想写一个不得不写的故事.

[游客]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

请拿出证据来.不然的话,我也能告你诽谤.

你，哈哈，先去查差诽谤的定义吧。
俺就等着看你怎么把俺的房产变没了。

 

[游客]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

又开始了。。。。。

熊你就缓缓吧， 就像是楼上说的 ，翻译费用可不少钱 。
那个人就是热心的傻大姐，自己得罪人都不知道。她现在可不想跟你上法庭，你再继续说，也是让我们这群人看热闹。你也不会更顺心。

出去走走吧，大统华特价西班牙饭，两盒才1.99 。 买个10个做储备。

如果真傻，还真能逃避法律制裁呢。那俺就算输了也高兴。

 

[小猪哼哼]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

这两人真是的,就算一个没卖房子,一个没考驾照,上来自己想象着美一下,有什么关系呢?又不损害什么人的真实利益...弄成这样,何必呢?

 

[布什他哥]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

找有资质的翻译公司翻译，法庭认可证据。

不用担心这个。法院会指定翻译帮你处理的。支持你去告。What is Defamation? The Rise of Internet Libel Cases in CanadaFriday’s Ottawa Citizen carried a story on the rise of libel cases in Canada, due to the rising popularity of blogging. No doubt bloggers are increasingly being attacked for perceived defamation. So what is defamation? That’s a tricky question, made doubly difficult by the fact that it is treated differently in US courts than in Canada. I am not a lawyer, however, I found the following resources helpful:The Wikipedia entry on Defamation is quite complete, defining what constitutes defamatory speech, and differentiating between libel and slander. It also includes a history of defamation law, and outlines the differences in practice between several nations, including the US, Canada, and the UK. EFF.org’s online FAQ on defamation law is also a good resource. It’s completely US-centric, but does a good job of outlining current case law, and the boundaries that govern free speech.Vancouver-based McConchie Law has an extensive website dealing with defamation, privacy and other topics, including case review, in a Canadian context. If you post anything controversial, it’s likely you will, at some point, be harrassed. You can save yourself some headaches by knowing in advance where the boundaries of free speech exist.The Citizen piece also includes this quote:McConchie says most Internet libel cases in which damages are awarded are those in which the person responsible for the offensive material refuses to remove it once they are warned that it may be defamatory. Even if they get into legal trouble over a blog entry or discussion board posting, most amateur Internet authors can avoid a full-blown court case with some common sense and willingness to compromise, he says. It would take an extreme threat for me to remove a posting, or for that matter, a comment to a posting. This soapbox of mine is intended to provoke discussion. If you don’t like what I’ve written, well, that’s what the comment boxes are for. That way, both viewpoints can be viewed and/or discussed by visitors.

 

[游客]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

这两人真是的,就算一个没卖房子,一个没考驾照,上来自己想象着美一下,有什么关系呢?又不损害什么人的真实利益...弄成这样,何必呢?

有人吃爆了撑的呗。
俺家吃个葱油饼水饺，都能让它捣鼓俩三年，不理它都不行，这不是BT啥是BT?

 

[小猪哼哼]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

我就喜欢吃葱油饼,可惜不会做,有空跟你学学,呵呵.

 

[冬日漂流瓶]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

我就喜欢吃葱油饼,可惜不会做,有空跟你学学,呵呵.

我也是喜欢吃,也教教我

 

[lcegas]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

不用担心这个。法院会指定翻译帮你处理的。支持你去告。What is Defamation? The Rise of Internet Libel Cases in CanadaFriday’s Ottawa Citizen carried a story on the rise of libel cases in Canada, due to the rising popularity of blogging. No doubt bloggers are increasingly being attacked for perceived defamation. So what is defamation? That’s a tricky question, made doubly difficult by the fact that it is treated differently in US courts than in Canada. I am not a lawyer, however, I found the following resources helpful:The Wikipedia entry on Defamation is quite complete, defining what constitutes defamatory speech, and differentiating between libel and slander. It also includes a history of defamation law, and outlines the differences in practice between several nations, including the US, Canada, and the UK. EFF.org’s online FAQ on defamation law is also a good resource. It’s completely US-centric, but does a good job of outlining current case law, and the boundaries that govern free speech.Vancouver-based McConchie Law has an extensive website dealing with defamation, privacy and other topics, including case review, in a Canadian context. If you post anything controversial, it’s likely you will, at some point, be harrassed. You can save yourself some headaches by knowing in advance where the boundaries of free speech exist.The Citizen piece also includes this quote:McConchie says most Internet libel cases in which damages are awarded are those in which the person responsible for the offensive material refuses to remove it once they are warned that it may be defamatory. Even if they get into legal trouble over a blog entry or discussion board posting, most amateur Internet authors can avoid a full-blown court case with some common sense and willingness to compromise, he says. It would take an extreme threat for me to remove a posting, or for that matter, a comment to a posting. This soapbox of mine is intended to provoke discussion. If you don’t like what I’ve written, well, that’s what the comment boxes are for. That way, both viewpoints can be viewed and/or discussed by visitors.

wow,BJ也来了

 

[游客]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

自己告，他们可以帮助翻译？俺知道出庭时有免费口语翻译的。

不用担心这个。法院会指定翻译帮你处理的。支持你去告。What is Defamation? The Rise of Internet Libel Cases in CanadaFriday’s Ottawa Citizen carried a story on the rise of libel cases in Canada, due to the rising popularity of blogging. No doubt bloggers are increasingly being attacked for perceived defamation. So what is defamation? That’s a tricky question, made doubly difficult by the fact that it is treated differently in US courts than in Canada. I am not a lawyer, however, I found the following resources helpful:The Wikipedia entry on Defamation is quite complete, defining what constitutes defamatory speech, and differentiating between libel and slander. It also includes a history of defamation law, and outlines the differences in practice between several nations, including the US, Canada, and the UK. EFF.org’s online FAQ on defamation law is also a good resource. It’s completely US-centric, but does a good job of outlining current case law, and the boundaries that govern free speech.Vancouver-based McConchie Law has an extensive website dealing with defamation, privacy and other topics, including case review, in a Canadian context. If you post anything controversial, it’s likely you will, at some point, be harrassed. You can save yourself some headaches by knowing in advance where the boundaries of free speech exist.The Citizen piece also includes this quote:McConchie says most Internet libel cases in which damages are awarded are those in which the person responsible for the offensive material refuses to remove it once they are warned that it may be defamatory. Even if they get into legal trouble over a blog entry or discussion board posting, most amateur Internet authors can avoid a full-blown court case with some common sense and willingness to compromise, he says. It would take an extreme threat for me to remove a posting, or for that matter, a comment to a posting. This soapbox of mine is intended to provoke discussion. If you don’t like what I’ve written, well, that’s what the comment boxes are for. That way, both viewpoints can be viewed and/or discussed by visitors.

 

[小猪哼哼]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

我也是喜欢吃,也教教我

就是啊,你看咱们没事讨论讨论葱油饼啊什么的,多好,既对身体好,也对心情好

 

[syj2959]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

都歇歇吧！
还有闲心这么吵！
日子过得肯定是好！

 

[游客]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

就是啊,你看咱们没事讨论讨论葱油饼啊什么的,多好,既对身体好,也对心情好

呵呵，回头让人追着骂你家穷的只能吃葱油饼的时候，心情才好呢。
一块大饼，都能逼傻一个人。

 

[Milly]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

在这里吵吵骂骂就完了,尽情发挥,互相损损,出出气得了.干嘛要对簿公堂?有什么过节,大家给解开.再说就算受点委屈也没什么大不了的.非要法官说谁有理就有理了?大家的心里多少也有点数.小事小非小我值得这么较真么.
不想以后在家园里再也见不到吐舌头的小狗,或者冰熊.就在这里吵完得了.

 

[布什他哥]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

退一步海阔天空。
most amateur Internet authors can avoid a full-blown court case with some common sense and willingness to compromise。

 

[小猪哼哼]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

我家穷的只吃葱油饼,关他(?)什么事啊?
我有钱,也不会分给别人,我没钱,也不会有人白给我,大家各过各的日子,唉....不明白啊

 

[游客]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

在这里吵吵骂骂就完了,尽情发挥,互相损损,出出气得了.干嘛要对簿公堂?有什么过节,大家给解开.再说就算受点委屈也没什么大不了的.非要法官说谁有理就有理了?大家的心里多少也有点数.小事小非小我值得这么较真么.
不想以后在家园里再也见不到吐舌头的小狗,或者冰熊.就在这里吵完得了.

俺还等着它告俺呢。这多好，俺告它它告俺，俩个案子，拉动经济。

 

[冬日漂流瓶]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

说白了就是心态问题，气人有，笑人无。比来比去，心理不平衡所致。
某些人还说过，不比生活就没奔头了。

 

[happy2004lili]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

都是比谁有钱惹的祸.....
有钱人喜欢吃葱油饼的,多了去了...

 

[游客]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

我家穷的只吃葱油饼,关他(?)什么事啊?
我有钱,也不会分给别人,我没钱,也不会有人白给我,大家各过各的日子,唉....不明白啊

MM，你切得想不明白几年呢，俺都想了三年了，就俺这大脑壳，都没想明白。

这葱油饼吧，至少还得有油水吧，不比那吃盘土豆丝就想改良后代的人强啊。

 

[admin]

回复: 想写一个不得不写的故事.

不用担心这个。法院会指定翻译帮你处理的。支持你去告。What is Defamation? The Rise of Internet Libel Cases in CanadaFriday’s Ottawa Citizen carried a story on the rise of libel cases in Canada, due to the rising popularity of blogging. No doubt bloggers are increasingly being attacked for perceived defamation. So what is defamation? That’s a tricky question, made doubly difficult by the fact that it is treated differently in US courts than in Canada. I am not a lawyer, however, I found the following resources helpful:The Wikipedia entry on Defamation is quite complete, defining what constitutes defamatory speech, and differentiating between libel and slander. It also includes a history of defamation law, and outlines the differences in practice between several nations, including the US, Canada, and the UK. EFF.org’s online FAQ on defamation law is also a good resource. It’s completely US-centric, but does a good job of outlining current case law, and the boundaries that govern free speech.Vancouver-based McConchie Law has an extensive website dealing with defamation, privacy and other topics, including case review, in a Canadian context. If you post anything controversial, it’s likely you will, at some point, be harrassed. You can save yourself some headaches by knowing in advance where the boundaries of free speech exist.The Citizen piece also includes this quote:McConchie says most Internet libel cases in which damages are awarded are those in which the person responsible for the offensive material refuses to remove it once they are warned that it may be defamatory. Even if they get into legal trouble over a blog entry or discussion board posting, most amateur Internet authors can avoid a full-blown court case with some common sense and willingness to compromise, he says. It would take an extreme threat for me to remove a posting, or for that matter, a comment to a posting. This soapbox of mine is intended to provoke discussion. If you don’t like what I’ve written, well, that’s what the comment boxes are for. That way, both viewpoints can be viewed and/or discussed by visitors.

你的意思是, 俺把你的ID， snowbear888的ID, 牛忙的ID；

全部删除成游客，甚至包括所有帖子，

家园网就没有被告 Defamation 的风险了，

是吗？