Guns are the guarantors of equality。youtube视频下面的评论有人就说了不能禁枪这事
Logician2 小时前
This is why your 2nd amendment right is so important. It's important to be armed for self-defense. You never know when someone attacks. When seconds count, police are minutes away.
Avast Mehearties1 4 小时前
I don't understand why most feminists are against gun control. Look at this shit - those three black guys would have easily overpowered her and may even have killed her. But with a handgun, that woman was able to fend off all of them. Guns are the guarantors of equality.
就说整个案子,你报警是事发以后,入室盗窃的人跑了的时候才能电话讲清楚。开始女事主是报警来着,后来事发突然电话断了,911又打到女事主的手机上。
报警不能帮助你免于被盗,因为警察要先知道发生了什么,接警的等级,等他们确认是盗窃没有流血,没有伤害,就不知道什么时候来你家了。
视频开始,入室盗窃的人三个人从正门三个人持三把手枪,如果真盗窃为毛要每个人一把手枪呢?三个手枪,但是女事主开枪反击以后,他们鸟散,
着说明黑人是为了盗窃,并不是像伤人?还是被女事主的英勇反击吓倒了?
现在的入室盗窃美国都需要带这么多枪,这么多人一起上?
抢银行也就是2到3个人吧,这都赶上抢银行了
女子开了一枪以后,黑人做鸟散状,最后撤离的被女子开枪打中了。报警的过程中警察询问他们是否开枪,女子回答,他们开枪了。但是从视频上来看,是女子先开的枪,而且逃跑中也没有看到他们开枪,确实三个人每人一把枪。
问题是,如果整个监控没有显示黑人盗匪开枪,女子开枪打死了其中一个,按照美国法律在自家土地上开枪打死入侵者,是不需要承担法律责任的是吗?
那为什么911问,他们是否开枪呢?