,电视广播,各种疫苗等等,汇聚全世界精英的国家,是不会被新冠击败的,每一次对美国的考验,只会让美国更强大!让世界更富足!
下面是在康奈尔医学院的华人朋友的2020年3月28日发自纽美国纽约第一线的简报:
美国现在一切都好,请世界人民放心!
一晃快周末了。今天医院系统住院病人比昨天增加100个,一共1229个病人。重症率稳定保持在20%-22%,所有重症病人都靠呼吸机支持。
今天最好的消息是Abbott的快速诊断系统被FDA快速批准。机器只有6磅重。可以用于各种场合。一滴血,阳性结果5分钟出结果,阴性结果13分钟出来。感觉病人去上个厕所就出结果了?
一天生产5万台机器。配合公司原来的检测系统,接下来的容量可以一天测试500万人。这是两天就能把纽约的八百万人口测一遍了。
现在医院缺测试用的棉签,所以暂停了所有其他需要同样棉签的呼吸道病原体化验。今天缅因州做保健品的Puritan今天宣布开始生产取样棉签支援。
第二个疫苗开始一期临床试验,Emory大学研发的。? 很荣幸和Dr. Fauci(顾颖琼博士友情提醒他是特朗普的医学总顾问)毕业于同一个内科住院医生项目。他做住院总时的照片。挂在医院长廊里。
目前联邦向各地发放了8000个战略储备的呼吸机。政府要求近10个公司大力生产呼吸机,接下来三个月目标生产10万个。
最坏预测纽约需要3万台呼吸机。通用GM强头倔脑不肯配合生产呼吸机,今天政府对他们施加防御生产体系条律,静观其后了。
发布会特朗普说他打电话问英国首相你怎样了,首相回答我们这儿需要呼吸机。医院很自豪创建两人合用呼吸机。当然这个不是适合于每个病人和每台机器。现在要在全世界推广方案。这个真是需要对呼吸生理病理有透彻的理解才能弄得出来。
我们医院外科口罩的问题解决了,貌似管够了。N95还是缺。苹果,美国邮政,默沙东等都捐了口罩。哥大工程学院3D打印的面罩已经正式启用,一天可以打印3000只。波音援助三架飞机专门各地运输医疗物资。
前几天州长号召医务人员支援。24小时内纽约州一万名退休医务人员应征。现在全国有5万名医务人员报名支援纽约。Jetblue提供免费飞机运送支援者。Hertz提供免费租车。四季酒店开放所有旅馆让医务人员入住。
这是从中国封城以来,有关这场瘟疫最有价值的消息(美国的快速度病毒检测仪)!!!!!!所以说,美国最终是灭火人?????
这是准备全民感染的节奏无意中在网上看到一网友评论BC省的世界级抗新冠疫情:只给有限人群反复检测,家庭医生,网上医生,急诊科医生确定是新冠也不给检测,说试剂盒不够。UBC专家说可以提供2 millions检测剂,Dr. Henry 又说等曲线压平了再给检测。国际康复标准是在一定时间内连续三次检测为阴性才可以确定康复. 这边居然没症状就算康复。看看这些数字,死亡率2%,治愈率31%.看看世界上那个国家有如此高的治愈率?有特效药吗?没有,全靠自免疫力。
上面评论说的信息还不能确定是否都属实(比如说UBC专家说可以提供2 millions检测剂等),但是引起我的兴趣来对比中加(严格来说是BC省)新冠肺炎病人康复标准,哪个更可靠谱?通过网上搜刮来的资料,简单对比如下:
1.中国新冠肺炎病人康复标准:
据国家卫生健康委体改司司长梁万年介绍,中国新冠肺炎病人的标准是新冠肺炎患者在临床症状消失、体征恢复后,间隔24小时进行两次核酸检测,若结果为双阴才可出院。为防止出院后出现复阳,出院病人需接受14天医学观察。在做完进一步测试后(第三次核酸检测),才能说病人是否康复。
2.BC省新冠肺炎病人康复标准:
轻症新冠患者应在自我隔离10-15天后,患者呼吸道症状消失(不计算咳嗽),体温正常就算康复了,可以进行正常日常活动了。简单粗暴吧!附BCCDC原文如下:
With or without a history of travel, if you have respiratory symptoms that can be managed at home, self-isolate at home for at least 10 days after onset of symptoms. After 10 days, if your temperature is normal and you feel better, you can return to your routine activities. Coughing may persist for several weeks, so a cough alone does not mean you need to continue to self-isolate for more than 10 days.
Here are two examples of differing self-isolation periods for returning travellers that develop respiratory symptoms upon their return:
Example 1: Respiratory symptoms appear five days after returning to Canada. Self-isolate for 10 additional days for a total of 15 days.
Example 2: Respiratory symptoms appear two days after returning to Canada. Self-isolate for 10 additional days for a total of 12 days.
最后说一下BC省新冠病毒检测标准,因为这个和新冠肺炎病人康复标准有关联。目前BC的检测标准是优先测重症病人,和出现症状的医护人员,养老院的老人,重慢性病人。其他轻症的基本不测居家自我隔离。BC省卫生官员邦妮·亨利(Bonnie Henry)博士表示,对民众进行广泛测试,只有当疫情曲线出现下降后才会进行(为什么??)
因为居家自我隔离的轻症患者不测,所以14天隔离期过后如果没有变危重自然也是不测的,这一类轻症患者“被康复“后还会不会继续传播新冠病毒应该也是不确定的,到底对社区工作环境造成多大危险也是个未知数,是不是BC的童鞋们只能靠自我保护自求多福了?
今天星期六(3月28号)一大早,刚刚结束隔离期的加拿大总理特鲁多(Justin Trudeau)宣布,任何出现新冠病毒症状的民众,都禁止乘坐加拿大境内的飞机或火车,以减缓病毒在加拿大传播。
这个限制措施于周一中午生效,适用于任何显示出新冠病毒迹象的人,包括咳嗽、发烧和呼吸困难。
出现上述症状的旅行者将不能够在加拿大任何地方的省市之间乘坐飞机或火车旅行。
特鲁多于今天早上发表对加拿大人的每日讲话中表示:“航空公司和火车的运营商要确保表现出症状的人不要登上这些火车至关重要。” “这是加拿大交通部的一项规定,与此同时,如果旅行不是绝对必要的话,请留在家里。”
总理补充指,联邦政府将为航空公司和铁路公司提供“更多工具”,以阻止那些表现出症状的人乘坐飞机和火车,但目前没有提供这些增强筛查措施的详情。
不过,特鲁多表示,该禁令不适用于省际巴士旅行,因为该旅行不受联邦政府管辖。
---你们看看,要说政府部门头头大多不知道轻症状不测的人群对社会的潜在传播病毒的危害性,我也是不太相信的,是因为检测工具不足不得已而为之?
看到谭书记这面孔就觉得讨厌,很多国家包括加拿大都被误导有些甚至被带进沟里,最终导致新冠世界大流行,谭书记功不可没。。。世卫组织刚修改规则:冠状病毒被证实气溶胶传播!在空气中可存活8个小时
世卫组织刚刚修改规则:冠状病毒被证实气溶胶传播,在空气中可存活8个小时。所以,要求每个人任何地方都得戴口罩。
爆炸性的消息:
冠状病毒被证实通过空气传播!!!
冠状病毒能在铜和钢等金属表面存活2个小时。
能在纸和塑料上存活3-4小时。
在空气中可根据具体情况存活8小时甚至更长时间。
世卫组织更正了他们早期认为冠状病毒不会空气传播的观点。
请大家不要去有空调的公共场所,尤其不要去小而密闭的房间。
这是从中国封城以来,有关这场瘟疫最有价值的消息(美国的快速度病毒检测仪)!!!!!!
一天生产五万台测试机 不靠谱
可以做五万测试 还差不多
33楼里面一天生产五万台测试机是曝光乐视老板美国资产的顾秀竞博士文章说的,我没有时间考证消息来源,应该也很容易查到的。FDA已经通过并授权!
可以想见,额温枪是基本工具之一,其它的都不好整。。。这个政策怎么实施呢?
我看还是中国的测温枪简单实用
西方国家绕了一大圈
最后还是得回到中国标准
我看一篇文章说现在一天可做五万测试
没说一天可生产五万台测试机
测试次数和测试机台数 差别挺大的
听听就好了,别认真。美国人还高调说捐赠中国一亿美金呐,到后来,不吱声了。
好贴 赞俺吃过早饭查了一下,新测试机五分钟可以测出阳性结果是真的,但是确实没说得很清楚是一天可生产五万台测试机还是测试机一天可做五万测试(我个人倾向于后者),产生歧义应该是下面这句话:
The company will ramp up its production to make 50,000 units per day beginning next week.
附全文大家看看如下:
The FDA has approved emergency use of a new coronavirus test that delivers positive results in 5 minutes and negative results in 13
Abbott Laboratories announced Friday that the FDA approved the emergency use of its new Abbott ID NOW COVID-19 test, which can deliver positive test results for the novel coronavirus in five minutes and negative results in 13.
The test — which is the size of a small toaster — is compact enough that it can be used in any health care setting, including a physician's office or urgent care clinics.
The company will ramp up its production to make 50,000 units per day beginning next week.
The US Food and Drug Administration granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to a COVID-19 test that delivers positive results in five minutes and negative results in 13 minutes.
Abbott Laboratories claims its ID NOW COVID-19 test could dramatically change the battle against the novel coronavirus in the US. The test runs on Abbott's ID NOW platform, which is the most common point-of-care test in the US. It is also used to test other viruses including Influenza A&B, Strep A and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) testing.
The medical device is small and compact enough that it can be used in nearly any healthcare setting, expanding the number of places it can be used to detect the novel virus. The medical device, which is about the size of a toaster, is portable and can be set up anywhere, from a physician's office to an urgent care clinic, the company boasted in a press release.
"Abbott's ID NOW COVID-19 test will help battle the pandemic in real-time by bringing vital information in minutes to frontline clinicians who are working to stop the spread of the virus," John Frels, vice president of research and development at Abbott Diagnostics, told Business Insider.
After Abbott Laboratories received approval from the FDA for its ID NOW COVID-19 test on Friday, the medical device company announced that it would be ramping up its production to make 50,000 units per day as early as next week. According to a spokesperson from Abbott, the tests will be available beginning on April 1.
The FDA also approved Abbott's m2000 RealTime system for coronavirus detection last week. With the two systems combined, the medical device company claims it will produce about 5 million tests for the novel virus in April.
Abbott Laboratories is working with the Trump Administration to deploy the tests to sites where they will have the most impact and will likely target hospital emergency departments, urgent-care clinics, and physicians' offices.
The Abbott ID NOW COVID-19 detects the presence of nucleic acid from SARS-CoV-2 by "identifying a small section of the virus' genome, then amplifying that portion until there's enough for detection."
The molecular testing technology delivers COVID-19 results in minutes. Other coronavirus testing methods require health workers to take samples from possible coronavirus patients to be delivered to testing labs, taking hours or even days to get results.
However, Abbott n0ted that ID NOW COVID-19 EUA is not FDA cleared or approved, meaning it can only be used by authorized laboratories and patient care settings.
According to Abbott Laboratories, its ID NOW COVID-19 test is the fastest available molecular point-of-care test. However, other companies producing medical devices with even faster testing capabilities are racing to receive approval from the FDA. Henry Schein Inc. is developing a point-of-care antibody test, however, it cannot definitely diagnose an infection, Bloomberg reported.
The US government has been criticized for its lagging response to the coronavirus, including its low testing capabilities after weeks and delays in producing its own coronavirus test. However, the testing capabilities in the US are finally beginning to catch up, resulting in a surge of confirmed cases across the country going from 32,000 on March 22 to over 100,000 today.
While the US testing capabilities are now in a better place, the healthcare system still faces extreme shortages of critical medical supplies to treat COVID-19 patients, including ventilators and personal protective gear for health workers, including masks.
确实是自求多福了,这是一个新事物,BC的做法对不对,目前没人知道,也许他们说的治愈就真没有传染性了,也许真就拦下大暴发也不一定。但大疫当前,国人的思维是宁可防疫过当,也不可防疫不到位,所以躲着别出来,保护自己,保护家人,保护所爱,永远是正确选择!
俺吃过早饭查了一下,新测试机五分钟可以测出阳性结果是真的,但是确实没说得很清楚是一天可生产五万台测试机还是测试机一天可做五万测试(我个人倾向于后者),产生歧义应该是下面这句话:
The company will ramp up its production to make 50,000 units per day beginning next week.
附全文大家看看如下:
The FDA has approved emergency use of a new coronavirus test that delivers positive results in 5 minutes and negative results in 13
Abbott Laboratories announced Friday that the FDA approved the emergency use of its new Abbott ID NOW COVID-19 test, which can deliver positive test results for the novel coronavirus in five minutes and negative results in 13.
The test — which is the size of a small toaster — is compact enough that it can be used in any health care setting, including a physician's office or urgent care clinics.
The company will ramp up its production to make 50,000 units per day beginning next week.
The US Food and Drug Administration granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to a COVID-19 test that delivers positive results in five minutes and negative results in 13 minutes.
Abbott Laboratories claims its ID NOW COVID-19 test could dramatically change the battle against the novel coronavirus in the US. The test runs on Abbott's ID NOW platform, which is the most common point-of-care test in the US. It is also used to test other viruses including Influenza A&B, Strep A and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) testing.
The medical device is small and compact enough that it can be used in nearly any healthcare setting, expanding the number of places it can be used to detect the novel virus. The medical device, which is about the size of a toaster, is portable and can be set up anywhere, from a physician's office to an urgent care clinic, the company boasted in a press release.
"Abbott's ID NOW COVID-19 test will help battle the pandemic in real-time by bringing vital information in minutes to frontline clinicians who are working to stop the spread of the virus," John Frels, vice president of research and development at Abbott Diagnostics, told Business Insider.
After Abbott Laboratories received approval from the FDA for its ID NOW COVID-19 test on Friday, the medical device company announced that it would be ramping up its production to make 50,000 units per day as early as next week. According to a spokesperson from Abbott, the tests will be available beginning on April 1.
The FDA also approved Abbott's m2000 RealTime system for coronavirus detection last week. With the two systems combined, the medical device company claims it will produce about 5 million tests for the novel virus in April.
Abbott Laboratories is working with the Trump Administration to deploy the tests to sites where they will have the most impact and will likely target hospital emergency departments, urgent-care clinics, and physicians' offices.
The Abbott ID NOW COVID-19 detects the presence of nucleic acid from SARS-CoV-2 by "identifying a small section of the virus' genome, then amplifying that portion until there's enough for detection."
The molecular testing technology delivers COVID-19 results in minutes. Other coronavirus testing methods require health workers to take samples from possible coronavirus patients to be delivered to testing labs, taking hours or even days to get results.
However, Abbott n0ted that ID NOW COVID-19 EUA is not FDA cleared or approved, meaning it can only be used by authorized laboratories and patient care settings.
According to Abbott Laboratories, its ID NOW COVID-19 test is the fastest available molecular point-of-care test. However, other companies producing medical devices with even faster testing capabilities are racing to receive approval from the FDA. Henry Schein Inc. is developing a point-of-care antibody test, however, it cannot definitely diagnose an infection, Bloomberg reported.
The US government has been criticized for its lagging response to the coronavirus, including its low testing capabilities after weeks and delays in producing its own coronavirus test. However, the testing capabilities in the US are finally beginning to catch up, resulting in a surge of confirmed cases across the country going from 32,000 on March 22 to over 100,000 today.
While the US testing capabilities are now in a better place, the healthcare system still faces extreme shortages of critical medical supplies to treat COVID-19 patients, including ventilators and personal protective gear for health workers, including masks.
俺有疑问才查找的文章,你说的有出处吗?这个数量五万说的是试剂的生产能力
检测设备18000台早就已经遍布美国
用于流感病毒的检测
因为他们要证明他们一直是正确的。一直说感染风险很低,如果一下子测出几千来,岂非自己打脸?觉得这个Henry, Dix以及温哥华市长这个团队在拿BC民众做一件非常冒险的事情。实在搞不明白他们采取非合理的方式去将曲线压平有何意义,寻找政绩?一时心理平衡?降低恐慌?因为实际曲线压根没平缓,他们仅仅是不让输入更多数据啊!他们重点测医护和养老院,但怎么不想一下这些人是怎么感染的?感染和传播源仅仅在这些地方吗?社区传播已经是事实了!
不带有色眼镜看待问题的时候,非常的彰显出您的智慧!!任何個別地區的成功,都是假成功,包括大陸。成功必須是整個地球的成功。
楼主,你可能不知道WHO的标准无症状阳性感染者属于确诊人数,但中国标准无症状阳性感染者不属于确诊病例。这些人都不算确诊当然不需要康复。无意中在网上看到一网友评论BC省的世界级抗新冠疫情:只给有限人群反复检测,家庭医生,网上医生,急诊科医生确定是新冠也不给检测,说试剂盒不够。UBC专家说可以提供2 millions检测剂,Dr. Henry 又说等曲线压平了再给检测。国际康复标准是在一定时间内连续三次检测为阴性才可以确定康复. 这边居然没症状就算康复。看看这些数字,死亡率2%,治愈率31%.看看世界上那个国家有如此高的治愈率?有特效药吗?没有,全靠自免疫力。
上面评论说的信息还不能确定是否都属实(比如说UBC专家说可以提供2 millions检测剂等),但是引起我的兴趣来对比中加(严格来说是BC省)新冠肺炎病人康复标准,哪个更可靠谱?通过网上搜刮来的资料,简单对比如下:
1.中国新冠肺炎病人康复标准:
据国家卫生健康委体改司司长梁万年介绍,中国新冠肺炎病人的标准是新冠肺炎患者在临床症状消失、体征恢复后,间隔24小时进行两次核酸检测,若结果为双阴才可出院。为防止出院后出现复阳,出院病人需接受14天医学观察。在做完进一步测试后(第三次核酸检测),才能说病人是否康复。
2.BC省新冠肺炎病人康复标准:
而對於爲什麽本省康復比率比其它省份高出甚多,BC省卫生官员邦妮·亨利(Bonnie Henry)博士說,省内許多個案都屬於輕症,而全國亦剛剛統一了有關的標準,新冠患者只要連續10日無出現症狀的人士就會被視爲已經康復,她相信,安省很快亦會相應對標準作出調整。 大概就是说新冠患者只要呼吸道症状消失10天(咳嗽可以),体温正常就算康复了,可以进行正常日常活动了。附BCCDC原文如下:
With or without a history of travel, if you have respiratory symptoms that can be managed at home, self-isolate at home for at least 10 days after onset of symptoms. After 10 days, if your temperature is normal and you feel better, you can return to your routine activities. Coughing may persist for several weeks, so a cough alone does not mean you need to continue to self-isolate for more than 10 days.
Here are two examples of differing self-isolation periods for returning travellers that develop respiratory symptoms upon their return:
Example 1: Respiratory symptoms appear five days after returning to Canada. Self-isolate for 10 additional days for a total of 15 days.
Example 2: Respiratory symptoms appear two days after returning to Canada. Self-isolate for 10 additional days for a total of 12 days.
最后说一下BC省新冠病毒检测标准,因为这个和新冠肺炎病人康复标准有关联。目前BC的检测标准是优先测重症病人,和出现症状的医护人员,养老院的老人,重慢性病人。其他轻症的基本不测居家自我隔离。BC省卫生官员邦妮·亨利(Bonnie Henry)博士表示,对民众进行广泛测试,只有当疫情曲线出现下降后才会进行(为什么??为了让疫情曲线好看?)
因为居家自我隔离的轻症患者不测,所以14天隔离期过后如果没有变危重自然也是不测的,这一类轻症患者“被康复“后还会不会继续传播新冠病毒应该也是不确定的,到底对社区工作环境造成多大危险也是个未知数,是不是BC的童鞋们只能靠自我保护自求多福了?
因为他们要证明他们一直是正确的。一直说感染风险很低,如果一下子测出几千来,岂非自己打脸?
该说想说的话,前段我都说了,现已失去最佳时机,形成流行,只有各自宅家,有病的别出去传病,没病的自己保命。待有症状的人测完、处理完(药剂,人力有限),其它人也会有机会检测的。我现已经不关心数据(每个国家都有其操控的嫌疑),只关心我的食物是否可以用得更久。
讲真的,从我前面查找出的数据可以看出,bc有能力每天测3500例以上,但是这两三天平均下来只测了2100左右,大家都知道达到需要检测的条件比较苛刻的,导致很多轻症患者不检测,隔离期完了还带不带病毒也不检测就让恢复正常生活了,这样真的好吗?我个人是有疑问的。。。所以说政客是最愚蠢和无知的,命都没了还死抓着这些没用的,到最后除了证明自己的愚蠢还能得到什么?
张文宏星期五在出席“病毒演变、进化、传播的基础研究与防治实践(从SARS到COVID-19)”研讨会时表示,人类历史上从没见过新冠病毒这么诡异的病毒,传播力很强,但是症状又不轻,介于流感和严重急性呼吸道症候群(SARS)之间,他说,“居然还有无症状携带,这就成为一个大问题”。
中国当局目前未将武汉肺炎无症状感染者列入确诊病例,张文宏警告说,当前最大风险就是无症状感染者,因为有病人从头到尾无症状,但病毒血清阳性会延续3个星期,所以快速诊断极为重要,否则大量病人会滞留在社区,暴发社区感染。
BC省更改了对治愈标准的判定,只要确诊者不再发烧,出现症状10天后不再难受, 无症状了就算治愈。这种标准是对轻症患者进行的,入院治疗及重症者仍需两次检测呈阴性后才算治愈。
Henry解释说:“我们所看到的全世界的数据,尤其是德国的数据,验证了这一点。那就是,在症状消除后经过一段时间,病人不再脱落活病毒。”(after a period of time when your symptoms resolve you no longer shed live virus)
上面是一些文章里抄来的,看来BC也有说法,还根据了德国数据。世界好多地方都有些早就没有症状,但还是阳性的病人,这些人各国好像还不认为他们是治愈,但也没证据放出去复阳的病人又传染了谁?BC的做法,真是敢为天下先,如果是正确的,是BC人的幸运,否则的话,万劫不复!生命属于自己只有一次,所以我选择不信。
然后就迫不及待说拐点出现了?每个人都有检测机会,医院容量无限大,这是最理想状态,但是现实不是这样,所以肯定要有所取舍。
重要的还是开发出简易而又准确率高的测试方法,比如自己能够在药房里就可以买到,能够当场显示检测结果的棉棒式测试,廉价可以多时间段测试,这样至少不会造成心理压力,比起以前测试结果需要2-3天,现在新开发的只要数分钟就可以出结果(还没有普及),医药专家团队的成果值得期待。纯探讨,我觉得这个病毒与目前的检测手段是否严重矛盾而且暂时无法解决?对轻症和无症状的检测准确率很差,因为体内抗体,等到可以确诊时又耽误了病情,这是这个病毒刁钻狡猾的特性。
另我发现很多人有事没事就怀疑自己中招,也许就是个感冒,一刻都不能等非要去测,对自己健康重视的心情可以理解,但会不会导致医院实在接待不了只能统一不测反而对真正中招的患者不公平,埋怨医院的同时是否加强一下民众的自律精神?不要出街、学着判断自己的健康状况等等,非常时期严格克己是对他人的善!