臉書執行長扎克伯格被指控在搖擺州投入巨額資金

美國媒體11月6日披露﹐臉書執行長扎克伯格因被指控在搖擺州投入巨額資金﹐甚至向法官支付「酬勞」,試圖影響選舉結果,10月中被告上賓州法庭。
Facebook’s Zuckerberg funding election judges in Pennsylvania: ‘What could go wrong?
 
最后编辑: 2020-11-10

徽州女人

江南烟雨
美國媒體11月6日披露﹐臉書執行長扎克伯格因被指控在搖擺州投入巨額資金﹐甚至向法官支付「酬勞」,試圖影響選舉結果,10月中被告上賓州法庭。
真不明白为什么科技巨头会如此统一战线。民主党那么多选票都有问题,改过就算都不用追究吗?民主党有没有舞弊,压根就是秃子头上的虱子,明摆着的。太猖狂了
 
真不明白为什么科技巨头会如此统一战线。民主党那么多选票都有问题,改过就算都不用追究吗?民主党有没有舞弊,压根就是秃子头上的虱子,明摆着的。太猖狂了
谁对谁错不重要,
达到自己的目的才是重要的,有钱有权的人更是如此。
 
最后编辑: 2020-11-10
像大纪元,新唐人电视台这类媒体所发出的巨大消息,建议各位多查寻其它媒体有没有同样的报道,比如华盛顿邮报,纽约时报,美国之音,BBC中文网等。
就知道有人这么说,所以下面贴给你,慢慢看。
大多数主流媒体背后都是民主党的力量,媒体能主宰舆论的方向,对于不利民主党的消息能不能报道就不报道,能弱化负面就弱化。对自己有利的新闻大力报道。这个和独裁国家没什么区别。


by WorldTribune Staff, November 6, 2020

A federal lawsuit filed on Oct. 19 noted that Facebook billionaire Mark Zuckerberg provided the funds to double the number of polling places in Philadelphia and that he is also paying for judges to oversee ballot counting.

Votebook: Turns out that Mark Zuckerberg has a heavy hand it what is transpiring in Philadelphia. / C-SPAN
The suit, filed in U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania, highlights how a grant for $10 million from the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) explicitly requires the City of Philadelphia open no fewer than 800 new polling places – and failing to do so may require the City to forfeit the grant money. The funding from Zuckerberg also pays for judges to oversee ballot counts and the outcome of disputes that arise regarding the eligibility of ballots in the election.

The plaintiffs in the case, the Pennsylvania Voters Alliance and several officeholders and candidates, previously filed a complaint against Centre County, Delaware County, and the City of Philadelphia, and Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Kathy Boockvar.

“Municipal leaders have ceded their role as a local authority to CTCL with powers that rightfully belong to the people of Pennsylvania through their representatives in Harrisburg by effectively inviting this partisan billionaire into the ballot counting room,” said Tom King, the legal counsel representing the plaintiffs in the case.”

Washington Times reporter Rowan Scarborough noted: “They are still voting in Pennsylvania. Three days after Nov. 3. Dems tried that in other states but judges said no. Continued voting after election day would be considered fraud by UN observers. News reports said more ballots coming in. No post mark required. Or matching signature. UN observers would also consider that evidence of fraud.”

Phill Kline, Director of the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society, which is supporting the litigation in Pennsylvania, said: “We are fighting Mark Zuckerberg around the country where he is using CTCL, a nonprofit founded and managed by Obama-affiliated operatives, to funnel hundreds of millions of dollars to leftist strongholds in several battleground states to determine the outcome of the election. This is a scheme engineered by partisan activists under the guise of COVID-related support. The privatization of the election undermines the integrity of the election.”

Political commentator Mark Steyn noted: “So swing-state elections are now a subsidiary of Facebook: Votebook. What could go wrong?”

Steyn noted in a post on The Mark Steyn Club website: “Just a general observation from a foreigner feeling ever more foreign since Wednesday morning: I have spent election night in many countries over the years, and have never seen what I saw on Tuesday night. And I am amazed that even the parochial brain-dead American legacy media could pass off what happened in Philadelphia as normal. Everywhere else the polls close and the riding or constituency counts the votes until they’re all done and they have a final 100 percent result – by 9pm, 11.30pm, 3am, however long it takes. But, in Philadelphia and elsewhere, they suddenly stop counting and everyone goes home until late the following morning to start counting the boxes that have shown up under cover of darkness.”

Steyn went on to note: “But with every couple of hours it’s clear that Fox News called Arizona way too early, and that, if it’s an honest count, the probability is that that state will fall back into the Trump column – which, with Georgia, NC and Penn, would be enough to get him past 270. That’s a very big ‘if’, but it would seem more likely than any beneficial result from state judges, even those not cashing a Zuckerberg check.”
 
最后编辑: 2020-11-10
就知道有人这么说,所以下面贴给你,慢慢看。
大多数主流媒体背后都是民主党的力量,媒体能主宰舆论的方向,对于不利民主党的消息能不能报道就不报道,能弱化负面就弱化。对自己有利的新闻大力报道。这个和独裁国家没什么区别。


by WorldTribune Staff, November 6, 2020

A federal lawsuit filed on Oct. 19 noted that Facebook billionaire Mark Zuckerberg provided the funds to double the number of polling places in Philadelphia and that he is also paying for judges to oversee ballot counting.

Votebook: Turns out that Mark Zuckerberg has a heavy hand it what is transpiring in Philadelphia. / C-SPAN
The suit, filed in U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania, highlights how a grant for $10 million from the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) explicitly requires the City of Philadelphia open no fewer than 800 new polling places – and failing to do so may require the City to forfeit the grant money. The funding from Zuckerberg also pays for judges to oversee ballot counts and the outcome of disputes that arise regarding the eligibility of ballots in the election.

The plaintiffs in the case, the Pennsylvania Voters Alliance and several officeholders and candidates, previously filed a complaint against Centre County, Delaware County, and the City of Philadelphia, and Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Kathy Boockvar.

“Municipal leaders have ceded their role as a local authority to CTCL with powers that rightfully belong to the people of Pennsylvania through their representatives in Harrisburg by effectively inviting this partisan billionaire into the ballot counting room,” said Tom King, the legal counsel representing the plaintiffs in the case.”

Washington Times reporter Rowan Scarborough noted: “They are still voting in Pennsylvania. Three days after Nov. 3. Dems tried that in other states but judges said no. Continued voting after election day would be considered fraud by UN observers. News reports said more ballots coming in. No post mark required. Or matching signature. UN observers would also consider that evidence of fraud.”

Phill Kline, Director of the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society, which is supporting the litigation in Pennsylvania, said: “We are fighting Mark Zuckerberg around the country where he is using CTCL, a nonprofit founded and managed by Obama-affiliated operatives, to funnel hundreds of millions of dollars to leftist strongholds in several battleground states to determine the outcome of the election. This is a scheme engineered by partisan activists under the guise of COVID-related support. The privatization of the election undermines the integrity of the election.”

Political commentator Mark Steyn noted: “So swing-state elections are now a subsidiary of Facebook: Votebook. What could go wrong?”

Steyn noted in a post on The Mark Steyn Club website: “Just a general observation from a foreigner feeling ever more foreign since Wednesday morning: I have spent election night in many countries over the years, and have never seen what I saw on Tuesday night. And I am amazed that even the parochial brain-dead American legacy media could pass off what happened in Philadelphia as normal. Everywhere else the polls close and the riding or constituency counts the votes until they’re all done and they have a final 100 percent result – by 9pm, 11.30pm, 3am, however long it takes. But, in Philadelphia and elsewhere, they suddenly stop counting and everyone goes home until late the following morning to start counting the boxes that have shown up under cover of darkness.”

Steyn went on to note: “But with every couple of hours it’s clear that Fox News called Arizona way too early, and that, if it’s an honest count, the probability is that that state will fall back into the Trump column – which, with Georgia, NC and Penn, would be enough to get him past 270. That’s a very big ‘if’, but it would seem more likely than any beneficial result from state judges, even those not cashing a Zuckerberg check.”
现在媒体好厉害,谁当总统它说了算。
 
借用阿吾的图。
谁输谁赢不重要,
重要的民主选举是不是真的民主,谁动用权力背后舞弊。
如果连总统都没有地方说理的话,民主法制社会也是徒有虚名。
希望摇摆州的复查尽快有结果,找到背后操作指示的人,法办。
现在挺真正民主的都被打成川粉了,小人扣帽子绝不含糊。
 
还贿赂法官 知道这在美国是什么性质吗?他敢发署名文章吗? 敢实名发表 等着吃官司的是他们。 不入流的右翼极端网站
Zuck会不会判是另一回事 Zuck有问题是绝对的 我早听说了
不用要求人家一定要署名 CNN NYT以保护隐私的理由说不知道编造了多少东西了
前两天不刚编造了剧川普白宫身边的人透漏老婆要离婚 女婿劝他投降?
很多事情慢慢等慢慢看 不用给他们站台 除非你买了他们的股票 ?
 
最后编辑: 2020-11-10
还贿赂法官 知道这在美国是什么性质吗?他敢发署名文章吗? 敢实名发表 等着吃官司的是他们。 不入流的右翼极端网站
人家媒体也要保护员工的生命安全的。
扎克伯格可以告WorldTribune代替告员工,他有不是没钱告。等着看他告WorldTribune。

请问选举舞弊,操作大选,改写选票,增加本来没有的选票是什么性质?
 
最后编辑: 2020-11-10

注册或登录来发表评论

您必须是注册会员才可以发表评论

注册帐号

注册帐号. 太容易了!

登录

已有帐号? 在这里登录.

顶部