你这么客气， 本来想辩论辩论的， 闹的我没话说了， 失落，
失落就失落吧， 我刚看了一篇文章， 挺有意思， 名字叫， the others, 经济学人上的， 讲的是移民的事， 焦点在心情，
开头：
FOR the first time in history, across much of the world, to be foreign is a perfectly normal condition. It is no more distinctive than being tall, fat or left-handed. Nobody raises an eyebrow at a Frenchman in Berlin, a Zimbabwean in London, a Russian in Paris, a Chinese in New York.
。。。
中间一段
And yes, no doubt many people do feel most at ease with a home and a homeland. But what about the others, who find home oppressive and foreignness liberating? Theirs is a choice that gets both easier and more difficult to exercise with every passing year. Easier, because the globalisation of industry and education tramples national borders. More difficult, because there are ever fewer places left in this globalised world where you can go and feel utterly foreign when you get there.
。。。
中间又一段
Perhaps foreigners are, by their nature, hard to satisfy. A foreigner is, after all, someone who didn’t like his own country enough to stay there. Even so, the complaining foreigner poses something of a logical contradiction. He complains about the country in which he finds himself, yet he is there by choice. Why doesn’t he go home?
。。。
结尾
But we cannot expect to have it all ways. Life is full of choices, and to choose one thing is to forgo another. The dilemma of foreignness comes down to one of liberty versus fraternity―the pleasures of freedom versus the pleasures of belonging. The homebody chooses the pleasures of belonging. The foreigner chooses the pleasures of freedom, and the pains that go with them.
全文和一些读者评论
http://www.economist.com/world/international/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15108690
不过今天在英才学校赵校长
出面调解下，顺利解决了。
我小孩觉得这样挺不好，想出面制止（他年龄比当事人小，但个头大很多），刚站起来，自己让自己给伴倒了，
又不巧自己整个人倒在当事人怀里，手中的书也不小心拍在当事人头上了，当事人大怒，觉得自己年龄大，来得时间挺长（比我小孩早来一年多），那受得了这种气，站起来就抓住我小孩的衣领，并把我小孩的眼镜打落在地，
我小孩本来只是想和出面制止他不要说脏话，书也是不小心拍在他头上，当事人却冲上来打人，自己也没有控制住自己，冲动地把书和眼镜抛到一边，跟当事人对打起来.......
