之前的记录完全看不到？
TFSA说我多买了，
- 主题发起人 fierysteed
- 发布时间 2018-08-19
fierysteed
曾经市高考状元
登录后，点击RRSP and TFSA, 点击 Tax Free Saving Account （TFSA), 点击 Transaction Summary, 选择日期，就可以看到以前的记录了。
fierysteed
曾经市高考状元
最后编辑: 2018-08-19
你如果有交易记录的话，证实没有多交，复印交易记录和税局的信，写信给税局要求重审。如果你在加拿大，亲自到税局。
那就打电话问吧，你有中文服务吗？我遇到事情都是直接到银行，认识几个银行人。
fierysteed
曾经市高考状元
非常不喜欢打电话，尤其是越洋电话，听不清楚，我也没有记录，还有很变扭的时差
比较喜欢email。有条理很清楚。可惜他没有email服务。
我已经找到一个加拿大认识的会计，做有偿服务。
fierysteed
曾经市高考状元
肯定要reassessment的，因为这个8500/month 完全是感觉对方想知道我什么数据 但是又没有，然后给了个最大的值。
fierysteed
曾经市高考状元
另外我加拿大的账户有可能已经被我cancel了，我记得走之前，我把钱都转到澳洲银行账户，然后叫银行职员帮我取消掉，但是不知道有没有取消掉。
这样查起来更加麻烦。
加拿大和澳大利亚的银行都很弱， 在对方国家几乎没有分行。
这样查起来更加麻烦。
加拿大和澳大利亚的银行都很弱， 在对方国家几乎没有分行。
加拿大人对面对面的人很尊重，电话、email、信件的互动性一个比一个差，付费的也好不了多少，加拿大人办事视乎能胡则胡，而且必有错误。
最后编辑: 2018-08-19
fierysteed
曾经市高考状元
我印象最深的是，我在某一个季度多付了钱，按说在balance里面有credit，第二个季度就少付了。结果它按我第二个季度少付的钱还charge我利息，却并没有把第一个季度的credit去补平第二个季度。那次之后就觉得CRA非常贪婪。任何帐都是往自己最多的方向算。而且不求证不询问数据。
那一定是有人出错了，不要慌，在加拿大遇到事情不可怕，处理好不留后遗症才是正道，找专业服务破财消灾吧。
我感觉cra还是很理性的，你只要有问题，他们都会有理有据地和你解释清楚，让你哑口无言的。
我觉得你已经到了彻底选一个最适合的地方定居的时候了，其他地方的一切都可以断掉，集中精力。
fierysteed
曾经市高考状元
如果我可以选择，我选择湾区
fierysteed
曾经市高考状元
既然已经有目标了，那就采取行动去实现它呀。我现在什么糊涂心思都不想，一心在多伦多发掘资源，感觉越来越好，越来越得心应手。
fierysteed
曾经市高考状元
祝你健康长寿
你最好断绝其他不必要的联系，首先断了与中国的，然后加拿大的，最后澳大利亚的，你只存一个想法：湾区。人的能力虽然有限，但是如果能扬长避短，集中精力各个击破，以你的智商一定能实现目标的。
我估计能长寿，第一我是坏人，都说好人不长寿，第二我脑体结合，心脏各项指标均优，第三加拿大医疗可保证想死也不容易。
楼主你可以向政府这个机构投诉：
https://www.canada.ca/en/taxpayers-ombudsman/services/submit-complaint/submit-complaint.html
这是今天The Globe and Mail 的报道：
The Office of the Taxpayers' Ombudsman is probing whether the Canada Revenue Agency is embracing the commitments of its Taxpayer Bill of Rights.
(You’re allowed a satisfied chuckle here if you’ve ever had a dispute with the CRA.)
Taxpayers' Ombudsman Sherra Profit has announced a “systemic examination” to find out whether the CRA is “effectively integrating the rights and values” of the bill of rights into its operations.
It appears she's not convinced.
"The review began, in part, due to my outreach visits with the CRA regional offices across Canada," Ms Profit said.
"During these discussions, it often appeared many employees were not familiar with the Taxpayer Bill of Rights," she added.
“I also found ... there was no mechanism wherein the CRA was publicly reporting on how it was upholding the Taxpayer Bill of Rights.”
Not only that, but in speaking with “those responsible for setting the policies and procedures to which its employees adhere, it was not immediately apparent that the Taxpayer Bill of Rights was integral in building the foundation of the CRA’s day-to-day business operations.”
The review wasn’t sparked by complaints, but rather was initiated by Ms. Profit.
The CRA, in turn, said Ms. Profit’s office does these types of reviews “routinely,” that it welcomes the probe and will continue working with her group so Canadians get better service.
(Does anyone welcome an audit?)
“The CRA and the OTO share the same goals: To ensure that the best possible service is delivered to taxpayers and that fair, equitable and respectful treatment is provided to all Canadians,” the CRA said in an e-mailed statement.
"The core values of professionalism, respect and integrity are at the heart of the CRA’s service mandate."
The Taxpayer Bill of Rights, adopted more than a decade ago, and which now even comes in poster form, pledges 16 things.
Among them are the right to get what you've got coming, and to pay no more and no less than the law requires.
(And to think I was hoping I had the right to pay less.)
You’re also promised service in either official language, privacy and confidentiality, formal reviews and appeals, courteous and fair treatment and complete, accurate, clear and timely information.
You also don't have to pay a disputed sum until after a review, and you can escape penalties due to extraordinary circumstances.
(I must ask them if a dog on very expensive anxiety medication counts as extraordinary.)
The CRA also promises to warn you about sketchy tax schemes, and allows you to complain without being worried about reprisal.
(Which makes me feel more comfortable about writing this.)
These types of reviews can run between eight and 14 months, given that Ms. Profit’s office has to get certain information from the CRA, which may, in turn, prompt further questions.
Ms. Profit’s general process starts with a service issue being flagged, followed by preliminary research.
"If the CRA tells me it is aware of and addressing the systemic issue, we will monitor the issue for any additional complaints we may receive. Also, we consider all the factors, including the resources available within my office, before we open a systemic examination."
Ms. Profit also sends a memo to the Minister of National Revenue, in this case Diane Lebouthillier. When all is said and done, she’ll give Ms. Lebouthillier her report, with what she has learned and what she recommends.
“If the CRA resolves the issues throughout the process of our examination, my report to the minister will detail the examination we conducted and the steps the CRA took during that examination to resolve the issue.”
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/res...aws.com/public/CTRII22HBFBMFIKZOMF5C2MP74.JPG
https://www.canada.ca/en/taxpayers-ombudsman/services/submit-complaint/submit-complaint.html
这是今天The Globe and Mail 的报道：
The Office of the Taxpayers' Ombudsman is probing whether the Canada Revenue Agency is embracing the commitments of its Taxpayer Bill of Rights.
(You’re allowed a satisfied chuckle here if you’ve ever had a dispute with the CRA.)
Taxpayers' Ombudsman Sherra Profit has announced a “systemic examination” to find out whether the CRA is “effectively integrating the rights and values” of the bill of rights into its operations.
It appears she's not convinced.
"The review began, in part, due to my outreach visits with the CRA regional offices across Canada," Ms Profit said.
"During these discussions, it often appeared many employees were not familiar with the Taxpayer Bill of Rights," she added.
“I also found ... there was no mechanism wherein the CRA was publicly reporting on how it was upholding the Taxpayer Bill of Rights.”
Not only that, but in speaking with “those responsible for setting the policies and procedures to which its employees adhere, it was not immediately apparent that the Taxpayer Bill of Rights was integral in building the foundation of the CRA’s day-to-day business operations.”
The review wasn’t sparked by complaints, but rather was initiated by Ms. Profit.
The CRA, in turn, said Ms. Profit’s office does these types of reviews “routinely,” that it welcomes the probe and will continue working with her group so Canadians get better service.
(Does anyone welcome an audit?)
“The CRA and the OTO share the same goals: To ensure that the best possible service is delivered to taxpayers and that fair, equitable and respectful treatment is provided to all Canadians,” the CRA said in an e-mailed statement.
"The core values of professionalism, respect and integrity are at the heart of the CRA’s service mandate."
The Taxpayer Bill of Rights, adopted more than a decade ago, and which now even comes in poster form, pledges 16 things.
Among them are the right to get what you've got coming, and to pay no more and no less than the law requires.
(And to think I was hoping I had the right to pay less.)
You’re also promised service in either official language, privacy and confidentiality, formal reviews and appeals, courteous and fair treatment and complete, accurate, clear and timely information.
You also don't have to pay a disputed sum until after a review, and you can escape penalties due to extraordinary circumstances.
(I must ask them if a dog on very expensive anxiety medication counts as extraordinary.)
The CRA also promises to warn you about sketchy tax schemes, and allows you to complain without being worried about reprisal.
(Which makes me feel more comfortable about writing this.)
These types of reviews can run between eight and 14 months, given that Ms. Profit’s office has to get certain information from the CRA, which may, in turn, prompt further questions.
Ms. Profit’s general process starts with a service issue being flagged, followed by preliminary research.
"If the CRA tells me it is aware of and addressing the systemic issue, we will monitor the issue for any additional complaints we may receive. Also, we consider all the factors, including the resources available within my office, before we open a systemic examination."
Ms. Profit also sends a memo to the Minister of National Revenue, in this case Diane Lebouthillier. When all is said and done, she’ll give Ms. Lebouthillier her report, with what she has learned and what she recommends.
“If the CRA resolves the issues throughout the process of our examination, my report to the minister will detail the examination we conducted and the steps the CRA took during that examination to resolve the issue.”
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/res...aws.com/public/CTRII22HBFBMFIKZOMF5C2MP74.JPG
注册或登录来发表评论
您必须是注册会员才可以发表评论
注册帐号
注册帐号. 太容易了!
登录
已有帐号? 在这里登录.
