13北京91等ME，1，100全球91看本周末下周初法庭决定。。

[willis]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没

支持~

 

[pop2010]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没

香港目前15人，北京截至12月22日共13人，

按比率，北京已经领先了

 

[ruth0924]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没

按比率，北京已经领先了

香港的同学重灾区了四年，今年，应该说12年，才算有盼头了，所以不急着打官司。而且他们旧证一直有进展，不怕他们走不掉。


我们前面太乐观了，结果一悲观就悲观到底，不给希望似的。

 

[swjtu]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没

北京起诉的情况，收到Tim的email.

Your court case has been launched and your file number is IMM-xxxx-11. I should be able to send you a copy of the actual notice the second week of January, but at this point, I have only the file number.



The Federal Court website allows one to access the status of court cases, which may be accessed either by the file number (IMM-xxxx-11) or the surname (xxx). Thus, if you wish to follow what occurs in your case, you may do so.

 

[popiston]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没

北京起诉的情况，收到Tim的email.

Your court case has been launched and your file number is IMM-xxxx-11. I should be able to send you a copy of the actual notice the second week of January, but at this point, I have only the file number.



The Federal Court website allows one to access the status of court cases, which may be accessed either by the file number (IMM-xxxx-11) or the surname (xxx). Thus, if you wish to follow what occurs in your case, you may do so.

我也收到了。那个号码是顺序编号，我上下找了找，有中国的，有貌似中东的。

 

[ClearYo]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没

关注，忙得一个多月没来都不知道

 

[hellangels]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没

努力努力

 

[民工加拿大]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没

 

[willis]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没

顶pop，12月28日同收到notice-of-application 邮件

 

[加拿大我来了]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没

今天收到ＴＩＭ来信：
DEAＲ＊＊＊
The people handling the cases at the Court were away last week. I expect to file your case today, which will mean that in about two days, I should have your file number. You are the last person in the group to join the litigation, and I had filed their cases before Christmas.
我是最后一个加入起诉的．

 

[ruth0924]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没

今天收到ＴＩＭ来信：
DEAＲ＊＊＊
The people handling the cases at the Court were away last week. I expect to file your case today, which will mean that in about two days, I should have your file number. You are the last person in the group to join the litigation, and I had filed their cases before Christmas.
我是最后一个加入起诉的．

最近没问，应该超15人了吧。还有，你的问题他怎么回？

 

[星星点点]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没

[FONT=garamond, serif]参加起诉的同学应该都收到律师这个最新的更新吧。好像法院要做出判决的话，要到12年年底，还没仔细看，先贴上来。[/FONT]
[FONT=garamond, serif]As the New Year has dawned, I should give you an update on the mandamus litigation. The news is mixed (but not negative).[/FONT]
[FONT=garamond, serif][/FONT]
[FONT=garamond, serif]Our litigation is delayed because opposing counsel, Stephen Gold, will be away on holiday for the last two weeks of January. I had asked the Court to arrange an organizational meeting in January because Mr. Gold had disagreed with my statement that we had agreed to have representative cases from each visa post for each of the two classes of litigants but averred that he was willing to discuss the issue. Hopefully we will meet in early February.[/FONT]
[FONT=garamond, serif][/FONT]
[FONT=garamond, serif]Once the methodology has been settled, I would expect our written arguments to be due thirty days later; i.e., in March; which would mean that written arguments would not be completed until May, after which the Court would decide whether the cases may be argued and, if so, will give a hearing date ninety days after releasing that decision; i.e., no earlier than August but more likely September or October. Thus, unless CIC decides to settle somewhere along the line, the Court's decision is unlikely to be released until the end of the year.[/FONT]
[FONT=garamond, serif][/FONT]
[FONT=garamond, serif]The good news, however, is that yesterday a senior Registry Officer in Ottawa mentioned that the staff had seen a website (but she could not remember which) giving statistics on FSW applications and they could not figure out how CIC will ever be able to get to the older cases if it continues to assess new cases first. While the fact that the staff recognizes the merits of our case does not mean that a judge will as well, it is good news that the Court's personnel have grasped the impact of CIC's queue-jumping processing policy and find it unfathomable and perplexing.[/FONT]
[FONT=garamond, serif][/FONT]
[FONT=garamond, serif]A request for CIC's "inventory" as of December 31st and the targets per category per visa post has been made. Last year, CIC responded to such an access request on January 28th. So, hopefully I will have a copy before the next organizational meeting.[/FONT]
[FONT=garamond, serif][/FONT]
[FONT=garamond, serif]At this point we have 562 litigants, 487 of whose files were lodged in Damascus (176) or New Delhi (311). (In addition, a lawyer in Montreal has filed 100 cases for applicants with files in Damascus.) Thus, inclusion of litigants with files being warehoused in other visa posts will broaden our base and enhance our arguments while additional Delhi and Damascus files will not. However, the numbers have certainly drawn the Court's attention and if the numbers continue to increase, CIC might decide that it would be better to settle than to be buried in litigants.[/FONT]
[FONT=garamond, serif][/FONT]
[FONT=garamond, serif]I do not anticipate sending out another update until we have the next organizational meeting in February. Updates will, of course, be posted on the website, unfairCIC.com.[/FONT]
[FONT=garamond, serif][/FONT]
[FONT=garamond, serif]Best wishes for the New Year,[/FONT]
[FONT=garamond, serif][/FONT]
[FONT=garamond, serif]Tim [/FONT]​

 

[walterliu]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没

我也收到了，说实话，没想到会被押后这么久，有点失望

 

[加拿大我来了]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没

最近没问，应该超15人了吧。还有，你的问题他怎么回？

我的问题TIM没有回.后来我给赵律师打了电话,赵说TIM是希望2013年结案,并给出结案的具体日期,只是不能百分之百确定会这样判下来.TIM会尽量争取.其余的没说啥.

 

[阿达就是我]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没

这才1月份，现在就支到年底。这个国家真的让人发指

 

[ruth0924]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没

e methodology has been settled, I would expect our written arguments to be due thirty days later; i.e., in March; which would mean that written arguments would not be completed until May, after which the Court would decide whether the cases may be argued and, if so, will give a hearing date ninety days after releasing that decision; i.e., no earlier than August but more likely September or October. Thus, unless CIC decides to settle somewhere along the line, the Court's decision is unlikely to be released until the end of the year.



怎么做这个argument需要2月、3月、4月、5月四个月？？？大家有疑问或不满意给律师发信吧，这准备工作太长的不像话了。毕竟就后面的听证才是主要的，时间也是死的。

 

[ruth0924]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没

对我请他请人手并且加快备案的问题，律师做了第一时间回复。大意是他准备到递交要一个月，对方回复需要一个月，中间回应又需10天，到了法官那里还需2周。算算三月就进去了。


Dear Ruth,


I have thirty days to submit my arguments; DoJ has thirty days to respond, after which I have ten days to reply. DoJ almost always takes the full thirty days. After the file is complete, it ordinarily takes two weeks before the file is in front off a judge. As the next organizational meeting will not occur until February, and until it occurs, I do not have instruction on how to proceed, our thirty days will not begin until that meeting has occurred.


Finally, trust me, no one would agree to prepare the written arguments, serve and file them for $300. So, you really should not be expecting me either to pay others out of my own pocket or for them to work virtually for free. (The court filing fee is $50.)


Regards,


Tim

 

[Redred]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没

现在还可以加入起诉吗？怎么加入？望指点。我的邮箱：hbzhu66@hotmail.com

 

[星星点点]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没

失望，律师总是有理由，这样还需要起诉么，耗都耗到了。。。

对我请他请人手并且加快备案的问题，律师做了第一时间回复。大意是他准备到递交要一个月，对方回复需要一个月，中间回应又需10天，到了法官那里还需2周。算算三月就进去了。


Dear Ruth,


I have thirty days to submit my arguments; DoJ has thirty days to respond, after which I have ten days to reply. DoJ almost always takes the full thirty days. After the file is complete, it ordinarily takes two weeks before the file is in front off a judge. As the next organizational meeting will not occur until February, and until it occurs, I do not have instruction on how to proceed, our thirty days will not begin until that meeting has occurred.


Finally, trust me, no one would agree to prepare the written arguments, serve and file them for $300. So, you really should not be expecting me either to pay others out of my own pocket or for them to work virtually for free. (The court filing fee is $50.)


Regards,


Tim

 

[星星点点]

回复: 北京起诉的情况,有人想加入没


应该可以加入，费用可能会提高，我们交第一期是$300.可以直接给律师发邮件，或打电话给其中国代理，先把这个帖子的内容了解清楚吧。
律师Tim Leahy的e-mail: TEL@unfaircic.com;

中国代理赵立新mp: 013901119311 / 018611191755
e-mail: zhaolixin@hotmail.com

现在还可以加入起诉吗？怎么加入？望指点。我的邮箱：hbzhu66@hotmail.com