回复: 混在加国（生意篇）
肯定不对， 一旦放之四海， 就没有皆准的，
你的问题角度不对， 不能问那种模式， 那种都有挣钱的， 都有赔钱的， 好挣钱的未必适合你，
厚德载物是否放之四海而皆准？
肯定不对， 一旦放之四海， 就没有皆准的，
你的问题角度不对， 不能问那种模式， 那种都有挣钱的， 都有赔钱的， 好挣钱的未必适合你，
- 主题发起人 天涯
- 发布时间 2009-12-27
- 最大赞力
- 0.00
- 当前赞力
- 100.00%
回复: 混在加国（生意篇）
就餐馆来说，一般也不是采用单一的模式，常规经营会融入情感的东西，还会融进品德的内容，特殊的经营模式同样也可能混合进某种情感或品德的内容。在西方社会，个人认为诚信是最重要的。什么都可以失去，但不能把诚信失去。
同一类生意，不同的人有不同的经营理念和模式，不同类的生意同一个人去经营也会融合进个人的经营理念和思维。不同的人用同样的理念去经营，结果可能会不一样。这里说得有点象绕口令，反正涉及人、生意和理念或者说模式，会产生不同排列组合的结果。
就餐馆来说，一般也不是采用单一的模式，常规经营会融入情感的东西，还会融进品德的内容，特殊的经营模式同样也可能混合进某种情感或品德的内容。在西方社会，个人认为诚信是最重要的。什么都可以失去，但不能把诚信失去。
楼主有时间能提供一些加国的生活习惯和爱好吗，谢谢，天天看此贴
回复: 混在加国（生意篇）
Measuring Good-Cause Effects
People pay more for products from worthy vendors. How much more?
http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2009/1228/opinions-ebay-giving-works-on-my-mind.html
你有工夫看看
我刚在forbes看到一篇文章
Measuring Good-Cause Effects
People pay more for products from worthy vendors. How much more?
http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2009/1228/opinions-ebay-giving-works-on-my-mind.html
你有工夫看看
回复: 混在加国（生意篇）
In considering the implications for corporate philanthropy beyond Ebay, you should note that many giving programs aim to bolster companies' reputations over the very long run. Our analysis won't capture this sort of brand investment.
We hope that our study pushes other companies to analyze the impact of their giving programs. This certainly isn't to suggest that programs that don't add to the bottom line should be dropped by corporate America. But it's best to be honest about whether you're doing well by doing good or simply doing good for its own sake.
文章第一段，有一句，没有免费的午餐，这是个不争的事实
文章的内容里Most purchases--and those via online vendors in particular--require some level of trust that the goods (and their delivery) will be as advertised. If a charity tie-in indicates an honest broker, it may be a more useful signal for less prolific sellers than for experienced ones, whose history of positive feedback serves as a credible sign of dependability这是我的想法的一种
大侠推荐的文章对我帮助不小，呵呵，受教了，经营是一个仁者见仁，智者见智的过程，我提的问题，楼主给的答案我很满意
，好文章还希望继续推荐
谢谢，看过了，不过我英语不好，不能详细的领会文章的内容
In considering the implications for corporate philanthropy beyond Ebay, you should note that many giving programs aim to bolster companies' reputations over the very long run. Our analysis won't capture this sort of brand investment.
We hope that our study pushes other companies to analyze the impact of their giving programs. This certainly isn't to suggest that programs that don't add to the bottom line should be dropped by corporate America. But it's best to be honest about whether you're doing well by doing good or simply doing good for its own sake.
文章第一段，有一句，没有免费的午餐，这是个不争的事实
文章的内容里Most purchases--and those via online vendors in particular--require some level of trust that the goods (and their delivery) will be as advertised. If a charity tie-in indicates an honest broker, it may be a more useful signal for less prolific sellers than for experienced ones, whose history of positive feedback serves as a credible sign of dependability这是我的想法的一种
大侠推荐的文章对我帮助不小，呵呵，受教了，经营是一个仁者见仁，智者见智的过程，我提的问题，楼主给的答案我很满意
，好文章还希望继续推荐
