第七集 :胜利号角。 12/03 乔治亚州公听会

最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
我今天听了江峰与方伟的视频,不错,
方伟解释了一下几种方式的不同

第一个是国家紧急状态,川普早就宣布了,这个赋予总统136个特权
第二个是戒严令,反叛乱法,当宪法受到挑战,总统的权力受法律的限制
第三个是军管,总统权力不受限,没有法律限制
希望川普先礼后兵,一步步拯救美国,不惜一切手段。
 

阿吾

踏实做事 有趣做人
最大赞力
0.06
当前赞力
100.00%
密西根的公听会,昨天6个小时证人作证
今天还有第二场,6:00 pm ET ,
证人太多了,每个证人只给3分钟,

明天好像内华达州的公听会,看来每个摇摆州,都要来一次。。。

这么多天,这么多州的公听会,
那些口口声声要证据的家园反川者,听了吗,老萨躲到哪里去了。。。 :ROFLMAO:

直播:密西根的第二场公听会
 

阿吾

踏实做事 有趣做人
最大赞力
0.06
当前赞力
100.00%
希望川普先礼后兵,一步步拯救美国,不惜一切手段。

保护宪法,确保选举公平。。

1 As the President of the United States, I have no higher duty than to protect our constitution. So I have determined to protect our election system.
2 We must ensure every legal ballot is counted, and no illegal ballot is counted.
3 Without a fair election, we don't have a country.
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
有点意思,一边推特治国,一边讨伐推特。
川普的独特逻辑。
你的意思是我们使用枪但不能出台管理枪的规则?

你对230条款的理解是错误的。

我同意当前科技公司拥有所有权力,却无任何责任的做法是有问题的。 特别是当前大型科技公司拥有如此大的经济利益情况下。

如果真的废除230条款,会对美国科技公司(网站/app)有“无穷无尽“的诉讼 。

如果230条款真被废除,实践中,twitter和facebook等,一上来就会封禁到所有有争议言论的账户 ,结果会和中国的网站管制趋同。

废除230条款,这对极右和极左都是一个”灾难“ 。川普如果下台,不再做总统,如果废除230条款,川普的twitter账号首当其冲会被封杀。
同意管理员的观点,当年给科技公司230条款就是为了使他们更快的发展,现在应该出台相应的制约条款而不是完全废除,这同样是为了他们更好的发展,否则继续发展下去,这些公司为了自身利益,将来可以决定人民可以看什么不可以看什么,和中共的网络审查一样
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
保护宪法,确保选举公平。。

1 As the President of the United States, I have no higher duty than to protect our constitution. So I have determined to protect our election system.
2 We must ensure every legal ballot is counted, and no illegal ballot is counted.
3 Without a fair election, we don't have a country.
说的太好了。总统万岁!
 

gjw8060

President-Elect
最大赞力
0.14
当前赞力
100.00%
有人约着下注;
哈哈哈
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
惊爆!中国几个月前买下了多猫腻公司!川普总统有可能宣布戒严!这不是舞弊,是叛国。一旦做实中共操控选举,那就是对外战争和对内的叛国罪清剿行动。先礼后兵,现在礼的环节:把道理说开了,再公布证据,下一步就是清剿叛国者,对中共宣战。
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
有人约着下注;
哈哈哈
摩托哥和白白同学又不声不响地去下注了 :ROFLMAO:
节制节制!小赌怡情,大赌......
 

阿吾

踏实做事 有趣做人
最大赞力
0.06
当前赞力
100.00%
违宪是关键字。。。
=================
川普总统在威斯康星州提起诉讼,指控非法和违宪行为

Today President Donald J. Trump filed a lawsuit against the Wisconsin Elections Commission, et. al. in his personal capacity as a candidate for re-election to the office of President of the United States. The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Division.

The complaint is based on the unlawful and unconstitutional acts by Wisconsin public officials, including the Wisconsin Elections Commission, the Mayors of Milwaukee, Madison, Kenosha, Green Bay, and Racine, and other election officials.

The suit seeks relief under the Electors Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which requires that public officials follow State Election Law when conducting a presidential election in their state. The lawsuits asks the U.S. District Court to find constitutional violations by defendants and send the matter to the Wisconsin Legislature for appropriate relief under Article II, Section 1.2. The U.S. Constitution makes the state legislature the final decision-makers on how to address constitutional violations involving a presidential election, and textually grants them the authority to select delegates to the Electoral College.

Specifically, the lawsuit alleges the following key unlawful acts:

  • Directives by the Wisconsin Elections Commission undercutting Wisconsin’s Photo Identification Law.
  • A Plan by the Mayors of Wisconsin’s five largest cities (Milwaukee, Madison, Kenosha, Green Bay and Racine) and funded by an out-of-state organization known as the Center for Tech & Civic Life to implement a new form of balloting in Wisconsin using un-manned, absentee ballot drop boxes without adequate or uniform chain of custody standards and security protocols contrary to the Wisconsin Election Code.
  • Directives by the Wisconsin Elections Commission that facilitated the unlawful, un-manned absentee ballot drop box Plan by endorsing illegal drop boxes (which were then ultimately used throughout the State in the election), failing to adopt uniform chain of custody and security protocols for the ballots in the drop boxes and failing to ensure public access to the process.
  • Directives by the Wisconsin Elections Commission to election officials to tamper with witness certifications on absentee ballot envelopes which facilitated the counting of unlawful ballots in the election in violation of the Wisconsin Election Code.
“The United States Constitution prevents the rules in a Presidential Election from being changed at the last minute by un-elected bureaucrats and local politicians who may have a more narrow interest in the outcome of the election. We have alleged in our Complaint on behalf of the President that the Wisconsin Elections Commission and other state and local officials in Wisconsin broke the Wisconsin Election Code and ran an unconstitutional and unlawful election. Nothing is more important to our national fabric and future than integrity in our electoral process. This lawsuit is one-step in the direction of fairer, more transparent, more professional and ultimately more reliable elections in America.” Bill Bock, lead counsel in the Wisconsin federal suit for Donald J. Trump.

“Today’s federal lawsuit in Wisconsin reveals an apparently coordinated effort to push a new form of balloting upon Wisconsin voters that was not protected by uniform chain of custody and security standards and protocols. Regrettably, this is the same sort of conduct we have seen across many battleground states that Democrats knew they had to win to defeat the President where the rules of the election were changed at the last minute and guardrails against fraud were simultaneously lowered.

We hope that the State Legislatures in every affected State will take up this battle to protect the voters in their State. This is a solemn responsibility the Constitution entrusts directly to State Legislatures. The time for full scale investigations and resolve to uphold the Constitution is now, and President Trump is committed to fighting corruption and ensuring free and fair elections today and into the future for every American.” Jenna Ellis, Senior Legal Adviser for Trump 2020 Campaign and Attorney to President Trump.

Click here to read the filing.
 

Similar threads

家园推荐黄页

家园币系统数据

家园币池子报价
家园币最新成交价
家园币总发行量
加元现金总量
家园币总成交量
家园币总成交价值

池子家园币总量
池子加元现金总量
池子币总量
1池子币现价
池子家园币总手续费
池子加元总手续费
入池家园币年化收益率
入池加元年化收益率

微比特币最新报价
毫以太币最新报价
微比特币总量
毫以太币总量
家园币储备总净值
家园币比特币储备
家园币以太币储备
比特币的加元报价
以太币的加元报价
USDT的加元报价

交易币种/月度交易量
家园币
加元交易对(比特币等)
USDT交易对(比特币等)
顶部