北美15年

hualala

哗啦啦
关于恐怖分子想借难民之名进入美国的一些认识上常识上的误区,前天读了一篇文章,摘几段贴到这里,
希望对坛子里的某些狭隘的偏激的言论能有所启发和触动:
Entering the U.S. as refugees would be the hardest way for would-be terrorists

Were any of the Paris attackers refugees?


As of now, none of the Paris attackers have been confirmed as having entered Europe as refugees.

In fact, most of the Paris attackers were European citizens born in France or Belgium. Two of them appear to have entered Europe through Greece although it doesn't appear that they came in through a refugee program.

A Syrian passport found next to one of the attackers' bodies stoked fears that the man had been a refugee. That has not yet been confirmed, although top European officials have suggested the passport was doctored, which raises its own set of questions, but does not confirm the suspected attacker was a refugee. Others have definitively been shown to be European citizens.

Perhaps more importantly, the European refugee admission system is dramatically different from the U.S. system for Syrians, in large part because the U.S. is geographically separated from Syria. The U.S. has the opportunity to do far more vetting before refugees arrive on their shores.

How does a refugee get into the U.S.?
Refugees must undergo an 18- to 24-month screening process, minimum, that the United Nations' refugee arm oversees. And that's before individual countries even begin to consider a refugee's application and conduct their own additional interviews and background checks.

The screening process generally includes multiple interviews, background checks and an extensive cross-referencing process that tests refugee's stories against others and accounts from sources on the ground in their home country.

Throughout that process, U.N. officials and local government officials in temporary host countries like Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon look to determine the legitimacy of asylum seekers' claims and ensure that they meet the criteria of a refugee, including that they are not and have not been involved in any fighting or terrorist activities.

Refugees also have their retinas scanned and have their fingerprints lifted.

Christopher Boian, a spokesman for the United Nations High Commission for Refugees, called the process "stringent" and "long and complex."
So after they go through that process by the U.N., the U.S. does an additional screening?

That's right. After a rigorous screening process and several interviews carried out by the U.N. refugee agency, refugees the U.S. agrees to consider for resettlement have to undergo an additional interview, medical evaluation and security screening.

According to one U.S. government official, there's an additional layer of vetting that's specific to Syrian applicants, including special briefings for interviewers and information from the U.S. intelligence community.

The security screening involves checks against several government agencies' databases and terrorist watch lists using biographic and biometric information. It's a process Mark Toner, a State Department spokesman, recently called "the most stringent security process for anyone entering the United States."

And Syrian refugees get an additional, more targeted layer of screening involving the U.S. Intelligence agency, according to a government official.

 
读了,美国的境外screening时间要18-24个月,除去several interviews, 档案转入美国后,入境前的interview 加情报局的直接干预背景调查,已然防范到如此地步,比你我深知更多内幕的26州长尚且极力反对~

而我们是要在仅存的一个月里迅速引进2万5难民,以你评价过的加拿大政府机构的懒惰拖拉办事不力的作风,像我这类比较开明的都无法接受,更何况几个极端网友?
 
16亿~
我同意这句话“有温和的穆斯林,却没有温和的伊斯兰教义”
我同情难民,谴责滥杀无辜,鄙视欺凌弱小,反对种族歧视。
从内部来看,如果伊斯兰世界自己不改革,不自救的话,只会走上更为极端的道路。
外部的干预都是有限的,而且反作用也很大。所以我为中国这次在安理会投反对票点赞!

事件讨论以来,我读过的最好的帖子,色哥V5 ~~
 
前不久转的一篇文章,我觉得写的不错。
我理解概括一下就是“在西方价值体系主导下的全球多元文化并存是有条件的。”
一旦这种主导局面被打破,各种冲突无法避免。正义与邪恶、先进与落后、文明与野蛮的理解取决于你的立场。
文中的一些概念例如“亚洲价值”“新种族隔绝主义”都挺让我耳目一新的。
链接如下:
http://mp.iask.ca/s?__biz=MjM5NTUxO...rom=timeline&isappinstalled=0#wechat_redirect
 

注册或登录来发表评论

您必须是注册会员才可以发表评论

注册帐号

注册帐号. 太容易了!

登录

已有帐号? 在这里登录.

Similar threads

顶部