康尼到处宣扬C38经得起司法考验不怕告，是此地无银三百两！法院判决表明C38确有违宪之嫌！

[dussy2]

回复: 康尼到处宣扬C38经得起司法考验不怕告，是此地无银三百两！法院判决表明C38确有违宪之嫌！

那我可真要注意“舆论导向”了！

是啊，楼主当时还问我什么意思，我都蒙了。

 

[xzh6339]

回复: 康尼到处宣扬C38经得起司法考验不怕告，是此地无银三百两！法院判决表明C38确有违宪之嫌！

生活很郁闷了。最喜欢每天早上打开家园网能看到让人充满希望的话。哪怕这个希望真地只是小小的。我不怕再等五年，我不怕这个官司会旷日持久。我怕绝望。

same here!

 

[luo-ai-wen]

回复: 康尼到处宣扬C38经得起司法考验不怕告，是此地无银三百两！法院判决表明C38确有违宪之嫌！

人心齐，泰山移！

 

[big-wolf]

回复: 康尼到处宣扬C38经得起司法考验不怕告，是此地无银三百两！法院判决表明C38确有违宪之嫌！

人心齐，泰山移！

 

[shaohaiyue]

回复: 康尼到处宣扬C38经得起司法考验不怕告，是此地无银三百两！法院判决表明C38确有违宪之嫌！

加拿大大部分老外都有这个特点， 就是嘴硬， 就是错了， 他也不好意思改口， 就一定坚持自己是对的，其实自己心里慢慢也明镜似的， 但是有不好意思说自己当时错了， 就这样一直挺着坚持着，我在这边生活， 对老外处事方式的感觉是这样。所以， 怎么办最好呢？给他个台阶下，又怕他得寸进尺，一直对立着，好像老外就更加变本加厉，怎么拿捏这个尺度，大家可以各抒己见。

 

[东门西雨]

回复: 康尼到处宣扬C38经得起司法考验不怕告，是此地无银三百两！法院判决表明C38确有违宪之嫌！

雅思阅读理解练习，纯学术探讨角度。
新断句模式

[9] Mr. Datta has failed to establish irreparable harm.
(His claim to harm rests on a supposition
that his file will not be processed because it may be legislatively abolished before it is considered on
its merits. According to Mr. Datta, this would render an order for mandamus pointless.)


This argument similarly rests on speculation and speculation does not constitute irreparable harm:

(see Canada (AG) v United States Steel Corp, 2010 FCA 200 at para 7, [2010] FCJ no 902 (QL) and Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants v Canada (MCI), 2011 FC 669 at para 28, 391 FTR 100.)

It is also not obvious that the Court would be powerless to do justice between the parties in the face of some unlawful act or unconstitutional legislation.

括号里面的拿掉以后,
[9] Mr. Datta has failed to establish irreparable harm.

This argument similarly rests on speculation and speculation does not constitute irreparable harm:

It is also not obvious that the Court would be powerless to do justice between the parties in the face of some unlawful act or unconstitutional legislation.



再调整一下,

the Court would be powerless to do justice

(between the parties(when they are) in the face of some unlawful act or unconstitutional legislation.)

is also not obvious.

 

[tss]

回复: 康尼到处宣扬C38经得起司法考验不怕告，是此地无银三百两！法院判决表明C38确有违宪之嫌！

顶顶，正在备考雅思的可以拿这个练习一下阅读技巧

雅思阅读理解练习，纯学术探讨角度。
新断句模式

[9] Mr. Datta has failed to establish irreparable harm.
(His claim to harm rests on a supposition
that his file will not be processed because it may be legislatively abolished before it is considered on
its merits. According to Mr. Datta, this would render an order for mandamus pointless.)


This argument similarly rests on speculation and speculation does not constitute irreparable harm:

(see Canada (AG) v United States Steel Corp, 2010 FCA 200 at para 7, [2010] FCJ no 902 (QL) and Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants v Canada (MCI), 2011 FC 669 at para 28, 391 FTR 100.)

It is also not obvious that the Court would be powerless to do justice between the parties in the face of some unlawful act or unconstitutional legislation.

括号里面的拿掉以后,
[9] Mr. Datta has failed to establish irreparable harm.

This argument similarly rests on speculation and speculation does not constitute irreparable harm:

It is also not obvious that the Court would be powerless to do justice between the parties in the face of some unlawful act or unconstitutional legislation.



再调整一下,

the Court would be powerless to do justice

(between the parties(when they are) in the face of some unlawful act or unconstitutional legislation.)

is also not obvious.

 

[paradiseunderthesun]

回复: 康尼到处宣扬C38经得起司法考验不怕告，是此地无银三百两！法院判决表明C38确有违宪之嫌！

顶