回复: 近1年的培训以及找工作经验分享
Sorry I haven't checked my private message for quite a long while. Here're responses to some questions from some folks ask
1) 考试准备工作及费用问题
Attending training and attending certification test separate. You don't have to attend training, costing around 3000 USD, to be qualified for attending certification test, costing around 200USD. Actually from my own experiences, attending the training is kind of waste for beginners, because the training is very short, usually 4 days. Later-on I'll re-post the posts I made on linkedin about my own learning experience and how to prepare for the test.
2) 看到您学的这个方向很棒,如果没有编程基础,怎么能跟这个着上边?我觉得云CRM是以后的方向,掌握了相关知识,会很容易找到工作。没有任何编程基础以及数据库基础,可以学吗?自学还是有培训班能上?
It will be very hard if you don't have any generic programming & SQL background to take the Salesforce.com developer as your job course. Basically it's just a new technology, a new platform. That's it. All the others are the same. Besides, all the Salesforce.com( SFDC in short )developer related training will only talk about SFDC technology itself, it won't involve any generic programming skill. It's just like , when Java shew up, you ask "Can I learn Java without any previous programming background". Technically, if you have previous business application development experience with J2EE/.Net, it will help you a lot to get to know SFDC, specifically Html, Javscript, CSS, SQL, and other generic programming skills
This will be a big challenge for folks who want to get into this new area, but don't have programming background. If your English is quite competent, which I don't most folks are in this case, you can try SFDC administrator, SFDC consultant. English is very very very important for this new area, basically you have to deal with business application, co-works from business side. SFDC administrator is a lot different from other technical administrator jobs, like network administator, or DB administator. You have to communicate a lot. Usually the position of SFDC administrator belongs to Sales/Marketing department, not technology department.