最近关注Jay Peak项目,找他们要了job calculation的文件。详细的表格我就不贴了,最关键的几个数字是:
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Job from Operation: 1 year 587; 2 year 627;
Job for Development: 1 year 1296
然后我自己一算前两年平均job是1256,而这个项目是给134名投资者的。于是赶紧发信问律师,然后律师直接给RC发信,得到答复如下:
[/FONT][FONT="]The indirect job numbers aren’t averaged but instead broken out in to two distinct components ? those created during a one time development phase (1,296) and those created during the project operations phase. Since most I-829 petitions would likely be filed during the second year and entering the third year of project business operations, the total indirect jobs created by the project would be the combined totals of 1,296 created during development and 627 from year 2 operations for a total of 1,923 indirect jobs.
就是说再递交829的时候,job是把Development的1296加上第二年的operation一起算,总数1923超过。而Developement阶段根据表格只持续一年。不知道这种解释是否合理?还是说俺被忽悠了?
多谢!
[/FONT]
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Job from Operation: 1 year 587; 2 year 627;
Job for Development: 1 year 1296
然后我自己一算前两年平均job是1256,而这个项目是给134名投资者的。于是赶紧发信问律师,然后律师直接给RC发信,得到答复如下:
[/FONT][FONT="]The indirect job numbers aren’t averaged but instead broken out in to two distinct components ? those created during a one time development phase (1,296) and those created during the project operations phase. Since most I-829 petitions would likely be filed during the second year and entering the third year of project business operations, the total indirect jobs created by the project would be the combined totals of 1,296 created during development and 627 from year 2 operations for a total of 1,923 indirect jobs.
就是说再递交829的时候,job是把Development的1296加上第二年的operation一起算,总数1923超过。而Developement阶段根据表格只持续一年。不知道这种解释是否合理?还是说俺被忽悠了?
多谢!
[/FONT]