回复: 期待北京版有人完善交给使馆的联名信
要不，我来试试做个草稿？
要不，我来试试做个草稿？
期待北京版有人完善交给使馆的联名信
- 主题发起人 paradiseunderthesun
- 发布时间 2012-05-30
回复: 期待北京版有人完善交给使馆的联名信
我综合S2打分和未打分的BJ 91 TX情况，在原信基础上添加的少许内容，原信不知哪位大侠写的？写得很好！谢谢他/她。我增添的内容以蓝色粗体字显示其中：
Since our submission of supporting documents in 2009, no one tried to inform us how long we will continue to wait and what changes will or have been made after our submission. You may not know what source of power has supported us to bear this endless waiting, that is, in one simple word: trust. We have kind of faith that Canadian government is a responsible government and can always be trusted. Our courage to choose Canada to be our new home does not come from possible material prosperity but a fair society and due respect for every human being. We trust you will adhere to the principle that application will be assessed according to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and Regulations in force at the time that the application is submitted.
Even we are trying our best to face the current situation with rationality and calmness, we still maintain that our cases at least deserve an official notice at present to keep us informed of changes in immigration priority policy and the anticipated waiting time to help us make the right decision as well as show your respect for our time and efforts. So we would show our great appreciation if you could make a clear timetable including expected time frame of the points assessed for immigrant, medical exam and final decision for our cases. But why our applications were stopped almost 3 years before? However we are always informed to be patient because our applications are still processed. Don’t you think we were cheated in deed?
We, though disappointed, still appreciate your efforts in reducing the backlog in FSW application and your open gesture to accept any creative suggestions, as you have shown at the Economic Club of Canada Event. So we would like propose our solutions for Pre-C50 applicants as follows:
1.The quickest measure should be capping immigration applications for clearing backlog. More resources shall be put in dealing with backlogs.
2. A copy of New Zealand’s legislation against backlog will not work for Canada because of much larger volume of backlog cases. By doing so, you will completely destroy the trustful and responsible public image of Canada. Simply setting up pool will be extremely unfair to applicants especially those who have passed the visa officer’s review and submitted their supporting documents because they have put great efforts, both financially and in time, in taking the IELTS exam and collecting all the documents.
Granting visas to these people in the most recent time can be a win-win game because these people, being much more prepared in terms of language and skills during this long-time waiting, can benefit the economy if they can fill the labor market shortage as soon as possible.
3. Please improve transparency in processing information and selection priority policy for all backlog cases. Please keep us informed by email of current backlog situation, current stage of processing and anticipated processing time.
4. Recruiting new immigrants who would like to settle in less developed areas such as Atlantic Provinces or middle provinces. Binding contracts shall be signed along with issuance of visas to ensure applicants to stay and work in these places during a designated time period.
At the end of this letter, we would like to quote what one new immigrant from Beijing says about her impression of Canadians:
“I discussed the differences between Canadians and Americans with one local friend the other day, his answer was simple but unforgettable to me: We Canadians always take considerations of others .We will never do anything merely out of our interest. That is the difference between Canadian and Americans.”
Yes, this difference is the real attraction of Canadian and the nation they represent.
Honorable Minister, if you are considering losing the trust from we 30,0000 backlogged applicants, if you keep on thrusting our complaints and comments aside, if you would like to pose such an extremely unfair decision upon us, you will make Canada much less attractive to the world and in turn fundamentally harm the interest of Canada.
We truly hope you can take consideration of our comments and make fair decisions over backlogs.
Thank you for your attention and your early reply is highly appreciated.
Best wishes.
我综合S2打分和未打分的BJ 91 TX情况，在原信基础上添加的少许内容，原信不知哪位大侠写的？写得很好！谢谢他/她。我增添的内容以蓝色粗体字显示其中：
Dear Honorable Minister,
We are writing on behalf of all the FSW applicants under the Pre-C50 stream from Beijing. As you may know, most of us submitted applications in 2007 and supporting documents in 2009 as requested. CAIPS notes obtained three years ago showed we were at the stage of waiting medical exam request letter. Unfortunately, our applications have been postponed until now due to jump queue of later applicants and the waiting seems to be endless.
Some of us, after submission of supporting documents, made enquiries of application status in late 2010 and got answers from the Visa Office that our applications were in queue for sending out medical exam letter and the only thing being asked to do is to be patient. Some of us even tried to obtain CAIPS notes and the result were also very positive: the only thing we were left to do was medical exam when requested. So we just waited patiently for the letter. However, instead of medical exam request letter, unlucky and unexpected message came in late 2011 in visa officer’s feedback to our enquiries: We were not actively processing Federal Skilled Worker cases submitted before February 27, 2008 as there were sufficient applications in process to meet assigned targets. We have never expected our patience ended up with this result.
We are writing on behalf of all the FSW applicants under the Pre-C50 stream from Beijing. As you may know, most of us submitted applications in 2007 and supporting documents in 2009 as requested. CAIPS notes obtained three years ago showed we were at the stage of waiting medical exam request letter. Unfortunately, our applications have been postponed until now due to jump queue of later applicants and the waiting seems to be endless.
Some of us, after submission of supporting documents, made enquiries of application status in late 2010 and got answers from the Visa Office that our applications were in queue for sending out medical exam letter and the only thing being asked to do is to be patient. Some of us even tried to obtain CAIPS notes and the result were also very positive: the only thing we were left to do was medical exam when requested. So we just waited patiently for the letter. However, instead of medical exam request letter, unlucky and unexpected message came in late 2011 in visa officer’s feedback to our enquiries: We were not actively processing Federal Skilled Worker cases submitted before February 27, 2008 as there were sufficient applications in process to meet assigned targets. We have never expected our patience ended up with this result.
You made a promise to process the applications that attained positive comments: "PA has obtained sufficient points to qualify for immigration to Canada". Recently Hong Kong-Immigration Section of Canadian Embassy issued medical examination form very soon and the fastest time is about one week after S2. But meanwhile why the applications who attained positive comments received a message: “Please note that your application status has not changed, still not actively processing SAP cases, awaiting further instructions.” from Beijing-Immigration Section of Canadian Embassy? How to explain the inconsistency?
Since our submission of supporting documents in 2009, no one tried to inform us how long we will continue to wait and what changes will or have been made after our submission. You may not know what source of power has supported us to bear this endless waiting, that is, in one simple word: trust. We have kind of faith that Canadian government is a responsible government and can always be trusted. Our courage to choose Canada to be our new home does not come from possible material prosperity but a fair society and due respect for every human being. We trust you will adhere to the principle that application will be assessed according to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and Regulations in force at the time that the application is submitted.
Even we are trying our best to face the current situation with rationality and calmness, we still maintain that our cases at least deserve an official notice at present to keep us informed of changes in immigration priority policy and the anticipated waiting time to help us make the right decision as well as show your respect for our time and efforts. So we would show our great appreciation if you could make a clear timetable including expected time frame of the points assessed for immigrant, medical exam and final decision for our cases. But why our applications were stopped almost 3 years before? However we are always informed to be patient because our applications are still processed. Don’t you think we were cheated in deed?
We, though disappointed, still appreciate your efforts in reducing the backlog in FSW application and your open gesture to accept any creative suggestions, as you have shown at the Economic Club of Canada Event. So we would like propose our solutions for Pre-C50 applicants as follows:
1.The quickest measure should be capping immigration applications for clearing backlog. More resources shall be put in dealing with backlogs.
2. A copy of New Zealand’s legislation against backlog will not work for Canada because of much larger volume of backlog cases. By doing so, you will completely destroy the trustful and responsible public image of Canada. Simply setting up pool will be extremely unfair to applicants especially those who have passed the visa officer’s review and submitted their supporting documents because they have put great efforts, both financially and in time, in taking the IELTS exam and collecting all the documents.
Granting visas to these people in the most recent time can be a win-win game because these people, being much more prepared in terms of language and skills during this long-time waiting, can benefit the economy if they can fill the labor market shortage as soon as possible.
3. Please improve transparency in processing information and selection priority policy for all backlog cases. Please keep us informed by email of current backlog situation, current stage of processing and anticipated processing time.
4. Recruiting new immigrants who would like to settle in less developed areas such as Atlantic Provinces or middle provinces. Binding contracts shall be signed along with issuance of visas to ensure applicants to stay and work in these places during a designated time period.
At the end of this letter, we would like to quote what one new immigrant from Beijing says about her impression of Canadians:
“I discussed the differences between Canadians and Americans with one local friend the other day, his answer was simple but unforgettable to me: We Canadians always take considerations of others .We will never do anything merely out of our interest. That is the difference between Canadian and Americans.”
Yes, this difference is the real attraction of Canadian and the nation they represent.
Honorable Minister, if you are considering losing the trust from we 30,0000 backlogged applicants, if you keep on thrusting our complaints and comments aside, if you would like to pose such an extremely unfair decision upon us, you will make Canada much less attractive to the world and in turn fundamentally harm the interest of Canada.
We truly hope you can take consideration of our comments and make fair decisions over backlogs.
Thank you for your attention and your early reply is highly appreciated.
Best wishes.
Sincerely yours,
FSW Backlogged Applicants from Beijing
FSW Backlogged Applicants from Beijing
看各位高手谁再完善。
回复: 期待北京版有人完善交给使馆的联名信
我贴个新草稿如下，可能会有些chinglish, 期望大家一起改进。
我贴个新草稿如下，可能会有些chinglish, 期望大家一起改进。
回复: 期待北京版有人完善交给使馆的联名信
Dear Sir/Madame,
As the FSW applicants under the Pre-C50 stream from Beijing, we are
writing here to pretest the refund plan.
As you may know, according to the qualifying criteria CIC published we
submitted our applications about 5 years ago (September, 2006
February, 2008) and delivered completed supported documents as requested
in 2009-2010. During this time, there is no any message, letter or a
piece of policy that states it is possible our applications could be
refunded without our agreement. Furthermore, some notices and letters
reaffirmed our applications will be processed like before. Based on this
kind of information from CIC and our self assessment according to the
existing criteria, most of us gave up a plenty of similar chances and
set our life plans depends on the successes.
Most of us have given up various valued opportunities such as in house
purchasing, promotion, developing business even love, marriage or having
a baby etc. There are so many real cases to show what we lost for the
applications because we are planning to switch our life direction by the
reliable information from CIC.
However, Immigration Minister Jason Kenney and his department proposed a
piece of legislation, under which CIC will eliminate the most of
longstanding backlog of FSW applications applied before February 27,
2008. If this act take effects, our plans combined the lost will prove
to be a joke most of application are not qualified to apply again
under the new criteria even they were willing to trust CIC as before.
We were shocked by this change because we will lose many things. Is this
we deserved it? What we have done wrong about this application? Maybe
the only thing wrong we did is to trust CIC and believe in the fairness
of Canadian culture.
Meanwhile many other people are surprised when they hear this kind of
plan because they cannot believe that will be carried by a cultured
government.
It is true we have different culture and speak different languages with
Canadian, but we believe there is a common rule in the world, which
treats everyone in a just, fair and honesty way. Deceiving, concealing
and hurting should be the last thing we want to see. Unfortunately it
seems we have seen such thing emerging from CIC and Mr. Jason Kenney.
We all are live persons with our families but not some simple files and
numbers. So could you please think over about human feeling before
enjoying the pleasure of eliminating those bored files?
It is definite we can accept the failure of our applications due to
specific reason while we cannot accept our applications are fooled. That
we cannot accept this sinister thing means:
1. We will do all what we can do and align more people whose we can
reach to prevent this plan from taking effect.
2. Even this immoral plan happens, we will do our best to make
people know this is wrong and correct it. The apology and compensation
is necessary for victims.
3. We believe we are on the right side and must keep struggling for
our rights even we have lost interest in immigration, even we finally
get the late justice 100 years later.
Best regards,
FSW Backlogged Applicants from Beijing
Dear Sir/Madame,
As the FSW applicants under the Pre-C50 stream from Beijing, we are
writing here to pretest the refund plan.
As you may know, according to the qualifying criteria CIC published we
submitted our applications about 5 years ago (September, 2006
February, 2008) and delivered completed supported documents as requested
in 2009-2010. During this time, there is no any message, letter or a
piece of policy that states it is possible our applications could be
refunded without our agreement. Furthermore, some notices and letters
reaffirmed our applications will be processed like before. Based on this
kind of information from CIC and our self assessment according to the
existing criteria, most of us gave up a plenty of similar chances and
set our life plans depends on the successes.
Most of us have given up various valued opportunities such as in house
purchasing, promotion, developing business even love, marriage or having
a baby etc. There are so many real cases to show what we lost for the
applications because we are planning to switch our life direction by the
reliable information from CIC.
However, Immigration Minister Jason Kenney and his department proposed a
piece of legislation, under which CIC will eliminate the most of
longstanding backlog of FSW applications applied before February 27,
2008. If this act take effects, our plans combined the lost will prove
to be a joke most of application are not qualified to apply again
under the new criteria even they were willing to trust CIC as before.
We were shocked by this change because we will lose many things. Is this
we deserved it? What we have done wrong about this application? Maybe
the only thing wrong we did is to trust CIC and believe in the fairness
of Canadian culture.
Meanwhile many other people are surprised when they hear this kind of
plan because they cannot believe that will be carried by a cultured
government.
It is true we have different culture and speak different languages with
Canadian, but we believe there is a common rule in the world, which
treats everyone in a just, fair and honesty way. Deceiving, concealing
and hurting should be the last thing we want to see. Unfortunately it
seems we have seen such thing emerging from CIC and Mr. Jason Kenney.
We all are live persons with our families but not some simple files and
numbers. So could you please think over about human feeling before
enjoying the pleasure of eliminating those bored files?
It is definite we can accept the failure of our applications due to
specific reason while we cannot accept our applications are fooled. That
we cannot accept this sinister thing means:
1. We will do all what we can do and align more people whose we can
reach to prevent this plan from taking effect.
2. Even this immoral plan happens, we will do our best to make
people know this is wrong and correct it. The apology and compensation
is necessary for victims.
3. We believe we are on the right side and must keep struggling for
our rights even we have lost interest in immigration, even we finally
get the late justice 100 years later.
Best regards,
FSW Backlogged Applicants from Beijing
最后编辑: 2012-06-03
回复: 期待北京版有人完善交给使馆的联名信
各位好：
作为北京的Pre-C50 FSW申请者，在这里我们表示对退档计划的抗议。
你们或许知道，在大约5年（从2006年6月到2008年 2月期间）前，依照移民局公布
的资格标准我们提交了移民申请，并且在2009年，2010年按要求提交了完整的所需
文件。在此期间，没有任何消息、信件或者政策表达我们的申请可以在未经我们许
可的情况下被退回。而且（相反地），有公告或者信件肯定了我们的申请会按照当
时的程序处理。 基于此类信息，还有我们的自我评估，大多数的人都认为成功只
是时间问题从而舍弃了很多类似机会，还据此设定了自己的人生规划。
我们中的大多数放弃了各种珍贵的机会，诸如置业、晋升、拓展事业甚至恋爱、婚
姻和生育等等。 有很多真实的案例可以反应我们所失去的种种，这些都因为移民
局给了我们可靠的信息，使得我们计划着改变自己的人生目标。
然而，移民部长Jason Kenney和他的部门提出一项立法，据此立法CIC将会抹去大
多数227 2008之前的FSW申请。 如果这项法案生效，我们之前的人生计划连同我们
所失去的将会成为一个笑话 即使有人愿意再相信CIC, （别忘了）大多数申请
者在新标准下将不具备申请资格 (让那些说他们可以再申请的人去死吧)。
对于这种变化，我们很震惊，因为我们将要失去很多。这是我们应得的么（我们活
该如此么） 对于申请，我们做错了什么？ 或许唯一一件错事就是我们相信CIC，
信任加拿大文化中的公平。
同时很多其他人听到这种计划时，他们表示很惊讶因为他们不敢相信这是一个文明
政府所要推行的事。
确实，我们具有着和加拿大人不同文化，说着不同的语言，但我们相信有一种普世
的规则，那就是以一种公平、公证、诚实的方式对待每一个人。 欺骗、隐瞒和伤
害是我们最不愿意看到的。不幸的是，似乎在Mr. Jason Kenney和CIC身上，我们
看到了这样的事情。
我们都是活生生的人还有我们的家庭，不是简单的档案和数字。所以，是不是可以
请你们在享受那种扔掉乏味文档的快感之前，稍稍考虑一下别人的感受？
无疑，我们可以接受申请因明确原因而被拒，但不能接受我们的申请被愚弄。
我们不能接受这样阴险的事情意味着：
1. 我们将做所有能做的和联合尽可能多的人，去阻止这项计划的实施。
2. 即使这种恶法生效，我们将尽我们最大的努力让人们明白这是错误的并且
纠正它。对受害人来说，道歉和赔偿将是必不可少的。
3. 我们相信我们处于对的一方。将会为我们的权益斗争到底哪怕我们已经失
去了移民的兴趣，哪怕最终我们在100年之后才得到这种迟到的正义。
此致，
FSW北京申请人
各位好：
作为北京的Pre-C50 FSW申请者，在这里我们表示对退档计划的抗议。
你们或许知道，在大约5年（从2006年6月到2008年 2月期间）前，依照移民局公布
的资格标准我们提交了移民申请，并且在2009年，2010年按要求提交了完整的所需
文件。在此期间，没有任何消息、信件或者政策表达我们的申请可以在未经我们许
可的情况下被退回。而且（相反地），有公告或者信件肯定了我们的申请会按照当
时的程序处理。 基于此类信息，还有我们的自我评估，大多数的人都认为成功只
是时间问题从而舍弃了很多类似机会，还据此设定了自己的人生规划。
我们中的大多数放弃了各种珍贵的机会，诸如置业、晋升、拓展事业甚至恋爱、婚
姻和生育等等。 有很多真实的案例可以反应我们所失去的种种，这些都因为移民
局给了我们可靠的信息，使得我们计划着改变自己的人生目标。
然而，移民部长Jason Kenney和他的部门提出一项立法，据此立法CIC将会抹去大
多数227 2008之前的FSW申请。 如果这项法案生效，我们之前的人生计划连同我们
所失去的将会成为一个笑话 即使有人愿意再相信CIC, （别忘了）大多数申请
者在新标准下将不具备申请资格 (让那些说他们可以再申请的人去死吧)。
对于这种变化，我们很震惊，因为我们将要失去很多。这是我们应得的么（我们活
该如此么） 对于申请，我们做错了什么？ 或许唯一一件错事就是我们相信CIC，
信任加拿大文化中的公平。
同时很多其他人听到这种计划时，他们表示很惊讶因为他们不敢相信这是一个文明
政府所要推行的事。
确实，我们具有着和加拿大人不同文化，说着不同的语言，但我们相信有一种普世
的规则，那就是以一种公平、公证、诚实的方式对待每一个人。 欺骗、隐瞒和伤
害是我们最不愿意看到的。不幸的是，似乎在Mr. Jason Kenney和CIC身上，我们
看到了这样的事情。
我们都是活生生的人还有我们的家庭，不是简单的档案和数字。所以，是不是可以
请你们在享受那种扔掉乏味文档的快感之前，稍稍考虑一下别人的感受？
无疑，我们可以接受申请因明确原因而被拒，但不能接受我们的申请被愚弄。
我们不能接受这样阴险的事情意味着：
1. 我们将做所有能做的和联合尽可能多的人，去阻止这项计划的实施。
2. 即使这种恶法生效，我们将尽我们最大的努力让人们明白这是错误的并且
纠正它。对受害人来说，道歉和赔偿将是必不可少的。
3. 我们相信我们处于对的一方。将会为我们的权益斗争到底哪怕我们已经失
去了移民的兴趣，哪怕最终我们在100年之后才得到这种迟到的正义。
此致，
FSW北京申请人
回复: 期待北京版有人完善交给使馆的联名信
我把草稿文档中英繁三个都贴上来了，大家可以各抒己见，做做修改。
抗议信的抬头现在不是移民部长，可以改成部长或者是公开、议员等等。
我把草稿文档中英繁三个都贴上来了，大家可以各抒己见，做做修改。
抗议信的抬头现在不是移民部长，可以改成部长或者是公开、议员等等。
P
paradiseunderthesun
Guest
回复: 期待北京版有人完善交给使馆的联名信
谢谢楼上
谢谢楼上
回复: 期待北京版有人完善交给使馆的联名信
中文不错，英文欠佳。对C-38，S.87（3）(4)的抗议再加进去。
中文不错，英文欠佳。对C-38，S.87（3）(4)的抗议再加进去。
回复: 期待北京版有人完善交给使馆的联名信
唉！英文不是一般的欠佳。其实我想个人可以提交各自版本的的抗议信陈情书。只代表个人即可！
唉！英文不是一般的欠佳。其实我想个人可以提交各自版本的的抗议信陈情书。只代表个人即可！
回复: 期待北京版有人完善交给使馆的联名信
We believe we are on the right side and will keep struggling for
our rights even if we had lost interest in immigration, even if we finally
got the late justice 100 years later.
最欣赏这一句！
We believe we are on the right side and will keep struggling for
our rights even if we had lost interest in immigration, even if we finally
got the late justice 100 years later.
最欣赏这一句！
回复: 期待北京版有人完善交给使馆的联名信
如果觉得草稿思路还行的话，大家可以对English doc随手修改了再传上来吧。
集思广益，我想，弄一个真实反映我们不满的的抗议书应该不难！
如果觉得草稿思路还行的话，大家可以对English doc随手修改了再传上来吧。
集思广益，我想，弄一个真实反映我们不满的的抗议书应该不难！
回复: 期待北京版有人完善交给使馆的联名信
我花了点时间，写了一个，仅作参考。如下。
Dear Sir or Madam,
Firstly, thank you very much for taking the time to read this protest letter. As applicants for immigrating to Canada under the Federal Skilled Workers program (FSW, Pre-C50 Stream), we are pleading to you to revoke the inhumane clauses regarding deletion of the pre-2008 cases in the omnibus C-38 Budget Bill.
As directed by the laws and rules published by CIC in 2008 and before, we filed our applications to the specified CIC centers and paid the associated fees demanded by CIC for processing. Upon requests from CIC, we also provided any necessary information or documents pertaining to our immigration application. These correspondences essentially formed a solid contract between CIC and our applicants. Any attempt to rescind this mutual contract unilaterally constitutes a breach of the contractual laws cherished by the Canadian society. Furthermore, while we were anxiously waiting for our turns, CIC continually reaffirmed us that our applications would be processed according to the prescribed legislation, either in its notices to the public or in the replies to our inquiries. For example, (cite an example here to support).
While we were preoccupied by the immigration issues, we had to pass various invaluable career opportunities and screwed up some crucial life plans. Some of the applicants had to give up promotions they had long hankered for because of inabilities to commit to the terms set for the positions. Some of the applicants had to let their money lying idle in the banks because they intended to use the fund to set up a new business in Canada. Some of the applicants had to postpone their marriage ceremonies or childbearing plans because they wanted to build their families in Canada. They are waiting, anxiously but with great understanding, for their turn to move to Canada and start a new home in Canada. By blatantly eliminating their cases, CIC just relentlessly ruins their whole lives.
The most notorious parts of the proposed rules are the retroactive jurisdiction over the old cases and the precluding clause that deprives the wronged any right of recourse and indemnity. They are totally shameless and a blunt slap on the face of human rights and parliamentary practice. A story recalled to me that when testing before the congress, John Pierpont Morgan, a founder of modern American financial system, was asked “Which is more important, credit or interest?” and he answered straightforwardly “Credit.” Though bankers are often associated with greedy practices, J. P. Morgan apparently demonstrated a higher credibility than a governmental bureau currently does. No doubt, this retroactive law will severely damage the credit of Canada as a respectful and trustworthy country. For hundreds of years, Canada enjoys a prestigious fame due to its commitments to building a democratic country and promoting human rights all over the world. Canada boasts its renowned universities, its rich cultural diversities, its clement foreign policies, and so on. However, the proposed precluding clause deviates from Canada’s practice and belies the values held by this society. While as tiny as a grain of sand in the sea in comparison with Canada, a university on a small Pacific island holds highly a slogan” above all nations is humanity”. What a brave declaration! On the contrary, CIC is now depicting a different picture: above all human rights and beliefs and above all good wills and democratic practices is a big, deep, bloody mouth.
We all are not dull, insensible, and lifeless papers and numerals but vivid lives, who laugh aloud when elated, who shed tears when hurt, and who always bear a beautiful dream in mind: far, far away, on a magic land called Canada, a little girl plants a seed in the garden of my new home, watching it grow into a big maple tree, where birds nest and chirp merrily. Please do not shatter my dream!
I plead to you and your colleagues to abide to the common law practices, to defend the credit and name of Canada, to fulfill Canada’s commitment to humanity and integrity, and not to delete the 91-cases but to delete the proposed unfair clauses in the bill.
Thank you again for sparing the time to consider my protest. Should you need any further information, please feel free to contact me by email at XXXX or by phone at XXXX.
Sincerely yours:
Your signature and date
我花了点时间，写了一个，仅作参考。如下。
Dear Sir or Madam,
Firstly, thank you very much for taking the time to read this protest letter. As applicants for immigrating to Canada under the Federal Skilled Workers program (FSW, Pre-C50 Stream), we are pleading to you to revoke the inhumane clauses regarding deletion of the pre-2008 cases in the omnibus C-38 Budget Bill.
As directed by the laws and rules published by CIC in 2008 and before, we filed our applications to the specified CIC centers and paid the associated fees demanded by CIC for processing. Upon requests from CIC, we also provided any necessary information or documents pertaining to our immigration application. These correspondences essentially formed a solid contract between CIC and our applicants. Any attempt to rescind this mutual contract unilaterally constitutes a breach of the contractual laws cherished by the Canadian society. Furthermore, while we were anxiously waiting for our turns, CIC continually reaffirmed us that our applications would be processed according to the prescribed legislation, either in its notices to the public or in the replies to our inquiries. For example, (cite an example here to support).
While we were preoccupied by the immigration issues, we had to pass various invaluable career opportunities and screwed up some crucial life plans. Some of the applicants had to give up promotions they had long hankered for because of inabilities to commit to the terms set for the positions. Some of the applicants had to let their money lying idle in the banks because they intended to use the fund to set up a new business in Canada. Some of the applicants had to postpone their marriage ceremonies or childbearing plans because they wanted to build their families in Canada. They are waiting, anxiously but with great understanding, for their turn to move to Canada and start a new home in Canada. By blatantly eliminating their cases, CIC just relentlessly ruins their whole lives.
The most notorious parts of the proposed rules are the retroactive jurisdiction over the old cases and the precluding clause that deprives the wronged any right of recourse and indemnity. They are totally shameless and a blunt slap on the face of human rights and parliamentary practice. A story recalled to me that when testing before the congress, John Pierpont Morgan, a founder of modern American financial system, was asked “Which is more important, credit or interest?” and he answered straightforwardly “Credit.” Though bankers are often associated with greedy practices, J. P. Morgan apparently demonstrated a higher credibility than a governmental bureau currently does. No doubt, this retroactive law will severely damage the credit of Canada as a respectful and trustworthy country. For hundreds of years, Canada enjoys a prestigious fame due to its commitments to building a democratic country and promoting human rights all over the world. Canada boasts its renowned universities, its rich cultural diversities, its clement foreign policies, and so on. However, the proposed precluding clause deviates from Canada’s practice and belies the values held by this society. While as tiny as a grain of sand in the sea in comparison with Canada, a university on a small Pacific island holds highly a slogan” above all nations is humanity”. What a brave declaration! On the contrary, CIC is now depicting a different picture: above all human rights and beliefs and above all good wills and democratic practices is a big, deep, bloody mouth.
We all are not dull, insensible, and lifeless papers and numerals but vivid lives, who laugh aloud when elated, who shed tears when hurt, and who always bear a beautiful dream in mind: far, far away, on a magic land called Canada, a little girl plants a seed in the garden of my new home, watching it grow into a big maple tree, where birds nest and chirp merrily. Please do not shatter my dream!
I plead to you and your colleagues to abide to the common law practices, to defend the credit and name of Canada, to fulfill Canada’s commitment to humanity and integrity, and not to delete the 91-cases but to delete the proposed unfair clauses in the bill.
Thank you again for sparing the time to consider my protest. Should you need any further information, please feel free to contact me by email at XXXX or by phone at XXXX.
Sincerely yours:
Your signature and date
回复: 期待北京版有人完善交给使馆的联名信
各位辛苦，英文不好的飘过，感谢你们
各位辛苦，英文不好的飘过，感谢你们
回复: 期待北京版有人完善交给使馆的联名信
33楼此段写得很好：“The most notorious parts of the proposed rules are the retroactive jurisdiction over the old cases and the precluding clause that deprives the wronged any right of recourse and indemnity. They are totally shameless and a blunt slap on the face of human rights and parliamentary practice. A story recalled to me that when testing before the congress, John Pierpont Morgan, a founder of modern American financial system, was asked “Which is more important, credit or interest?” and he answered straightforwardly “Credit.” Though bankers are often associated with greedy practices, J. P. Morgan apparently demonstrated a higher credibility than a governmental bureau currently does. No doubt, this retroactive law will severely damage the credit of Canada as a respectful and trustworthy country. For hundreds of years, Canada enjoys a prestigious fame due to its commitments to building a democratic country and promoting human rights all over the world. Canada boasts its renowned universities, its rich cultural diversities, its clement foreign policies, and so on. However, the proposed precluding clause deviates from Canada’s practice and belies the values held by this society. While as tiny as a grain of sand in the sea in comparison with Canada, a university on a small Pacific island holds highly a slogan” above all nations is humanity”. What a brave declaration! On the contrary, CIC is now depicting a different picture: above all human rights and beliefs and above all good wills and democratic practices is a big, deep, bloody mouth.”
北京要阻止恶法行使回溯权，一手遮天！
33楼此段写得很好：“The most notorious parts of the proposed rules are the retroactive jurisdiction over the old cases and the precluding clause that deprives the wronged any right of recourse and indemnity. They are totally shameless and a blunt slap on the face of human rights and parliamentary practice. A story recalled to me that when testing before the congress, John Pierpont Morgan, a founder of modern American financial system, was asked “Which is more important, credit or interest?” and he answered straightforwardly “Credit.” Though bankers are often associated with greedy practices, J. P. Morgan apparently demonstrated a higher credibility than a governmental bureau currently does. No doubt, this retroactive law will severely damage the credit of Canada as a respectful and trustworthy country. For hundreds of years, Canada enjoys a prestigious fame due to its commitments to building a democratic country and promoting human rights all over the world. Canada boasts its renowned universities, its rich cultural diversities, its clement foreign policies, and so on. However, the proposed precluding clause deviates from Canada’s practice and belies the values held by this society. While as tiny as a grain of sand in the sea in comparison with Canada, a university on a small Pacific island holds highly a slogan” above all nations is humanity”. What a brave declaration! On the contrary, CIC is now depicting a different picture: above all human rights and beliefs and above all good wills and democratic practices is a big, deep, bloody mouth.”
北京要阻止恶法行使回溯权，一手遮天！
回复: 期待北京版有人完善交给使馆的联名信
会影响多少BJ 91人？
会影响多少BJ 91人？
注册或登录来发表评论
您必须是注册会员才可以发表评论
注册帐号
注册帐号. 太容易了!
登录
已有帐号? 在这里登录.
Similar threads
2024-09-23有新回复
全楼:0.04
科幻世界
2022-08-21有新赞
全楼:0.00
xchn818
