那你就落伍了,看了HISTORY 频道最新一期的DOCUMENTARY《The history of humankind》没有?costco有卖的。其实你这种方法不够聪明,现在最阴险的贬低基督的方法,就是把他说成一个普通的历史人物,一个伟人,从人本主义角度否定耶稣的神性。你费这么大劲否定一个虚无,有啥说服力呀?全球三分之一的人都是奉他的名祷告,连另外三分之二中的伊斯兰教都不否认耶稣的历史性,你得提高一下策略了。
《The history of humankind》 probably is too long for him. I would invite him to watch this short video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=fck0RUuJ_v4
Please pay attention to how embarrassed Dawkins was when Lennox pointed out that he was lying when he denied the historical truthfulness of the existence of Jesus Christ. If you really want save your time, please jump to 8 minute 36 seconds directly.
一、是否有可靠的旁证材料?也就是说,在福音书成书之前或成书后不久,有
没有非基督教的资料记载耶稣的生平?至少也应提及耶稣之名?这样的材料是真实
的,抑或是后来的基督徒篡入的?
二、如果没有可靠的旁证材料,福音书的记载是否可靠?福音书是不是亲眼见
过耶稣的人所写?福音书共有四篇,其记载是否一致?抑或充满了互相矛盾,难以
自圆其说之处?
如果对这两个问题的回答都是否定的,那么耶稣的历史真实性就非常不可靠。
《The history of humankind》 probably is too long for him. I would invite him to watch this short video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=fck0RUuJ_v4
Please pay attention to how embarrassed Dawkins was when Lennox pointed out that he was lying when he denied the historical truthfulness of the existence of Jesus Christ. If you really want save your time, please jump to 8 minute 36 seconds directly.
26 小时的耶鲁大学公开课,我在看第二遍。
你除了骂 dawkins 你还有什么观点啊? 不抄圣经你能说什么啊?
I just said you were trying to change the topic in midst of a discussion AGAIN.
The Dawkins videos were just a simple response to your side-tracking comments on your Yale lectures bla bla.
Dawkins is the Champion of Atheists. If he cannot stands the rebuke of a Christians. Then, my enormous pity on atheists is well justified. Don't you agree?