中国女留学生购$57000的爱玛仕只申报$710面临遣返

今天在报纸上看到中国的女留学生赵某在维多利亚大学读书,去拉斯维加斯买了5万多的爱玛仕,在进加拿大时只申报了$710被当场查出,被罚款了1万多以后,还被告到法院,有可能签证不能更新,面临遣返。

该女生只有一年就要毕业,所以上诉希望毕业之前不会被遣返,目前还在等消息。这个消息上了24hours的头版头条,真让人难受。

我的问题是:

1. 她既然是给家人买的礼品,外国人在美国购物,回到加拿大应该是不需要上税的吧?因为东西仍然会被带回中国。

2. 为何被罚了1万多以后还面临遣返,是因为说了谎话吗?是不是罚得太重了?

http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/2014/03/1...dent-wants-visa-renewed-after-dodging-customs
 
S

sob1976

Guest
回复: 中国女留学生购$57000的爱玛仕只申报$710面临遣返

今天在报纸上看到中国的女留学生赵某在维多利亚大学读书,去拉斯维加斯买了5万多的爱玛仕,在进加拿大时只申报了$710被当场查出,被罚款了1万多以后,还被告到法院,有可能签证不能更新,面临遣返。

该女生只有一年就要毕业,所以上诉希望毕业之前不会被遣返,目前还在等消息。这个消息上了24hours的头版头条,真让人难受。

我的问题是:

1. 她既然是给家人买的礼品,外国人在美国购物,回到加拿大应该是不需要上税的吧?因为东西仍然会被带回中国。

2. 为何被罚了1万多以后还面临遣返,是因为说了谎话吗?是不是罚得太重了?

http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/2014/03/1...dent-wants-visa-renewed-after-dodging-customs
1) 要上税的

2) 逃稅/走私/说谎 etc
 
回复: 中国女留学生购$57000的爱玛仕只申报$710面临遣返

她如果如实申报也还需要交$9000元的税,在美国买东西过境加拿大,然后带回中国,为什么还要交税?她只是visitor, 不是公民或永久居民啊?
无法保证她一定带回国,除非她把这个包寄放在加拿大海关保税区
 

川菜厨子

能喝半斤绝不喝二两
回复: 中国女留学生购$57000的爱玛仕只申报$710面临遣返

今天在报纸上看到中国的女留学生赵某在维多利亚大学读书,去拉斯维加斯买了5万多的爱玛仕,在进加拿大时只申报了$710被当场查出,被罚款了1万多以后,还被告到法院,有可能签证不能更新,面临遣返。

该女生只有一年就要毕业,所以上诉希望毕业之前不会被遣返,目前还在等消息。这个消息上了24hours的头版头条,真让人难受。

我的问题是:

1. 她既然是给家人买的礼品,外国人在美国购物,回到加拿大应该是不需要上税的吧?因为东西仍然会被带回中国。

2. 为何被罚了1万多以后还面临遣返,是因为说了谎话吗?是不是罚得太重了?

http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/2014/03/1...dent-wants-visa-renewed-after-dodging-customs


加拿大海关怎么知道她会不会带回中国?真有钱啊,5W的包包买给家人,好孝顺。
 

Michelle Libra

流金歲月 感恩惜福
回复: 中国女留学生购$57000的爱玛仕只申报$710面临遣返

不是居民一样要报税纳税, 我早提了, 还把政府部门上的网站公告原文贴上, 附上链接, 居然还有人跟贴骂我, 我没有回. 现在有现成案例啦. 帮人买包包可以,但是该做的事一件都不能少. 过关申报有什么难的? 如果不懂,不会问吗?
 

Michelle Libra

流金歲月 感恩惜福
回复: 中国女留学生购$57000的爱玛仕只申报$710面临遣返

A “very wealthy” Chinese national who only claimed $710 in purchases but brought back $57,000 in luxury goods from Hermes in Las Vegas has been convicted and fined following a Crown appeal.

Xiaochen Zhao, a University of Victoria student here on visa, had her charges stayed earlier on condition of community service after a judge heard she’d likely be “inadmissible” in Canada with a conviction.

In a Wednesday decision, however, the B.C. Court of Appeal disagreed. It said immigration issues “must not divert the judge” from an appropriate sentence.

The court found the frequent traveller — a 24-year-old economics student and daughter of a wealthy Beijing businessman — had twice brought back undeclared goods in the space of a month in November 2011.

Various Hermes products, “including a handbag, wallet, shoes, jewellery, scarves, and accessories” — gifts for her parents, she told the court — were undeclared when she was caught after flying back into Canada.

Paying the court-ordered fine of $10,000 wasn’t the issue. Zhao, the court heard, was in the final year of her university program and wanted to remain in Canada to finish it — with the possibility of entering a financial career in the country. The conviction would have put her status in Canada in jeopardy.

“We are not faced with the limited adjustment to an otherwise fit sentence to avoid unnecessary consequences,” Justice Edward Chiasson wrote in the appeal decision.

“This case involves abandoning a criminal sanction that is fit and substituting for it a completely different sanction because a conviction might have serious immigration implications for the offender.”

The amount of tax she would’ve had to pay if the goods were declared was $9,000.

Border authorities also order her to pay $15,400, which included penalties.

The court noted whether Zhao is deported would be for immigration authorities to decide.
没想到还是读金融的,如果是读艺术的说无知初犯求情也还可以接受因为大家都知道艺术类学生英语不好; 读金融的,已经是最后一年了, 没理由不知法. 不知道这个女生请律师了没有, 花多点钱请律师也许还有机会.
 
回复: 中国女留学生购$57000的爱玛仕只申报$710面临遣返

unonuthin • an hour ago
Kick her @$$ out of Canada. Ban her from any further education in Canada. Post her picture all over the map and make her an example for other foreign students that think they can take advantage of their situation here. A mistake is one think, but the amount of this offence is hard to call a mistake. It's stupid, how did she even get through grade school.
• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
JimVancouver • an hour ago
She is a criminal who plans to work in the financial industry. Perfect example of someone we don't want associated with Canada. Revoke her visa and work with the University of Victory to expel her on violation of the schools policy regarding professional behaviour.
• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Michael Yun • 3 hours ago
Kick her out of Canada! She clearly is avoiding paying tax. Set this as an example so another other visa student will think twice next time they try to pull something like this.
5 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Heisenberg • 5 hours ago
the visa should be cancelled, this is not the type of person Canada should be admitting regardless based on previous criminal behavior. rather than uphold the laws the one judge was quite happy to circumvent them so that this person could not be inconvenienced by Canadian laws.
8 • Reply•Share ›
 
回复: 中国女留学生购$57000的爱玛仕只申报$710面临遣返

故意撒谎吧,很不诚信,没什么可惜的,这种人学的越多越害人
 
S

sob1976

Guest
回复: 中国女留学生购$57000的爱玛仕只申报$710面临遣返

今天在报纸上看到中国的女留学生赵某在维多利亚大学读书,去拉斯维加斯买了5万多的爱玛仕,在进加拿大时只申报了$710被当场查出,被罚款了1万多以后,还被告到法院,有可能签证不能更新,面临遣返。

该女生只有一年就要毕业,所以上诉希望毕业之前不会被遣返,目前还在等消息。这个消息上了24hours的头版头条,真让人难受。

我的问题是:

1. 她既然是给家人买的礼品,外国人在美国购物,回到加拿大应该是不需要上税的吧?因为东西仍然会被带回中国。

2. 为何被罚了1万多以后还面临遣返,是因为说了谎话吗?是不是罚得太重了?

http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/2014/03/1...dent-wants-visa-renewed-after-dodging-customs
多利亚大学经济系也不是什么特别牛的专业...毕业后未必可以进入加拿大的金融业(尤其是外国人)。
 
回复: 中国女留学生购$57000的爱玛仕只申报$710面临遣返

美国买,然后直寄中国不用交税,不过要买保险。
本地人也有很多瞒报的,不过没这么有钱,胆也没这么大,这么贵的东西不敢。
 
回复: 中国女留学生购$57000的爱玛仕只申报$710面临遣返

美国买,然后直寄中国不用交税,不过要买保险。
本地人也有很多瞒报的,不过没这么有钱,胆也没这么大,这么贵的东西不敢。

是啊,这丫头胆子不是一般的大,不过能买得起这么贵的包,估计也无所谓,回国去怎么都过得好。
 

注册或登录来发表评论

您必须是注册会员才可以发表评论

注册帐号

注册帐号. 太容易了!

登录

已有帐号? 在这里登录.

Similar threads

顶部