- 主题发起人 小葡萄
- 发布时间 2014-04-03
suzuki的视频不错，
缺点是打感情牌， 民主社会知情权啊， 资本家爱钱啊，
我比较反感打感情牌的，
缺点是打感情牌， 民主社会知情权啊， 资本家爱钱啊，
我比较反感打感情牌的，
全部都是废话空话，我自己好多年不怎么看电视了，好多作科研的博士家里都没有电视机。从“科研”角度讲，电视只能是面向大众的一般宣传，Suzuki也好，崔永元也罢，他们只是个电视节目人，他们根本连教科书都不看（也就是“三次文献”都不看，他们的话是不能作为科研依据的，几乎没有任何可信度）。假如有医学新发现、调查最新科研进展，医学工作者会用专门的搜索引擎，不是百度、不是google, 常用搜索引擎之一是pubmed, 这是我们做科研和查阅科技进展常用的搜索引擎之一。
在pubmed, 搜到Suzuki文献１１篇，全部都是大众科普类文章。而他的An Introduction to Genetic Analysis，是1976年的，老天爷！1976到今天，基因技术发生了多大的变化，你知道吗？早已天壤之别了！
转基因食品安全方面，没有搜到什么革命性的文章，尽管这个话题和老百姓生活息息相关，但是眼下的科研都会谨慎地下结论：尚未发现毒副作用，或者“与相应非转基因植物比，未见不同”（这个用辞，也是FDA对于GMO的一贯谨慎用辞）。严谨的医学科研，讲究的是大样本、对照、随机，要言之有据，有大量的引文（这些引文也都可以Pubmed检索到）不是“我感觉，我认为”，而是讲究循证。贴两篇有代表性的review,第一篇有PDF格式原文；第二篇是英国学者的综述摘要：
Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials.
Collaborators (37)
Alink G, Barlow S, Cockburn A, Flachowsky G, Knudsen I, Kuiper H, Massin DP, Pascal G, Peijnenburg A, Phipps R, Pöting A, Poulsen M, Seinen W, Spielmann H, van Loveren H, Wal JM, Williams A, Andersson HC, Arpaia S, Bartsch D, Casacuberta J, Davies H, De Loose M, Hendriksen N, Herman L, Kärenlampi S, Kiss J, Kryspin-Sørensen I, Kuiper H, Nes I, Panopoulos N, Perry J, Pöting A, Schiemann J, Seinen W, Sweet J, Wal JM.
Abstract
In this report the various elements of the safety and nutritional assessment procedure for genetically modified (GM) plant derived food and feed are discussed, in particular the potential and limitations of animal feeding trials for the safety and nutritional testing of whole GM food and feed. The general principles for the risk assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed are followed, as described in the EFSA guidance document of the EFSA Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms. In Section 1 the mandate, scope and general principles for risk assessment of GM plant derived food and feed are discussed. Products under consideration are food and feed derived from GM plants, such as maize, soybeans, oilseed rape and cotton, modified through the introduction of one or more genes coding for agronomic input traits like herbicide tolerance and/or insect resistance. Furthermore GM plant derived food and feed, which have been obtained through extensive genetic modifications targeted at specific alterations of metabolic pathways leading to improved nutritional and/or health characteristics, such as rice containing beta-carotene, soybeans with enhanced oleic acid content, or tomato with increased concentration of flavonoids, are considered. The safety assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed follows a comparative approach, i.e. the food and feed are compared with their non-GM counterparts in order to identify intended and unintended (unexpected) differences which subsequently are assessed with respect to their potential impact on the environment, safety for humans and animals, and nutritional quality. Key elements of the assessment procedure are the molecular, compositional, phenotypic and agronomic analysis in order to identify similarities and differences between the GM plant and its near isogenic counterpart. The safety assessment is focussed on (i) the presence and characteristics of newly expressed proteins and other new constituents and possible changes in the level of natural constituents beyond normal variation, and on the characteristics of the GM food and feed, and (ii) the possible occurrence of unintended (unexpected) effects in GM plants due to genetic modification. In order to identify these effects a comparative phenotypic and molecular analysis of the GM plant and its near isogenic counterpart is carried out, in parallel with a targeted analysis of single specific compounds, which represent important metabolic pathways in the plant like macro and micro nutrients, known anti-nutrients and toxins. Significant differences may be indicative of the occurrence of unintended effects, which require further investigation. Section 2 provides an overview of studies performed for the safety and nutritional assessment of whole food and feed. Extensive experience has been built up in recent decades from the safety and nutritional testing in animals of irradiated foods, novel foods and fruit and vegetables. These approaches are also relevant for the safety and nutritional testing of whole GM food and feed. Many feeding trials have been reported in which GM foods like maize, potatoes, rice, soybeans and tomatoes have been fed to rats or mice for prolonged periods, and parameters such as body weight, feed consumption, blood chemistry, organ weights, histopathology etc have been measured. The food and feed under investigation were derived from GM plants with improved agronomic characteristics like herbicide tolerance and/or insect resistance. The majority of these experiments did not indicate clinical effects or histopathological abnormalities in organs or tissues of exposed animals. In some cases adverse effects were noted, which were difficult to interpret due to shortcomings in the studies. Many studies have also been carried out with feed derived from GM plants with agronomic input traits in target animal species to assess the nutritive value of the feed and their performance potential. Studies in sheep, pigs, broilers, lactating dairy cows, and fish, comparing the in vivo bioavailability of nutrients from a range of GM plants with their near isogenic counterpart and commercial varieties, showed that they were comparable with those for near isogenic non-GM lines and commercial varieties. In Section 3 toxicological in vivo, in silico, and in vitro test methods are discussed which may be applied for the safety and nutritional assessment of specific compounds present in food and feed or of whole food and feed derived from GM plants. Moreover the purpose, potential and limitations of the 90-day rodent feeding trial for the safety and nutritional testing of whole food and feed have been examined. Methods for single and repeated dose toxicity testing, reproductive and developmental toxicity testing and immunotoxicity testing, as described in OECD guideline tests for single well-defined chemicals are discussed and considered to be adequate for the safety testing of single substances including new products in GM food and feed. Various in silico and in vitro methods may contribute to the safety assessment of GM plant derived food and feed and components thereof, like (i) in silico searches for sequence homology and/or structural similarity of novel proteins or their degradation products to known toxic or allergenic proteins, (ii) simulated gastric and intestinal fluids in order to study the digestive stability of newly expressed proteins and in vitro systems for analysis of the stability of the novel protein under heat or other processing conditions, and (iii) in vitro genotoxicity test methods that screen for point mutations, chromosomal aberrations and DNA damage/repair. The current performance of the safety assessment of whole foods is mainly based on the protocols for low-molecular-weight chemicals such as pharmaceuticals, industrial chemicals, pesticides, food additives and contaminants. However without adaptation, these protocols have limitations for testing of whole food and feed. This primarily results from the fact that defined single substances can be dosed to laboratory animals at very large multiples of the expected human exposure, thus giving a large margin of safety. In contrast foodstuffs are bulky, lead to satiation and can only be included in the diet at much lower multiples of expected human intakes. When testing whole foods, the possible highest concentration of the GM food and feed in the laboratory animal diet may be limited because of nutritional imbalance of the diet, or by the presence of compounds with a known toxicological profile. The aim of the 90-days rodent feeding study with the whole GM food and feed is to assess potential unintended effects of toxicological and/or nutritional relevance and to establish whether the GM food and feed is as safe and nutritious as its traditional comparator rather than determining qualitative and quantitative intrinsic toxicity of defined food constituents. The design of the study should be adapted from the OECD 90-day rodent toxicity study. The precise study design has to take into account the nature of the food and feed and the characteristics of the new trait(s) and their intended role in the GM food and feed. A 90-day animal feeding trial has a large capacity (sensitivity and specificity) to detect potential toxicological effects of single well defined compounds. This can be concluded from data reported on the toxicology of a wide range of industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, food substances, environmental, and agricultural chemicals. It is possible to model the sensitivity of the rat subchronic feeding study for the detection of hypothetically increased amount of compounds such as anti-nutrients, toxicants or secondary metabolites. With respect to the detection of potential unintended effects in whole GM food and feed, it is unlikely that substances present in small amounts and with a low toxic potential will result in any observable (unintended) effects in a 90-day rodent feeding study, as they would be below the no-observed-effect-level and thus of unlikely impact to human health at normal intake levels. Laboratory animal feeding studies of 90-days duration appear to be sufficient to pick up adverse effects of diverse compounds that would also give adverse effects after chronic exposure. This conclusion is based on literature data from studies investigating whether toxicological effects are adequately identified in 3-month subchronic studies in rodents, by comparing findings at 3 and 24 months for a range of different chemicals. The 90-day rodent feeding study is not designed to detect effects on reproduction or development other than effects on adult reproductive organ weights and histopathology. Analyses of available data indicate that, for a wide range of substances, reproductive and developmental effects are not potentially more sensitive endpoints than those examined in subchronic toxicity tests. Should there be structural alerts for reproductive/developmental effects or other indications from data available on a GM food and feed, then these tests should be considered. By relating the estimated daily intake, or theoretical maximum daily intake per capita for a given whole food (or the sum of its individual commercial constituents) to that consumed on average per rat per day in the subchronic 90-day feeding study, it is possible to establish the margin of exposure (safety margin) for consumers. Results obtained from testing GM food and feed in rodents indicate that large (at least 100-fold) 'safety' margins exist between animal exposure levels without observed adverse effects and estimated human daily intake. Results of feeding studies with feed derived from GM plants with improved agronomic properties, carried out in a wide range of livestock species, are discussed. The studies did not show any biologically relevant differences in the parameters tested between control and test animals. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
原文链接：http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/1057.pdf
Assessment of the health impact of GM plant diets in long-term and multigenerational animal feeding trials: a literature review.
Snell C1, Bernheim A, Bergé JB, Kuntz M, Pascal G, Paris A, Ricroch AE.
Author information
- 1University of Nottingham, School of Biosciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE12 5RD, United Kingdom.
The aim of this systematic review was to collect data concerning the effects of diets containing GM maize, potato, soybean, rice, or triticale on animal health. We examined 12 long-term studies (of more than 90 days, up to 2 years in duration) and 12 multigenerational studies (from 2 to 5 generations). We referenced the 90-day studies on GM feed for which long-term or multigenerational study data were available. Many parameters have been examined using biochemical analyses, histological examination of specific organs, hematology and the detection of transgenic DNA. The statistical findings and methods have been considered from each study. Results from all the 24 studies do not suggest any health hazards and, in general, there were no statistically significant differences within parameters observed. However, some small differences were observed, though these fell within the normal variation range of the considered parameter and thus had no biological or toxicological significance. If required, a 90-day feeding study performed in rodents, according to the OECD Test Guideline, is generally considered sufficient in order to evaluate the health effects of GM feed. The studies reviewed present evidence to show that GM plants are nutritionally equivalent to their non-GM counterparts and can be safely used in food and feed.
我很好奇不知道小葡萄还有什么话说。因为每次我们认为她服输了，结果再出来还是让人大吃一惊，还教训你被CCTV洗脑了呵呵，我只是个普通医学工作者，只是告诉大家哪里有可信的信息，基因方面我几乎也是门外汉，虽然我当年的研究生课题和基因挂边儿。
和楼主争下去，医学同行该笑话我欺凌弱小了。小葡萄和信佛，游走与神学和科学之间，迷茫且逻辑混乱，其原因是读书太少，受教育太少。但这没有影响你俩的善良和正直。
你俩，念经去吧！
仍然是将自己的判断基础建构在等待别人证明自己的错误之上， 熊猫的眼影貌似已经成了眼罩了， 浑然天成的有眼无珠，视而不见。
这帖看到这里还是挺有意思的。愿意好好为这个与自身息息相关的议题而下点功夫看书的人还是不少。
我们所受的教育， 是让我们简单的从两篇英文报告里，就认定GMO的商品是无毒无害的吗？ 让我们认定此结论的原因， 是因为GMO尚且无法被足够的”直接证据“证明是有毒有害的， 可是却有许多的直接的证据证明他们是 无毒无害的。
那么，让我们来看看这些直接证据， 到底是用的什么证明方法。。。。
1。2012 年 7名英国诺丁汉大学， 据悉应为生科学院学生的报告， 实验时间介于90天到部分可长达2年。
2。2008年欧洲食品安全局的GMO食品動物飼養試驗小組的一则报告中， 以90天为主要实验进程(部分可长达2年）， 做出的一份针对预估人类每日对GMO商品的摄取量是否会毒害人类为主的报告。 主要是以老鼠为实验对象， 结论之一则是 - 虽然在大量使用GMO商品的老鼠身上有发现异常，但是没有直接证据证明这些异常与GMO食品相关（跟吃的没关？那时跟啥有关呢？）。 而以其推算每日的成人预测摄取量，GMO商品应不至于称之为有毒或有害。
看完这两篇， 我不知道支持转基因的人士， 还需要什么实验，什么报告才能自我觉醒GMO是不太可以无忧无虑的被使用？至少在孕妇及孩童的身上， 令人揣揣不安。
而反对转基因的人士，又期望在转基因议题上， 获得什么科学证据？如果一项影响至巨的生物工程，都可以在FDA， EFSA里被廉价的以90天到2年的实验报告给发表， 那么控管只是虚设，科学实验沦为买卖。
病了找解药本来就是物竞天择的一环， 谁说自然法则里生病了不给治的？没听过一物克一物吗？ 熊猫照这种概念自然死亡法难怪会给灭了种。
E. coli O157:H7.
把你的眼罩掀开看个清楚点，这可不是乱码， 也不是密码， 是一种大肠杆菌的通名。
Grain-fed 的牛群，其胃内的环境和人类一样是强酸性的。 因此在牛身上的大肠杆菌， 可以轻而易举的经由销售进入我们人类的消化系统中。市面上几次大规模的牛肉商品回收事件也都跟这个小菌有关。 这个菌，最初在大约1982年时被发现的时候， 被认为应该是与农场饲料喂养的畜牧方式有关。 这不是转基因的原罪， 而是人类无知却自大自私的证明。
趴粪妹，我早就说过是大肠杆菌，你罗嗦了半天才吭出来。大肠杆菌在所有动物的结肠里都存在，也会通过粪便排出，但是在正常组织里是不可能存在的。所以如果牛肉被大肠杆菌污染，只有一种可能，就是被动物的肠内容物或者粪便污染，然后这些细菌被吃下去导致发病，这叫病原的粪-口传播。哪怕是吃草的牛，如果屠宰场卫生管控不佳一样会出现这种情况。
另外，请你拿出原文，你的转述相当不专业。
另外，请你拿出原文，你的转述相当不专业。
Similar threads
美食天地
异国食谱(16)：吞拿鱼起司面包
- 0.00 超赞 赏
- Bingoye ,#279
- 2024-09-21
- 生活・购物・亲子・教育・美食・旅游
2024-09-28有新赞
全楼:0.00
Bingoye
- 0.04 超赞 赏
- mmn323
- 2023-12-20
- 多伦多
2023-12-30有新回复
全楼:0.06
oldpanda
