说温哥华是国际大都市的进来看看

https://vancouverflippersintrouble.wordpress.com/2015/05/19/how-world-class-is-vancouver/
One of the favourite justifications for high housing prices in Vancouver is, “we’re cheap compared to other world-class cities like Paris, Tokyo, London, New York, etc.”. In fact, Housing Minister Rich Coleman (following up on his comments from last week) gave this response a few days ago when asked about foreign ownership in Vancouver.

“I believe that the market place adjusts. If you notice over the years, it has fluctuations up and fluctuations down. If you look at the mean cost of housing across British Columbia and you compare it to other major cities worldwide, the reason it is attractive internationally is because it’s actually pretty reasonable compared to other cities like London, Singapore, Tokyo”

But is Vancouver really comparable to those cities?

Population

How does Vancouver compare to those other cities when it comes to metropolitan area population?

  • Tokyo: 34,607,069
  • New York: 20,092,883
  • London: 13,879,757
  • Paris: 11,978,363
  • Western Canada: 10,394,228 (west of Ontario)
  • Pittsburgh: 2,356,285
  • Vancouver: 2,313,328
  • Portland: 2,226,009
When it comes to population, Vancouver is not even close to the usual comparison cities. In fact, Tokyo, New York, London and Paris all have higher populations than Western Canada. On the list of North American Metropolitan Areas, Vancouver ranks 35th — right between Pittsburgh and Portland.

World City Rankings

The Globalization and World Cities Research Network has a methodology for ranking world cities. In their most recent analysis, the top four cities were: London, New York, Hong Kong and Paris. Vancouver ranks more than 60 places lower, most comparable to: Caracas, Riyadh, Chennai and Manchester.

A.T. Kearney compiles a Global Cities Index (GCI), which “examines a comprehensive list of 84 cities on every continent, measuring how globally engaged they are across 26 metrics in five dimensions: business activity, human capital, information exchange, cultural experience, and political engagement”. The usual comparison cities are all at the top. Vancouver ranked 48th.



The 3 most visited museums in the world are in Paris, New York and London. The Vancouver art gallery didn’t make the top 100.

Of the four major cross-border North American sports leagues (MLB, NBA, NHL, MLS), Vancouver has 2 teams and 0 championships. New York has 8 teams and 41 championships. Vancouver briefly had an NBA franchise, but lost it to fellow world-class city Memphis, Tennessee.

New York has Broadway, London has the West End, Vancouver has Granville Street?

Reasonable Comparisons

Vancouver is simply not in the same league as the truly world-class cities with which it is often compared. Two much more comparable cities are Portland and Seattle (similar populations, weather, natural beauty, etc.). So, how do these three cities compare when it comes to median house prices?

  • Vancouver: $704,800 CAD
  • Seattle: $359,100 USD
  • Portland: $291,300 USD
Sure, Vancouver is cheaper than truly world-class cities. But compared to similar cities, it is extremely overpriced.
 
这篇文章很好的把温哥华的位置给摆正了。看到很多人很多人把温哥华和纽约,伦敦,巴黎,甚至北京上海相比。实际上,温哥华只能算和波特兰差不多的二三线北美城市。处于各种各样的原因(根本原因是过去二十年来加拿大相比美国宽松很多的移民政策),这个城市成为了世界各地,特别是港台大陆华人眼中的香饽饽。
 
首先比较了人口,纽约,伦敦,巴黎都是千万以上的人口,温哥华只有两百多万人。。人口和美国波特兰差不多。。。世界上有两百万人口的国际大都市吗?
 
经济方面不用提了,温哥华显然不是国际大都市的GDP。那么看看艺术馆,相比纽约的大都会等等真正国际大都市的艺术馆,温哥华的艺术馆都没有排上世界前100
 
然后比较体育,在北美这个注重体育的地区,一个城市体育发展的如何,也能反应这个城市的繁荣与否,因为球队后面就是各种财阀的角力,球队越多,这个城市经济越繁荣。纽约有8个球队,41个冠军,温哥华两个球队,0个冠军。
 
最后比较房价,温哥华均价是70万刀(今年80万刀了吧),而同样人口的美国城市波特兰只有29万刀。即使温哥华比波特兰高端,两倍多的房价也是不可思议。
 
总结,温哥华和国际一线大都市相比,房屋均价有的一拼。但是这是应该的,因为经济体量差距太大。但是温哥华和同样人口经济差不多的北美二三线城市相比,房屋价格被远远高估
 
楼主,不管比什么都没用, 比有没有人要才是硬道理。
自由市场的机制就是供需的平衡, 有供无需就是西雅图跟波特兰目前的状况, 有需无供就是世界各大城市以及温哥华目前的状况, 跟什么统计都无关, 拿人口数,房价值来相比,更是不懂统计这门科学的外行人硬讲的不内行话。
 
楼主,不管比什么都没用, 比有没有人要才是硬道理。
自由市场的机制就是供需的平衡, 有供无需就是西雅图跟波特兰目前的状况, 有需无供就是世界各大城市以及温哥华目前的状况, 跟什么统计都无关, 拿人口数,房价值来相比,更是不懂统计这门科学的外行人硬讲的不内行话。
最近温哥华媒体热炒房屋可负担的话题,这话你跟加拿大媒体和本地愤怒的老百姓讲去。五月24号12pm温哥华艺术馆门前有房屋可负担问题的游行集会,参与的都是本地加拿大白人,还有部分CBC,预计上百号人,主要就是抗议本地政府不作为,要求限制外国人买房的政策出台。人家已经闹集会了,你和他们说去,和我说又没用
 
最后编辑: 2015-05-21

小和尚

最爱妹的小和尚
楼主,不管比什么都没用, 比有没有人要才是硬道理。
自由市场的机制就是供需的平衡, 有供无需就是西雅图跟波特兰目前的状况, 有需无供就是世界各大城市以及温哥华目前的状况, 跟什么统计都无关, 拿人口数,房价值来相比,更是不懂统计这门科学的外行人硬讲的不内行话。

楼主没错
既然题目是这样起的,就得拿国际大都市的要素来比,比如地铁,比如大公司......
而不是宜居城市的要素,或者宜“移”城市的要素 (宜“移“要素包括移民方便,富豪税负合理),和宜居不尽相同,
这是三个不同的概念,有重合部分,分歧部分也不小。
 
最后编辑: 2015-05-21

还叫鱼头

就是一个鱼头
楼主,不管比什么都没用, 比有没有人要才是硬道理。
自由市场的机制就是供需的平衡, 有供无需就是西雅图跟波特兰目前的状况, 有需无供就是世界各大城市以及温哥华目前的状况, 跟什么统计都无关, 拿人口数,房价值来相比,更是不懂统计这门科学的外行人硬讲的不内行话。
丝丝的专业是什么呀?
 

注册或登录来发表评论

您必须是注册会员才可以发表评论

注册帐号

注册帐号. 太容易了!

登录

已有帐号? 在这里登录.

Similar threads

顶部