既然是政治运动,后台的两股或多股政治力量的较量就是必然的。从这点来讲,说学生被‘利用’也是对的。学生本身当然不会想到夺权,他们至少看到社会不公希望改变。但改变一定要通过不同政治力量间的制衡,妥协才能达到。夺权?夺谁的权?学生把朝腊肉扔颜料鸡蛋的人马上控制,交给了警察。连腊肉都不否定,怎么可能夺共党的权。学生和普通百姓的诉求不过是反官倒,要民主而已,动到了“让自己家里人先富起起来“的利益集团的奶酪,所以被突突突了。
既然是政治运动,后台的两股或多股政治力量的较量就是必然的。从这点来讲,说学生被‘利用’也是对的。学生本身当然不会想到夺权,他们至少看到社会不公希望改变。但改变一定要通过不同政治力量间的制衡,妥协才能达到。夺权?夺谁的权?学生把朝腊肉扔颜料鸡蛋的人马上控制,交给了警察。连腊肉都不否定,怎么可能夺共党的权。学生和普通百姓的诉求不过是反官倒,要民主而已,动到了“让自己家里人先富起起来“的利益集团的奶酪,所以被突突突了。
http://www.ae911truth.org/神马,让爱国人士喜大普奔的911竟然是假的?
证据你那个什么美国制造911纯属阴谋论,没有任何证据,中共在89屠杀市民是证据确凿。
想当年俺还是个挨踢人士,天天追踪cnet的新闻。突然看到这么一个专门播报挨踢界新闻的网站的首页出现扭腰世贸大楼浓烟滚滚的照片,心中十分诧异。二十分钟之后,一个国外的格瓦拉崇拜者兴奋地打来电话说,快看,美国遭受攻击乐!央视反应也狠快,大概三个小时之后奏上新闻频道鸟。说起911真是太震撼了,当时我一边做卫生一边看香港狗血连续剧,突然就插播飞机撞大楼的画面,吓死人,然后美股大跌,美元兑英镑欧元大跌四五百点,也都太震撼了,我缓过神来也赶紧买了美元,那个恐怖时刻真的是记忆犹新!
那只能说明美国比中国掩盖的能力强
把美国扯进来就能说明中共屠杀无辜市民的正当性?那这天底下所有杀人犯只要说别人也杀过人自己就无罪了?还不用说你找的所谓证据能证明什么。证据
EVIDENCE
On September 11, 2001, the three worst structural failures in modern history took place when World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7 suffered complete and rapid destruction.
In the aftermath of the tragedy, most members of the architecture and engineering community, as well as the general public, assumed that the buildings’ destruction had occurred as a result of the airplane impacts and fires. This view was reinforced by subsequent federal investigations, culminating in FEMA’s 2002 Building Performance Study and in the 2005 and 2008 reports by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
Since 9/11, however, independent researchers around the world have assembled a large body of evidence that overwhelmingly refutes the notion that airplane impacts and fires caused the destruction of the Twin Towers and WTC 7. This body of evidence, most of which FEMA and NIST omitted from their reports, instead supports the troubling conclusion that all three skyscrapers were destroyed in a process known as “controlled demolition,” where explosives and/or other devices are used to bring down a building.
KEY EVIDENCE
- Rapid onset of destruction,
- Constant acceleration at or near free-fall through what should have been the path of greatest resistance,
- Numerous eyewitness accounts of explosions including 118 FDNY personnel,
- Lateral ejection of multi-ton steel framing members distances of 600 feet at more than 60 mph,
- Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete, and large volumes of expanding pyroclastic-like dust clouds,
- Isolated explosive ejections 20 to 60 stories below the “crush zone,”
- Total destruction and dismemberment of all three buildings, with 220 floors each an acre in size missing from the Twin Towers’ debris pile,
- Several tons of molten steel/iron found in the debris piles,
- Evidence of thermite incendiaries on steel beams,
- Nanothermite composites and iron microspheres found in WTC dust samples.
Articles by AE911Truth
The following articles discuss and analyze the evidence for explosive controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC 7. While most of these articles are intended for a general audience, the articles under “Technical Critiques of the NIST Reports” are geared toward readers with greater technical knowledge.
World Trade Center Building 7
- Evidence for the Explosive Demolition of World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11
- Freefall and Building 7 on 9/11
- How Did They Know? Examining the Foreknowledge of Building 7’s Destruction
Twin Towers
- Twin Towers Evidence Blows Away Fire Collapse Theory
- Lack of Deceleration of North Tower’s Upper Section Proves Use of Explosives
- What was the Molten Metal Seen Pouring Out of the South Tower Minutes Before its Collapse?
- High Temperatures, Persistent Heat & 'Molten Steel' at WTC Site Contradict Official Story
- Billions of Previously Molten Iron Spheres in WTC Dust, Reveal Use of Thermitic Materials
- Advanced Pyrotechnic or Explosive Material Discovered in WTC Dust
- Evidence Destroyed is Justice Denied
Technical Critiques of the NIST Reports
- 25 Points of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports
- [PDF]
- The NIST Analyses - A Close Look at WTC 7
- How NIST Avoided a Real Analysis of the Physical Evidence of WTC Steel
Critique of Popular Mechanics
The Psychology of 9/11
- Psychology Experts Speak Out: “Why is the 9/11 Evidence Difficult for Some to Accept?”
- [PDF]
- Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11? A 20-Part Series
- [PDF]
Table of World Trade Center Tower A Drawings
Table of World Trade Center Tower A Architectural Drawings
Table of World Trade Center Tower A Electrical Drawings
Other Technical Articles
脑子是个好东西,可惜你没有证据
EVIDENCE
On September 11, 2001, the three worst structural failures in modern history took place when World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7 suffered complete and rapid destruction.
In the aftermath of the tragedy, most members of the architecture and engineering community, as well as the general public, assumed that the buildings’ destruction had occurred as a result of the airplane impacts and fires. This view was reinforced by subsequent federal investigations, culminating in FEMA’s 2002 Building Performance Study and in the 2005 and 2008 reports by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
Since 9/11, however, independent researchers around the world have assembled a large body of evidence that overwhelmingly refutes the notion that airplane impacts and fires caused the destruction of the Twin Towers and WTC 7. This body of evidence, most of which FEMA and NIST omitted from their reports, instead supports the troubling conclusion that all three skyscrapers were destroyed in a process known as “controlled demolition,” where explosives and/or other devices are used to bring down a building.
KEY EVIDENCE
- Rapid onset of destruction,
- Constant acceleration at or near free-fall through what should have been the path of greatest resistance,
- Numerous eyewitness accounts of explosions including 118 FDNY personnel,
- Lateral ejection of multi-ton steel framing members distances of 600 feet at more than 60 mph,
- Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete, and large volumes of expanding pyroclastic-like dust clouds,
- Isolated explosive ejections 20 to 60 stories below the “crush zone,”
- Total destruction and dismemberment of all three buildings, with 220 floors each an acre in size missing from the Twin Towers’ debris pile,
- Several tons of molten steel/iron found in the debris piles,
- Evidence of thermite incendiaries on steel beams,
- Nanothermite composites and iron microspheres found in WTC dust samples.
Articles by AE911Truth
The following articles discuss and analyze the evidence for explosive controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC 7. While most of these articles are intended for a general audience, the articles under “Technical Critiques of the NIST Reports” are geared toward readers with greater technical knowledge.
World Trade Center Building 7
- Evidence for the Explosive Demolition of World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11
- Freefall and Building 7 on 9/11
- How Did They Know? Examining the Foreknowledge of Building 7’s Destruction
Twin Towers
- Twin Towers Evidence Blows Away Fire Collapse Theory
- Lack of Deceleration of North Tower’s Upper Section Proves Use of Explosives
- What was the Molten Metal Seen Pouring Out of the South Tower Minutes Before its Collapse?
- High Temperatures, Persistent Heat & 'Molten Steel' at WTC Site Contradict Official Story
- Billions of Previously Molten Iron Spheres in WTC Dust, Reveal Use of Thermitic Materials
- Advanced Pyrotechnic or Explosive Material Discovered in WTC Dust
- Evidence Destroyed is Justice Denied
Technical Critiques of the NIST Reports
- 25 Points of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports
- [PDF]
- The NIST Analyses - A Close Look at WTC 7
- How NIST Avoided a Real Analysis of the Physical Evidence of WTC Steel
Critique of Popular Mechanics
The Psychology of 9/11
- Psychology Experts Speak Out: “Why is the 9/11 Evidence Difficult for Some to Accept?”
- [PDF]
- Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11? A 20-Part Series
- [PDF]
Table of World Trade Center Tower A Drawings
Table of World Trade Center Tower A Architectural Drawings
Table of World Trade Center Tower A Electrical Drawings
Other Technical Articles