霜岳贴的，小和尚有啥说法呢？
由冠军系的戈登鸽想到的......
- 主题发起人 小和尚
- 发布时间 2014-07-04
打惯了19当头的误打成1912年去世，实际上此加拿大教授应该是2012年去世。
其实他很不容易，在大家忌讳的专题里搞研究。
其实他很不容易，在大家忌讳的专题里搞研究。
俺现在在看这个人的Wikipedia....
嘴还挺硬，我没有表示出科学能力，为什么不能把逻辑放在嘴上呢，逻辑能力还是体现了一点吧，请指教
请允许我在问你一次您没有正面回答的问题，下面你给出的两个问句是否存在偷换概念的问题？？？
只要您给出正面回答，我在这个帖子里就不再跟你的贴了，好吧
别不屑回答哦
既然“情绪不稳定的容易冲动而过早死亡”，那请问你怎么知道这些过早死亡的是“情绪不稳定的容易冲动”的？
既然已经早死被淘汰了，也就没有后代留存至今，小和尚是怎么知道这些混血儿“情绪不稳定、容易冲动”呢？
请允许我在问你一次您没有正面回答的问题，下面你给出的两个问句是否存在偷换概念的问题？？？
只要您给出正面回答，我在这个帖子里就不再跟你的贴了，好吧
别不屑回答哦
既然“情绪不稳定的容易冲动而过早死亡”，那请问你怎么知道这些过早死亡的是“情绪不稳定的容易冲动”的？
既然已经早死被淘汰了，也就没有后代留存至今，小和尚是怎么知道这些混血儿“情绪不稳定、容易冲动”呢？
很多科学家搞的研究都是“大家忌讳”的。这个没什么关系。“大家”是不可靠的一个东西。要因为“大家”忌讳就不容易，科学研究做不下去了。
关键还是看，方法有木有问题，论据可不可靠。
关键还是看，方法有木有问题，论据可不可靠。
还没看完呢，大家别急着下结论，
我这两天忙得屁颠屁颠，主要精力放在验证美国是否复苏上面了，跟投资钱有关系的事是大事，所以每天几乎3点睡觉，感觉有点累。
连前天装的电脑服务器Win Office 淘宝买两个激活码也就十来分钟的事情也都拖着，再二十天就过期了，要重装。
你自己看看维基吧，和尚，算是比较中肯的，再看看他的部分摘要，基本上可以得出他的言论有没有信服力了。。。
我的结论是此人政治挂帅，也是先有结论再找论据。。。
只是他披上了学术的外衣，夹带点私货，杀伤力很大。。。
你同意俺与否不重要啦。。
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Philippe_Rushton
One of his many critics is the evolutionary biologistJoseph L. Graves, who has done extensive testing of the r/K selection theory with species of Drosophila flies. Graves argues that not only is r/K selection theory considered to be virtually useless when applied to human life history evolution, but Rushton does not apply the theory correctly, and displays a lack of understanding of evolutionary theory in general.[29]Graves also says that Rushton misrepresented the sources for the biological data he gathered in support of his hypothesis, and that much of his social science data was collected by dubious means. Other scholars have argued against Rushton's hypothesis on the basis that the concept of race is not supported by genetic evidence about the diversity of human populations, and that his research was based on folk taxonomies.[30] A number of later studies by Rushton and other researchers have argued that there is empirical support for the theory.[31][32][33] Psychologist David P. Barash notes that r- and K-selection may have some validity when considering the so-called demographic transition, whereby economic development characteristically leads to reduced family size and other K traits. "But this is a pan-human phenomenon, a flexible, adaptive response to changed environmental conditions...Rushton wields r- and K-selection as a Procrustean bed, doing what he can to make the available data fit[...]. Bad science and virulent racial prejudice drip like pus from nearly every page of this despicable book."[34]
此人还有一个奇葩理论，说穆斯林不是文化差异（这点俺同意），而是基因问题（这个就奇葩了）。。
我的结论是此人政治挂帅，也是先有结论再找论据。。。
只是他披上了学术的外衣，夹带点私货，杀伤力很大。。。
你同意俺与否不重要啦。。
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Philippe_Rushton
One of his many critics is the evolutionary biologistJoseph L. Graves, who has done extensive testing of the r/K selection theory with species of Drosophila flies. Graves argues that not only is r/K selection theory considered to be virtually useless when applied to human life history evolution, but Rushton does not apply the theory correctly, and displays a lack of understanding of evolutionary theory in general.[29]Graves also says that Rushton misrepresented the sources for the biological data he gathered in support of his hypothesis, and that much of his social science data was collected by dubious means. Other scholars have argued against Rushton's hypothesis on the basis that the concept of race is not supported by genetic evidence about the diversity of human populations, and that his research was based on folk taxonomies.[30] A number of later studies by Rushton and other researchers have argued that there is empirical support for the theory.[31][32][33] Psychologist David P. Barash notes that r- and K-selection may have some validity when considering the so-called demographic transition, whereby economic development characteristically leads to reduced family size and other K traits. "But this is a pan-human phenomenon, a flexible, adaptive response to changed environmental conditions...Rushton wields r- and K-selection as a Procrustean bed, doing what he can to make the available data fit[...]. Bad science and virulent racial prejudice drip like pus from nearly every page of this despicable book."[34]
此人还有一个奇葩理论，说穆斯林不是文化差异（这点俺同意），而是基因问题（这个就奇葩了）。。
小芳也参与了，俺得搬板凳挨这坐着看“球赛”。
方医生什么时候开始看维基决定百事，而不是具体看论文？
维基正文里面那些[1][2][76][98]...对应的是下面的出处----很多就是论文。
哎，这类话题，俺觉得不用驳的，
俺其实是想来骗小和尚上张照片的。。。。
不料忍不住开口了，就上了船，刚被迫火速看了无数东西，眼睛大脑有点受不了，想吐了。。。。
就算小和尚帅过吴启华，有裸体片，俺也不想看了。。。
内伤了。。。
小和尚，算你赢了。。。
俺看电视去了。。。
太不坚强了。记批评一次。
今天先到这儿。
不知道你的逻辑能力表现在哪里？选边站还是视而不见？你说的问题我早就正面回答了，根据小和尚的“非最佳即淘汰”理论，很容易得出我的推论，所以不存在偷换概念的问题。如果你只会抠字眼，我对你的逻辑能力当然要表示怀疑。
最后编辑: 2014-07-05
谢谢，我没觉得我有多尴尬，你反复帖一样的东西，而我都回答过了，比如你把智商作为衡量优秀与否的最高标准，我对此有不同意见，而你视而不见，回答不出只能虚构我和方医生的家人的糗事，你的人品是大大的坏了。
野科之流，倒是抛出不少歪理邪说欺蒙世人，本来连那个“科”字都不忍给嫩用，想想也罢便宜嫩了，搞了恁多指鹿为马、左鞋右穿的“考证”，混个野科头衔倒也般配 。。。
不过嫩滴那些考证，只配丢进网络垃圾站、冷冻室，哈想流芳百世就算了，恐怕喷都喷不出二里地 。。。
注册或登录来发表评论
您必须是注册会员才可以发表评论
注册帐号
注册帐号. 太容易了!
登录
已有帐号? 在这里登录.
Similar threads
2024-09-23有新回复
全楼:0.04
科幻世界
2022-08-21有新赞
全楼:0.00
xchn818
