你的这个说法有法律依据吗？
我在网上看到一个案例是当事人未经允许，
也不能录音，否则是违法的。。。。。
这里有篇文章， 他说的都有后边有依据注解，文章比较长， 我只贴一段， 关心的话， 可以打开连接， 看全文
https://langlois.ca/words-fade-away-recordings-remain-admissibility-evidence-audio-video-recordings/
Words Fade Away, but Recordings Remain: the Admissibility into Evidence of Audio and Video Recordings
September 28, 2017
1. Introduction
The extraordinary advances in technology over the last decade have made it increasingly difficult to determine where the right to privacy begins and ends. Through the lens of a cellular phone, the watchful eye of a surveillance camera or the inquisitive ear of a hidden microphone, this fundamental right appears to be increasingly eroded. Today a conversation can be routinely recorded without any particularly sophisticated or cumbersome equipment. In civil law however, many questions remain about the extent to which one’s privacy can be thus invaded.
2. The general principle: admissibility
The search for the truth is the essence of any judicial proceeding: “
Evidence of any fact relevant to a dispute is admissible and may be produced by any means”1. This principle is the basis for the general rule that all relevant evidence should be disclosed2. However, applying that principle fully can adversely impact fundamental human rights, particularly the constitutionally protected right to privacy3. And that is why the rule is subject to several exceptions, including that limiting the admissibility into evidence of recordings in certain circumstances.
