最新投资研究报告解读

最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
马老师,什么时候动手屯大宗呀,这个玉米和大豆曲线看得我手痒,呵呵。
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=CORN Basic Chart&t=1y
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SOYB&ql=0
==================================================================
很多砖家都在忽悠你进场吧。
目前实际未到,我都关注半年以上了。
技术面上看一点问题没有,进场信号明显
但是从供需基本面上看,由于国内的收储政策,导致国内期货价格玉米,大豆依然在高位
如果国内的期货价格出现崩盘式下跌,五年十年的低点,基本上技术面和供需面形成共振,获取利润的效率可能会最大化。
个人感觉是国内的库存低于平均水平,加工厂,贸易商在价格低位需要补库存了。棉花,白糖,小麦都是一个样子。
upload_2014-9-4_9-52-3.png

upload_2014-9-4_9-54-0.png
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
欧元自此之后,大概率成为第二个日元,大趋势是欧元兑美元下行,但不能一味看空。汇率是政府希望走弱,对冲基金疯狂借贷,抬升汇率。一有风吹草动,汇率波动加大。银行存钱在央行要收费,酷,世界首例!
ECB Cuts By 10 Bps, Sends Deposit Rate Further Into Negative Territory
While everyone was expecting Mario Draghi to announce ABS purchases, few if any had expected the ECB to also cut rates. Which it just did whacking its corridor rates across the board by 10 bps, in the process sending the Deposit Facility rate even further into negative territory,now down at -0.2%.
From the ECB's monetary policy decision:
At today’s meeting the Governing Council of the ECB took the following monetary policy decisions:
  • The interest rate on the main refinancing operations of the Eurosystem will be decreased by 10 basis points to 0.05%, starting from the operation to be settled on 10 September 2014.
  • The interest rate on the marginal lending facility will be decreased by 10 basis points to 0.30%, with effect from 10 September 2014.
  • The interest rate on the deposit facility will be decreased by 10 basis points to -0.20%, with effect from 10 September 2014.
Here are five questions from Bloomberg for Mario Draghi this morning...
Is more easing on the way?
After the ECB unveiled an unprecedented stimulus package in June, most analysts had expected officials to hold off on new measures until the end of the year. An economy that stalled in the second quarter, slowing inflation and the crisis in Ukraine changed the picture. Draghi acknowledged these developments, and their effect on inflation expectations, in a speech at Jackson Hole, Wyoming on Aug. 22, setting the stage for more stimulus, including quantitative easing.
Will there be changes to the TLTROs?
The ECB may make the terms of its targeted longer-term loans, the centerpiece of its June package, more attractive by cutting its benchmark rate or erasing the premium it plans to charge banks, analysts say. The current plan -- aimed at supporting the recovery by boosting lending -- offers funding at 0.10 percentage point above the benchmark rate. A rate cut would make what is already, according to Draghi, a “very, very attractive” offer even more appealing.
The first round of the TLTRO operation is due this month. Estimates of take-up in a Bloomberg News survey fell in August as the economic outlook for the euro area clouded. Italy’s seven biggest banks will ask to borrow as much as 30.3 billion euros ($40 billion) this month, according to a Bloomberg News report.
What’s happening with inflation?
A key thing to watch for is any change in the inflation wording of Draghi’s opening statement. In August, he said officials see “both upside and downside risks to the outlook for price developments as limited and broadly balanced over the medium term.”
The ECB will also issue new economic forecasts. It currently predicts price growth will gradually accelerate over the next 2 1/2 years, climbing from 0.7 percent this year to 1.1 percent in 2015 and 1.5 percent in the last quarter of 2016.
Inflation, which the ECB aims to keep just under 2 percent, has been below 1 percent since October and fell to 0.3 percent in August, the lowest in almost five years. In Jackson Hole, Draghi reaffirmed that most factors pushing down inflation -- from the exchange rate and geopolitical tensions to food and energy prices -- are temporary. Core inflation edged up in August to 0.9 percent.
Still, the ECB President recognized that “if this period of low inflation were to last for a prolonged period of time the risk to price stability would increase,” and said inflation expectations had “exhibited significant declines.”
Let’s cut to the chase, is quantitative easing coming?
After Draghi’s Jackson Hole speech, when he said the Governing Council “will use all the available instruments needed to ensure price stability over the medium term,” analysts from Berenberg to JPMorgan Chase & Co. said the chances of large-scale asset purchases have increased. While most analysts think QE, if it happens, will come in 2015, Citigroup Inc. economists predicted last month the central bank will unveil a QE program in December valued at 1 trillion euros.
At the same time, the technical, political and legal hurdles to asset purchases remain high, especially if they involve government bonds.
The ECB is also accelerating preparations to buy asset-backed securities. The central bank hired BlackRock Inc., the world’s biggest money manager, to advise on a program with the twin aims of reviving the shrinking European securitization market and providing another liquidity tool. ABS purchases may form part of a larger QE program.
What has Draghi been telling Europe’s leaders?
The ECB President met with France’s Francois Hollande and Italy’s Matteo Renzi in recent weeks and spoke on the phone with German Chancellor Angela Merkel. While such contacts are not news in themselves, they came as France and Italy have called for more flexibility in European Union deficit rules, something Germany opposes.
In Jackson Hole, Draghi also said governments’ “fiscal policy could play a greater role” in supporting euro area’s growth, alongside monetary policy and structural reforms.

New ECB actions were specifically intended to reap benefits through Euro currency devaluation. To achieve this aim, Draghi announced cuts in interest rates as well as administering Euro ‘printing’ through balance sheet expansion (€1,000bln or so). The ECB has had recent success as the EUR/USD dropped over 1.5% today and has fallen 5% since July.
A weaker currency is desirable during periods of recessions and subdued inflation. Doing so, however, is not always seamless or the most ideal policy. Many global central banks, for instance, needed to follow the Fed’s lead in cutting rates after the 2008 crisis or risked having an undesirable appreciation of their home currency. Tensions can periodically arise, because two countries cannot become ‘more competitive’ at the same time (‘a race to the bottom’). Clearly, a weaker currency in one country means a stronger currency in another.
There are times, however, when currency movements are mutually beneficial.
Against the USD, Draghi is maximizing his efforts to weaken the Euro by trying to utilize ideal timing; expanding the ECB balance sheet at precisely the same time that the Fed’s is flat lining. The widening of interest rate differentials also helps. The FOMC likely welcomes today’s actions. Ideally, Draghi would have also wanted a Quid Quo Pro with Italy and France regarding economic reform; this sounds good in theory, but it is not how politics work.
Despite Draghi’s vacant pleas for fiscal ‘arrows’, he had to ‘do his part’, particularly after backing himself into a corner after his Jackson Hole speech. Nonetheless, ECB actions surpassed expectations today. However, this probably means that the bazooka of sovereign QE is off the table for a while. On the other hand, since the ECB’s new forecasts for inflation and real growth are still too optimistic, Draghi might have positioned himself well to use that tool next year if absolutely necessary.
Some believe that actions today were jointly agreed to by the Fed and ECB to allow the stimulus baton to be passed from one major central bank to another. Could this be to help ease the risk-off fallout that is likely to ensue in anticipation of the first Fed hike? Maybe the price action in US equity markets today should serve as an early warning signal.
It is important to note that there are sharp contrasts between the US and Eurozone in terms of economic reality and needed fiscal reforms. These vast contrasts require different fixes and means that central actions to date have been dissimilar and will ultimately have varying results. Put another way, the ECB did not ‘take a page out of the Fed’s playbook’. Current and past actions of the ECB make much more sense than have those of the Fed.
QE3 was always a questionable and debatable policy stance. For some, its continuation in recent months may have even veered toward irresponsibility. Economic data in the US has been steadily improving and some data is the best in almost a decade. It is not hard to argue that the Fed has been completely on the wrong track with its depression-like policy stance; a stance that has encouraged monstrous market speculation and moral hazard euphoria of epic proportions. It has likely resulted in a mammoth surge in obscured financial instability; the risks of which are not tempered in any way by the smoke-screen known as ‘monitoring’ and ‘macro-prudential’ policy.
Moreover, the six years of Zero Interest Rate Policy (ZIRP), has ballooned debt levels; a good portion of which are buried on the Fed’s balance sheet. Shuffling debt chairs doesn’t fix underlying problems, but merely delays the inevitable. As Martin Wolf wrote in the FT, “beyond some point, the growth in debt adds to the fragility of the economy more than it adds to either personal welfare or aggregate demand. Amir Sufi argues this persuasively in his book House of Debt.” There is still failure in understanding the causes of past crises.
Unlike at the Fed, today’s ECB actions must be worrying to the Swiss National Bank (SNB).
The SNB’s 1.2000 floor for EUR/CHF stands diametrically opposed to the devaluation desires of the ECB. With little growth or inflation, the SNB would like to see the CHF weaken. However, there are factors putting upside pressure on the CHF (a safe-haven), including: an attractive interest rate differential to the EU; a 10% current account surplus; and heightened geo-political risks (particularly in Eastern Europe).
How will the SNB manage its peg? It can no longer sell CHF for EUR and invest it in the negative yielding front end of Germany. This is a losing proposition. Will it have to drop the peg? Will it buy USD/CHF and invest the proceeds in Treasuries?
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
高盛强烈看多,不是好兆头啊!
The Bottom Line: Goldman Sachs - who recently explained how the market's "stellar return borrowed heavily from the future" and "is now 30%-45% overvalued compared with the average since 1928" would now once again like you - dear client - to buy these stocks from them because - shockingly - the ECB was dovish... Trade accordingly.
Goldman Flip-Flops Again - Upgrades Stocks, Bunds, & High-Yield Credit
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 09/06/2014 17:15 -0400
Just 2 months ago, the illustrious muppet catchers at Goldman Sachs stated that both stocks were 30-45% overvalued but lifted its year-end target in what we subjectively described as 'moronic drivel'. Then, 2 short weeks after that 'upgrade', the same thought-provoking sell-side strategist downgraded stocks on the basis that a 'sell-off in bonds could lead to short-term weakness in stocks'. Now, with the S&P 500 closing at new record highs on the worst employment data of the year, Goldman is at it again - upgrading equities to overweight for the next 3 months, rolling index targets forward, and piling investors into high-yield credit. Welcome to muppetville...
First - BUY!
What’s changed
We upgrade equities to overweight over 3 months, in line with our 12-month view. We have rolled our index targets forward to higher levels for all regions except Japan and, following the dovish ECB decisions yesterday, we now see the risk to equities from higher bond yields as less imminent. We maintain a high conviction that yields will rise from here, but since our last GOAL, risks have clearly shifted in the direction of a slower path. Today we re-iterated our yield forecast for the US, UK and Japan and lowered our year-end Bund forecast from 1.60% to 1.30%

Our recommended asset allocation
Equities:
We are overweight over both 3 and 12 months. We expect earnings growth, dividends, and high risk premia to support returns.
Commodities:
We are neutral over both 3 and 12 months but expect significant dispersion below the index level. We like nickel, palladium, zinc and aluminium, but see downside for copper and gold. Roll carry is likely to contribute significantly to returns, especially for oil, copper and aluminium.
Corporate credit: We remain underweight over both 3 and 12 months. We expect spreads to narrow, but given already tight levels, rising government bond yields are likely to dominate the returns, especially for US IG credit. The exception is US HY, and within credit we would recommend an overweight in HY relative to IG.
Government bonds: We remain underweight. We expect yields to rise due to sustained high US growth and accelerating inflation, a decline in deflation concerns in Europe, and support to inflation expectations from ECB policy action.

* * *
What's New
This week, we have rolled forward our equity targets for the US, Europe and Asia ex-Japan to higher levels. We have also lowered our forecast for German Bunds from 1.60% to 1.30% by year-end.
We upgrade equities to overweight over 3 months and, within corporate credit, we emphasize an overweight in high yield relative to investment grade from a total return perspective. We balance the upgrade of equities with a downgrade of cash to neutral over 3 months.
On Bonds...
Yesterday’s ECB decisions were more dovish than expected. On the back of this new information, our bond strategists have today lowered their year-end forecast for German bunds to 1.30% while re-iterating their existing year-end forecasts for the US, the UK and Japan. We maintain a high conviction that yields will rise from here, but since our last GOAL, risks have clearly shifted in the direction of a slower path.
Still Underweight credit, but...
In our last GOAL, we downgraded equities to neutral over 3 months and corporate credit to underweight over both 3 and 12 months. In the case of equities, we were concerned about the risk from a rise in bond yields and, to a lesser extent, geopolitical risks that had to be held up against our longer-term very constructive outlook. In corporate credit, we were still constructive on spreads, but this constructive view had to be held up against the losses we expect on the government bond component of the total return. Even with bond risks somewhat lower they still dominate the spread return for IG credit, and we remain underweight corporate credit. For high yield on the other hand, the spread return has the potential to offset any loss on the bond component of the total return. Therefore, on a total return basis, we have a clear preference for HY over IG.
Upgrading Equities...
For equities, our longer-term view is very positive. We expect solid returns for all the major regions, driven mainly by earnings growth and dividends. Reflecting this longer-term view and the passage of time, this week we rolled our equity targets to higher numbers in both the US, Europe and Asia ex-Japan. Given this and the somewhat lower risk we see from bonds, we upgrade equities to overweight over 3 months, in line with our 12-month allocation. The ECB policy action reflects a weaker growth and inflation outlook for the Euro area, which is also a drag on equities. However, we think much of this is already reflected in the data and, on balance, we think the net effect of the policy action from here will be positive for equity markets.
Regional changes...
Over 12 months, we maintain our current regional allocations within equities: overweight Europe and Japan; neutral Asia ex-Japan; and underweight the US. We have less conviction in our regional allocations over 3 months but, on balance, we downgrade Japan to underweight after a strong run in recent months and given current macro headwinds. Longer term, for Japan, we still believe in the ability of reforms to drive profit and performance and that, together with an attractive valuation, is reflected in our overweight stance over 12 months. We upgrade Asia ex-Japan to overweight over 3 months and expect support from the Shanghai-Hong Kong stock connect theme as well as our generally more positive view on EM assets. We upgrade the US to neutral reflecting the current robust US growth environment. Finally, we maintain our overweight in Europe.
And remember - as we noted here - the preferred method for getting long...
So how does one trade an idiotic market in which Fear Of Missing Out (on one's Christmas bonus) is the only "catalyst"?
For stock-pickers, we highlight three strategies with historical precedent that should outperform into year-end:
  1. Stocks with high beta should outperform as the S&P 500 rises modestly in 4Q. In particular, our Dual Beta basket (Bloomberg: GSTHBETA) consists of 50 stocks on a sectorneutral basis with the highest combined sensitivity to the S&P 500 and US economy.
  2. High price momentum stocks that have posted the strongest returns YTD will likely continue to outperform laggards as investors reallocate positioning in an attempt to ride "what's working" into year-end.
  3. The most popular stocks should benefit as funds add incremental length to existing positions they already own and which are already outperforming in 2014. Our Hedge Fund VIP list (GSTHHVIP) and Mutual Fund Overweight list (GSTHMFOW) each identify the 50 stocks most popular among fund managers

The punchline: "investors should buy the following 15 S&P 500 stocks, rated "Buy" by Goldman Sachs Equity Research analysts, which should benefit from a combination of beta, momentum, and popularity as funds attempt to remedy their weak YTD performance heading into late 2014."

Translation: come inside the Hedge Fund hotel Kalifornia: it's nice and warm inside, and superb returns are virtually assured.
* * *
The Bottom Line: Goldman Sachs - who recently explained how the market's "stellar return borrowed heavily from the future" and "is now 30%-45% overvalued compared with the average since 1928" would now once again like you - dear client - to buy these stocks from them because - shockingly - the ECB was dovish... Trade accordingly.
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
嘿嘿。高盛有乌鸦嘴。
在每年的机构投资者的全明星的策略分析师的排名基本进不了前五,未来十年排不到前三名的概率和冲不出亚洲的中国足球水平一样高。
就策略报告而言, 那有单凭ECB货币政策超预期(非趋势性转折),策略就180度急转弯的道理,too naive too simple。

高盛首席外汇策略师、知名“乌鸦嘴”Thomas Stolper近日宣布,将在3月初之前离职,创办一家外汇公司。
Thomas Stolper现年45岁,在高盛任职15年,自2009年成为高盛首席外汇策略师。他还是高盛董事总经理。
正如其外号“乌鸦嘴”一样,Stolper推荐交易中,大量的止损后反转的案例让其声名大噪。他的离开使广大投资者又失去了一个精准的反向指标。ZeroHedge更是表示,Stolper过去5年在其网站上公布的外汇交易策略,如果反向交易的话,已经产生了10000点的收益!
让我们一起来回顾一下Stolper的部分辉煌战绩:
2011年8月初,Stolper预测QE3将至,建议做空美元
实际情况:在不到一年时间里,美元指数自73一线飙升至84一线,最大涨幅达15%。
2012年10月初,Stolper建议买入欧元/澳元,高盛的澳大利亚经济学家Tim Toohey将此称为“世纪最佳交易策略”。
实际情况:尽管此策略在长线上看是正确的,但是在Stolper此言出后一个月,欧/澳便由1.281跌至1.215,跌幅达5%,不知高盛扛住了没有。
2013年3月初,Stolper建议做多欧元/英镑
实际情况:不到一个月时间,欧/镑自0.87跌至0.84,Stolper被迫平仓,自称亏损2.8%,当然,别忘了乘以10倍杠杆。
2013年3月底,Stolper建议卖出欧元/美元。
实际情况:在后来的7个月里,欧元从当时的1.29一路狂飙至1.38一线,涨幅达6.9%。
2013年7月初,Stolper推荐在当前1.3060的水平上,做多欧元,开始的目标价为1.35,止损价为1.28。
实际情况:不到两天欧元/美元就跌破了其推荐的止损位。
2013年10月初,Stolper推荐在目前97.3元的价位做空美元/日元,目标价位94.00元,止损位98.80元。
实际情况:美/日没过两周便到了止损位,随后一路飚升至105.4的5年来高位。高盛因做多日元巨亏10亿美元。
2013年11月底,Stolper建议做多美/加,称其未来12个月内升至1.14,建议止损设在1.01下方。
实际情况:就目前看来这个建议是最靠谱的,美/加由当时的1.058随后升至1.12附近,涨幅达到5.8%。
再提一句,他目前仍然看多欧元/美元半年内升至1.40美元。继续与大多数分析师的预测相左。
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
阿里上市,高管一级市场直接出售1.97亿股,即使180天后解禁,二级市场股票套现的压力也极小,这点远不同于国内A股。
同时有30天的绿鞋配售机制,投行68进,93出有4800万股,爽翻天了。


凤凰科技讯 9月20日消息,阿里巴巴北京时间昨日晚间登陆纽交所,股票代码BABA,收盘价报93.89美元,较发行价上涨38.07%,市值2314.39亿美元。
阿里昨开盘报92.7美元,较发行价上涨36.3%,一路飙升至99.46美元,但股价随后走低。按照目前的市值,阿里已成为仅次于谷歌的全球第二大互联网公司。
据了解,阿里发行价为68美元,以此价格计算,此次IPO将募集资金218亿美元,超越Visa上市所创造的197亿美元的融资额记录,成为美股最大规模IPO,如果承销商行使超额配售权,阿里巴巴融资额将达到250亿美元,超越农行A+H股上市时所创造的221亿美元的融资记录,成为全球最大规模IPO。
根据招股书显示,阿里巴巴此次IPO将发行3.2亿股美国存托股票(ADS),其中新股1.23亿股;同时,包括主要股东雅虎以及阿里巴巴集团董事局主席马云和执行副董事长蔡崇信在内的献售股东将提供总计为1.97亿股。此外阿里巴巴还启动了绿鞋机制,承销商有权要求阿里巴巴增发最多15%的ADS,即4800万股,承销商可在阿里巴巴上市后30天内行使此权限。
在IPO交易中,阿里巴巴集团创始人马云和执行副董事长蔡崇信都将出售部分持股,交易完成后马云仍将是该集团的第三大股东及最大个人股东,持股量为7.8%,蔡崇信也仍将持有其3.2%的股份。根据协议,雅虎将出售阿里巴巴总股份的4.9%,套现83亿美元,此外,该集团最大股东软银不会在IPO交易中出售股份,交易完成后的持股比例稀释为32.4%。
阿里巴巴集团IPO交易的承销商为瑞士信贷集团、德意志银行、高盛集团、摩根大通和摩根士丹利,此外,花旗集团也将经手这项交易。预计各大承销商总共将可获得IPO收入的1%作为基本承销费,也就是很可能超过2亿美元;此外,承销商还将另外获得1%作为激励费。
Dealogics的数据显示,迄今为止,在美上市的科技或互联网公司的IPO中,平均一日的股价升幅是26%,这个数字在各行业公司的IPO中是13%,以全年平均增幅来计,前者是26%,后者是14%。
金融时报》的Lex专栏曾提到关于阿里巴巴市盈率的预测:截至2015年3月的这个财年,如果阿里的收入增幅是上个财年的一半——50%,其市盈率则为25倍。再看阿里的“同行们”:百度的增长预期是40%,其市盈率为26倍,Facebook市盈率为38倍,其收入增长预期是25%,eBay的增长预期则仅为14%,其市盈率为16倍。
在阿里赴美上市前,在美股市场进行的IPO已经于2000年来在数量和金额上均保持了最快的增长速度。
现在还未知阿里巴巴逾4800万的超额配售股份是否全数认购完毕,若是如此,阿里IPO的融资额将达250亿美元,不仅仅成为美国史上最大的IPO,也将超越中国农业银行IPO时220亿美元的融资额,成为全球史上最大规模的IPO。
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
美联储加息箭在弦上,不得不开弓了,继续宽松的空间已经很窄很窄了。
图示150年全球央行利率演变史

文 / 若离 2014年09月22日 11:23:40 2
近两年不谋而合大宽松的全球主要央行走上了三岔路:欧洲央行的负利率一降再降,日本央行的超级双料QE根本没有停手的迹象,而美联储还在按每月减少购买150亿美元资产的速度继续缩减QE。
正如全球最大债券基金之一PIMCO的前任CEO Mohamed El-Erian上周评论,发达国家的货币政策正在由一致行动的单轨系统转入多轨系统,这将是第四季度深度影响全球经济多个领域的一大因素。
如底部高盛图表所示。回顾19世纪中叶以来的历史可以发现,主要央行的货币政策无不受到突发市场事件和经济环境的影响。
以美国为例,但凡经济萧条或是大银行倒闭引起金融恐慌、世界大战后陷入经济萧条,美国的政策利率都会直线下滑。进入21世纪,“9·11”恐怖袭击和科技网络泡沫破灭也是美联储降息的推手。
从这个角度看,即使主要央行现在有的保持宽松的现状、有的继续发力、有的开始逐步为退出宽松铺路,也难保未来不会因为经济形势恶化或者突发的市场冲击,而继续踩着宽松的油门不放。(更多精彩财经资讯,点击这里下载华尔街见闻App)
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
新浪财经讯 北京时间10月4日凌晨消息,阿里巴巴(88.1, 1.04, 1.19%)(BABA)周五刚向美国证交会(SEC)提交文件称,据多项员工激励计划,公司注册的在外流通股将多出6592万余股。据阿里股票周四收盘价和文件列举的行权价计算,若当天售股阿里员工将因此税前获益41.6亿元人民币。
  阿里的这份S-8证管文件显示,多出的6592万3230股股票的来源有三大部分:2011年期权计划,1999年以来激励计划(不包括第一部分)转化为2014年计划的部分,以及2014年IPO后激励计划,其中第三部分所占的比例最大,达4894万4243股。
  从加权平均算得的行权价计算,第一部分的行权价最低,仅为31.70美元/股,第二部分达到48.89美元/股,而第三部分高达86.91美元/股,与阿里目前的股价相差无几。
  这些股份的累积行权总值为50.6亿余美元,而6592万3230股阿里股票依据周四收盘价计算价值约57.4亿美元,差值约6.77亿美元,即阿里员工将因为行权而获得约41.6亿元人民币的税前收益。
  阿里今年9月19日在纽交所上市,总筹资额达250亿美元左右,是世界证券史上规模最大的IPO。(立悟/编译)
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
美联储将公布衡量就业质量的新指标LMCI,加拿大也有类似的新指标。
美联储将在下周一(10月6日)北京时间22:00公布一个新的月度就业数据——就业市场状况指数(LMCI)。美银美林(Bank of America Merrill Lynch)周六(10月4日)在向客户提供的报告中就LMCI的构成和使用方法进行了分析。内容如下:
什么是LMCI?
就业市场状况指数(LMCI)是美联储基于19该指标综合而成的一个模型。其中,失业率和非农私企就业人口数据的权重很高,但该模型也同时考虑了其他因素,例如JOLTS职位空缺、兼职人口。该指数公布的是一个变化值,而非水平值。
LMCI为就业市场的健康程度提供了一个综合性的描述,剔除了个别追迹指标的杂音。考虑到美联储强调其将更多地参考系列就业市场数据,我们认为该指数能够在市场上获得更高的关注度。
从4月起,美联储就在内测就业市场状况指数(LMCI)。

(LMCI和非农私企就业人口 来源:美银美林)
如何解读LMCI?
从4月公布的数据来看,LMCI自年初起持续徘徊在4附近。自2009年7月起,该数据转为正值。自有统计以来的均值是4.9,这表明近期的数据有所下降。
从一元回归角度分析,非农私企就业人口数据能够解释63%的LMCI。比如,4月公布的LMCI是6.3,通过回归计算,等同于非农私企就业人口增加27.5万人;这与实际公布的27.8万人已经十分接近了。从4月来就业市场的趋势来看,我们预计下周公布的LMCI在5左右。
通过本行的计算,当非农私企就业人口增加30万人时,对应的LMCI指数应该在7左右。如果LMCI能够达到这一水平,意味着就业市场出现了一个很有意义的上行动能信号。
 
最大赞力
0.00
当前赞力
100.00%
明面上的耶伦主席和副主席不会说措辞很明显的话,纽约联储主席杜德利的话可以称为措辞明显的话。
2015年加息仍将是利大于弊的。
纽约时段,美联储两位官员对加息与否争论不休。美联储理事柯薛拉柯塔在一次公开讲话中指出,2015年并非一个合适的加息时间。如果美联储启动加息周期,必须匹配2%的通胀目标。宽松的货币政策并未抵消经济衰退产生的遗留影响,到2015年若通胀仍低于2%,美联储就不该加息。
  而另一位美联储官员,杜德利和柯薛拉柯塔的讲话基调截然相反。杜德利指出,即便可能引起金融市场的剧烈反应,2015年加息仍将是利大于弊的。加息是好消息,即便市场会受到一些影响,美国政策取决于经济数据。在开启加息周期时,美联储有工具可维持经济可控。
 

Similar threads

家园推荐黄页

家园币系统数据

家园币池子报价
家园币最新成交价
家园币总发行量
加元现金总量
家园币总成交量
家园币总成交价值

池子家园币总量
池子加元现金总量
池子币总量
1池子币现价
池子家园币总手续费
池子加元总手续费
入池家园币年化收益率
入池加元年化收益率

微比特币最新报价
毫以太币最新报价
微比特币总量
毫以太币总量
家园币储备总净值
家园币比特币储备
家园币以太币储备
比特币的加元报价
以太币的加元报价
USDT的加元报价

交易币种/月度交易量
家园币
加元交易对(比特币等)
USDT交易对(比特币等)
顶部