登陆定居 仲星火病逝享年90岁




就是他。老演员里面有的是正反派都演,这位从没见过演好人的 。。。


哈哈,是他呀,看到后就想起来了,老反派!
 


现在看来 电影里 落后分子说的话 反而更生活化 合符人性中 自然的部分


在那个一本正经的年代,反派演员的台词儿往往成为大家谈笑风生、活跃气氛的噱头,小孩子们尤其如此。。。

记得青松岭里落后分子钱广的著名台词儿:我怎么嘀!就是当时的一句名言 。。。
 


现在看来 电影里 落后分子说的话 反而更生活化 合符人性中 自然的部分


在那个一本正经的年代,反派演员的台词儿往往成为大家谈笑风生、活跃气氛的噱头,小孩子们尤其如此。。。

记得青松岭里落后分子钱广的著名台词儿:我怎么嘀!就是当时的一句名言 。。。
 
现在都是从学习出来就开始上工,没有生活体验,光有技巧,没有实质的假演。。。no enthusiasm.
电视剧进步太多了,我最近看了几部, 非常的不错, the big C,weeds, affairs, 前一段看的几个, ray donovan, shameless, breaking bad,
很多优秀的年轻演员,
 

大拿

Miroir de la vie
在过度商业化背景下,电影好不好是以票房收入高低为标准的,电影人急功近利,最好的技术、阵容,包装,只不过来掩盖空洞无物的内容 。。。

新概念英语里有文评述过:What characterizes almost all Hollywood pictures is their inner emptiness. This is compensated for by an outer impressiveness ...
 
最后编辑: 2014-12-28

大拿

Miroir de la vie
What characterizes almost all Hollywood pictures is their inner emptiness.
This emptiness is compensated for by an outer impressiveness.
Such impressiveness usually takes the form of a truly grandiose realism.
Nothing is spared to make the setting, the costumes, all the surface details correct.
These efforts help to mask the essential emptiness of the characterization, the absurdities and trivilities of the plots.
The houses look like houses, the streets look like streets, the people look and talk like people.
But they are empty of humanity, credibility and motivation.
Needless to say, the disgraceful censorship code is an important factor in predetermining the content the these pictures.
But the code does not disturb the profits, not the entertainment value of the films. It merely helps to prevent them from being credible. It's not too heavy a burden for the industry to bear.
In addition to the impressiveness of the settings, there is a use of the camera which at times seems magical. But of what human import is all this skill, all this effort, all this energy in the production of effects, when the story, the representation of life is hollow, stupid, banal, childish?
 
最后编辑: 2014-12-28
今天看的这个好。是看评论就不错。I don't know if it's a good thing, tanks in so close distances between them in an urban battle. I don't know if US Abrams is better. But I saw them burning well in Irak, and I saw them completely burnt (btw, I don't know if the T-72 is safer). To my mind, only Israelian Merkava last versions and British Challenger 2 are armored enough to do this job. I don't know if people who comment here are, or were, part of a tank crew somewhere in the world. I did my draft a long time ago in West Germany during the Cold War in a former Cuirassier regiment. And I'm happy to be old enough to not have to fight in this kind of urban shithole one day. But guys. These Syrians are brave. Whatever they are. Regular soldiers or rebels.
 
What characterizes almost all Hollywood pictures is their inner emptiness.
This emptiness is compensated for by an outer impressiveness.
Such impressiveness usually takes the form of a truly grandiose realism.
Nothing is spared to make the setting, the costumes, all the surface details correct.
These efforts help to mask the essential emptiness of the characterization, the absurdities and trivilities of the plots.
The houses look like houses, the streets look like streets, the people look and talk like people.
But they are empty of humanity, credibility and motivation.
Needless to say, the disgraceful censorship code is an important factor in predetermining the content the these pictures.
But the code does not disturb the profits, not the entertainment value of the films. It merely helps to prevent them from being credible. It's not too heavy a burden for the industry to bear.
In addition to the impressiveness of the settings, there is a use of the camera which at times seems magical. But of what human import is all this skill, all this effort, all this energy in the production of effects, when the story, the representation of life is hollow, stupid, banal, childish?
garbage
 

注册或登录来发表评论

您必须是注册会员才可以发表评论

注册帐号

注册帐号. 太容易了!

登录

已有帐号? 在这里登录.

Similar threads

顶部