- 主题发起人 盘古
- 发布时间 2017-09-19
还是那句话，你厌恶不厌恶没人care 西方国家是民主社会，大多数人的意志决定了社会的走向。西方社会经过几百年的发展，已经到了现在这个阶段，你不接受，你可以去抗议，可以去叫骂。 白人里面比你反同的多了去了，专门杀同性恋的人都有。结果呢？same sex marriage还不是一个个国家的通过了。连台湾都通过了。所以社会进步的洪流不是一两个人就能抵挡的住的。你在这里再喊几百万遍，也不过是重复别人说过千百万遍的话。你在这里讨论的，人家西方主流社会老早就辩论了几十年了。结果已经呈现在你面前了。你现在所做的只是螳臂当车而已，把自己变得更加不受欢迎。当然这是你自己的自由。你愿意失去朋友，愿意一个人孤零零的和所有人斗，这是你自己的选择。得道者多助，失道者寡助，你硬是选择寡助的路，我们能把你怎么样。只能说好走不送了
只想告诉你，我进我们公司的第一天（世界TOP5 IT 公司）， HR 培训的时候就明确讲了，如果有人敢在公司里面因为你的性别，种族，性取向而歧视你， 搜集证据，报告经理。严重者直接开除。我们公司里面高管，公开的同性恋不少。苹果老总也是公开的同性恋。你在这里蹦的欢，说这种话，如果有人知道你的真实身份，翻译成英文，可以让你没大公司录取你，没大公司聘用你。这就是加拿大。凡是像样的公司知道你公开说这种话都不会聘用的。已经录取的直接被裁掉。
这就是加拿大。你不喜欢加拿大政治正确，你可以去公开骂， 公开反对，言论自由。但是你没法阻止别人拉黑你。
你怎么样，我倒是不担心。我倒是担心你子女的。在你这种家庭范围里长大，你子女如果口无遮拦，在外面和你一样咋咋呼呼的反同。恐怕你子女的前程都会受到严重影响。反正我们公司进来的刚毕业的大学生，如果给我听到有谁敢说种族歧视，反同的话，立马我让他按照公司章程走人。
最后编辑: 2017-09-22
最扯淡就是"自认为"。
别把同性恋群体的地位捧得那么高。如果同性恋的应聘者有着非常超值的工作能力和极强的智慧，他或者她可以进入到那种凭真本事工作的公司里。如果是政府或者公立学校，公立医院这种吃财政饭的单位，应娉者的智慧一般般的情况下，用人单位还是不选择同性恋的应娉者，老板担心这类特殊人进到单位，会给自己惹来很多麻烦的。大部分员工都不是同性恋，突然招进来一个怪异的同性恋者，大部分的异性恋者会对老板有意见的。工作还开展不开展了？不能因为一个奇特的人物，影响整个团队的工作效率的。
维基这么说c16，
The summary of Bill C-16 is as follows:
The bill is intended to protect individuals from discrimination within the sphere of federal jurisdiction and from being the targets of hate propaganda,[4] as a consequence of their gender identity or their gender expression. The bill adds “gender identity or expression” to the list of prohibited grounds of discrimination in the Canadian Human Rights Act and the list of characteristics of identifiable groups protected from hate propaganda in the Criminal Code. It also adds that evidence that an offence was motivated by bias, prejudice or hate based on a person’s gender identity or expression constitutes an aggravating circumstance for a court to consider when imposing a criminal sentence.[5]
跟厕所有什么关系？ 哪儿说了男的可以上女厕所？
它反对的， 是楼主这种公开讨厌同性恋的行为。
这里有篇文章， 讲c279对厕所的影响，
What impact would this Bill have on public bathrooms and other sex-segregated spaces?
In debate over Bill C-279, some concerns have been raised that the amendments it proposes could somehow enable cisgender men to access women-only spaces, such as public bathrooms, putting women and children at risk of sexual exploitation. This is completely false. In no way would Bill C-279 impact existing Criminal Code provisions that protect against harm, abuse and exploitation. It will not enable people to gain access to sex-segregated spaces in which they do not belong, nor will it inhibit the courts’ ability to prosecute and convict those who perpetrate harm, abuse or exploitation.
These concerns often center on the case of Christopher Hambrook, a man who claimed to be transgender in order to gain access to a women’s shelter in Toronto where he sexually assaulted two women in January and February 2012. While Mr. Hambrook’s actions were horrendous, there was no relation between his crimes and Ontario’s human rights protections for trans people.
As it stands, Mr. Hambrook was duly convicted for his crimes, and sentenced to prison indefinitely. There is no evidence to suggest that the application of the Criminal Code would change in any way should explicit protections based on gender identity be adopted.
http://trans.egale.ca/faq-about-c-279/
跟厕所毫无关系，
最后编辑: 2017-09-23
