臉書執行長扎克伯格被指控在搖擺州投入巨額資金
- 主题发起人 STILLWELL
- 发布时间 2020-11-10
Zuck大学时就是小偷叛徒了，不然怎么会有FACEBOOK.
就知道有人这么说，所以下面贴给你，慢慢看。
大多数主流媒体背后都是民主党的力量，媒体能主宰舆论的方向，对于不利民主党的消息能不能报道就不报道，能弱化负面就弱化。对自己有利的新闻大力报道。这个和独裁国家没什么区别。
Facebook’s Zuckerberg funding election judges in Pennsylvania: ‘What could go wrong?’
by WorldTribune Staff, November 6, 2020 A federal lawsuit filed on Oct. 19 noted that Facebook billionaire Mark Zuckerberg provided the funds to double the number of polling places in Philadelphia …www.worldtribune.com
by WorldTribune Staff, November 6, 2020
A federal lawsuit filed on Oct. 19 noted that Facebook billionaire Mark Zuckerberg provided the funds to double the number of polling places in Philadelphia and that he is also paying for judges to oversee ballot counting.
Votebook: Turns out that Mark Zuckerberg has a heavy hand it what is transpiring in Philadelphia. / C-SPAN
The suit, filed in U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania, highlights how a grant for $10 million from the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) explicitly requires the City of Philadelphia open no fewer than 800 new polling places – and failing to do so may require the City to forfeit the grant money. The funding from Zuckerberg also pays for judges to oversee ballot counts and the outcome of disputes that arise regarding the eligibility of ballots in the election.
The plaintiffs in the case, the Pennsylvania Voters Alliance and several officeholders and candidates, previously filed a complaint against Centre County, Delaware County, and the City of Philadelphia, and Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Kathy Boockvar.
“Municipal leaders have ceded their role as a local authority to CTCL with powers that rightfully belong to the people of Pennsylvania through their representatives in Harrisburg by effectively inviting this partisan billionaire into the ballot counting room,” said Tom King, the legal counsel representing the plaintiffs in the case.”
Washington Times reporter Rowan Scarborough noted: “They are still voting in Pennsylvania. Three days after Nov. 3. Dems tried that in other states but judges said no. Continued voting after election day would be considered fraud by UN observers. News reports said more ballots coming in. No post mark required. Or matching signature. UN observers would also consider that evidence of fraud.”
Phill Kline, Director of the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society, which is supporting the litigation in Pennsylvania, said: “We are fighting Mark Zuckerberg around the country where he is using CTCL, a nonprofit founded and managed by Obama-affiliated operatives, to funnel hundreds of millions of dollars to leftist strongholds in several battleground states to determine the outcome of the election. This is a scheme engineered by partisan activists under the guise of COVID-related support. The privatization of the election undermines the integrity of the election.”
Political commentator Mark Steyn noted: “So swing-state elections are now a subsidiary of Facebook: Votebook. What could go wrong?”
Steyn noted in a post on The Mark Steyn Club website: “Just a general observation from a foreigner feeling ever more foreign since Wednesday morning: I have spent election night in many countries over the years, and have never seen what I saw on Tuesday night. And I am amazed that even the parochial brain-dead American legacy media could pass off what happened in Philadelphia as normal. Everywhere else the polls close and the riding or constituency counts the votes until they’re all done and they have a final 100 percent result – by 9pm, 11.30pm, 3am, however long it takes. But, in Philadelphia and elsewhere, they suddenly stop counting and everyone goes home until late the following morning to start counting the boxes that have shown up under cover of darkness.”
Steyn went on to note: “But with every couple of hours it’s clear that Fox News called Arizona way too early, and that, if it’s an honest count, the probability is that that state will fall back into the Trump column – which, with Georgia, NC and Penn, would be enough to get him past 270. That’s a very big ‘if’, but it would seem more likely than any beneficial result from state judges, even those not cashing a Zuckerberg check.”
大选期间，主流媒体已经不可信，
宣传他们想要的声音，封杀他们不想要的声音，看了反而会被误导和洗脑
昨天听到郭德纲的2005的一个相声，里面那句话，说的太好了
你看哪些流言，说的比新闻（主流）还真，你看那新闻（主流），一个屁俩个谎
主流媒体的背后力量只想让老百姓看到他们想让老百姓看到的。
大选期间，主流媒体已经不可信，
宣传他们想要的声音，封杀他们不想要的声音，看了反而会被误导和洗脑
昨天听到郭德纲的2005的一个相声，里面那句话，说的太好了
你看哪些流言，说的比新闻（主流）还真，你看那新闻（主流），一个屁俩个谎
这些法轮功媒体的视野很狭隘，以是否反共来决定立场，做法其实和国内的新闻连播没什么区别，可信度很低
是不是因为这个新闻啊？
这次是争议最大的一次。我也觉得是，无非就是想舆论导向。昨晚看见这个：但愿能反转，还川普一个公道。 @gjw8060 别急着交割，大笔的赌注得等到1月20号再清算，让总统再飞一会儿
翻盘的话，我欠你20，我也觉得是，无非就是想舆论导向。昨晚看见这个：但愿能反转，还川普一个公道。 @gjw8060 别急着交割，大笔的赌注得等到1月20号再清算，让总统再飞一会儿
不急，我一直都觉得应该以1月20号为准，只不过我很讨厌欠债的感觉就先给了。所以到现在，水电煤气电话网络这些公司都欠我的钱呢，balance都是负数
我敬佩你的大度，不急，我一直都觉得应该以1月20号为准，只不过我很讨厌欠债的感觉就先给了。所以到现在，水电煤气电话网络这些公司都欠我的钱呢，balance都是负数
我也绝对不是小人，
我偷偷的把赔率提高了，约定之外多给你十元，翻盘的话，
你看哪些流言，说的比新闻（主流）还真，你看那新闻（主流），一个屁俩个谎
大选期间，主流媒体已经不可信，
宣传他们想要的声音，封杀他们不想要的声音，看了反而会被误导和洗脑
昨天听到郭德纲的2005的一个相声，里面那句话，说的太好了
你看哪些流言，说的比新闻（主流）还真，你看那新闻（主流），一个屁俩个谎
-----哈哈 犀利,,
好吧，你设一下指标，
你要学习见好就收呀
这个估计没人敢赌，就算赌了，人家也不认为你说的那些事实就是舞弊
翻盘的可能性不大，不过你确实是大度的，本来大家都是赌着好玩而已，没必要剑拔弩张。
翻盘的话，我欠你2。
哈哈，这么一说，显得你风度比我好，你要学习见好就收呀
这个估计没人敢赌，就算赌了，人家也不认为你说的那些事实就是舞弊
翻盘的可能性不大，不过你确实是大度的，本来大家都是赌着好玩而已，没必要剑拔弩张。
的确，我觉得朋友之间对赌比较好，输赢之后，互相嘲笑一下，不伤感情，
假如产生伤害，就没意思了
注册或登录来发表评论
您必须是注册会员才可以发表评论
注册帐号
注册帐号. 太容易了!
登录
已有帐号? 在这里登录.
