新版性教育大纲居心叵测。比如提到同性恋，大纲里提到了HIV，也就是艾滋病，接下来就告诉你艾滋病是可以治疗的，有人经过治疗可以和正常人一样生活，但是大纲里没有提到同性恋人群中艾滋病的发病率和死亡率，关于艾滋病的负面消息一点也没有，这不等于是间接怂恿吗?
[评论]华裔愤怒：我们受过高等教育 反对肛交
- 主题发起人 melodygardon
- 发布时间 2015-03-28
新版性教育大纲居心叵测。比如提到同性恋，大纲里提到了HIV，也就是艾滋病，接下来就告诉你艾滋病是可以治疗的，有人经过治疗可以和正常人一样生活，但是大纲里没有提到同性恋人群中艾滋病的发病率和死亡率，关于艾滋病的负面消息一点也没有，这不等于是间接怂恿吗?
你英语什么程度，看了原文了吗？是不是看见了肛交，口交这些词，孩子就被教会了。
After reading through both 1998 and 2015 version curriculum, I actually think 2015 version is really much worse than 1998 version for below reasons:
1. Parents are out of picture in the new curriculum made in 2015, while they are premier educators in 1998 version;
2. 2105 version promotes kids to ask doctors and role module for reference. I think parents know the kids better and should be the first counseling resources;
3. 2015 version promote that sex is pleasure to have and is kind of promoting kids to have sex, unless they have specific reason to delay it;
4. In 2015 version, it doesn’t mention self-control, moral, marriage, family, responsibility, just pleasure and relationship. What kind of education is this? Sex is not a game that everyone can play and leave so easily. It is so misleading and so wrong!
5. In 2015 version, it exposes too much detailed info about sex, pregnancy, homosexual, six gender IDs, oral/anal sex to the children at too early stage! They know and they could try, even before they are fully aware of it. Grade 8 is only 14 years old. Why you want to expose so much detailed sex-related information to them? What’s the intention here?
6. New version emphasizes that the more you know, the better decision you can make. It also suggest students to make a plan and stick with it. What plan we are talking about here at such young age? It is really a joke here! At Grade 1 to 8, children will be taught a lot of misleading information, which could lead them to make mistake before they are really ready to tell right and wrong! This is like washing kids’ brain by pouring in all info, doesn’t matter right or wrong, and ask them to choose by themselves, with NO involvement from parents. I can’t help myself to ask, what are you doing here? What’s the purpose behind the scene?
7. The example list in the new curriculum is too specific. Our kids are not industrialized machines. They are individuals that parents know the best for when and how to talk with them about sex. We don’t want so-called professional teachers to teach them this so sensitive and private topic in public and in too early-age. What will be taught could be totally against our tradition and family value. For example, why it is suggest someone to bring condom if he/she feel to have sex and just consult the doctor, instead of control themselves and talking with parents? This is so ridiculous!
8.Actually, it also makes me feel that it is promoting some wrong concept to kids. My feeling in general is that a lot of items are really not appropriate and I really suspect the relations between this misleading info and our former duty education-minister, who pleaded guilty for children pornography recently.
Even though we need an updated curriculum, we need a good and proper one, not the one with so much improper information, participated by criminals and without consulting parents.
I guarantee you that most parents will be outraged after they carefully read through new 2015 version curriculum. You already heard this on Tuesday night!!! Last night, our Premier also heard parents’ shouting voice at Mississauga!
1. Parents are out of picture in the new curriculum made in 2015, while they are premier educators in 1998 version;
2. 2105 version promotes kids to ask doctors and role module for reference. I think parents know the kids better and should be the first counseling resources;
3. 2015 version promote that sex is pleasure to have and is kind of promoting kids to have sex, unless they have specific reason to delay it;
4. In 2015 version, it doesn’t mention self-control, moral, marriage, family, responsibility, just pleasure and relationship. What kind of education is this? Sex is not a game that everyone can play and leave so easily. It is so misleading and so wrong!
5. In 2015 version, it exposes too much detailed info about sex, pregnancy, homosexual, six gender IDs, oral/anal sex to the children at too early stage! They know and they could try, even before they are fully aware of it. Grade 8 is only 14 years old. Why you want to expose so much detailed sex-related information to them? What’s the intention here?
6. New version emphasizes that the more you know, the better decision you can make. It also suggest students to make a plan and stick with it. What plan we are talking about here at such young age? It is really a joke here! At Grade 1 to 8, children will be taught a lot of misleading information, which could lead them to make mistake before they are really ready to tell right and wrong! This is like washing kids’ brain by pouring in all info, doesn’t matter right or wrong, and ask them to choose by themselves, with NO involvement from parents. I can’t help myself to ask, what are you doing here? What’s the purpose behind the scene?
7. The example list in the new curriculum is too specific. Our kids are not industrialized machines. They are individuals that parents know the best for when and how to talk with them about sex. We don’t want so-called professional teachers to teach them this so sensitive and private topic in public and in too early-age. What will be taught could be totally against our tradition and family value. For example, why it is suggest someone to bring condom if he/she feel to have sex and just consult the doctor, instead of control themselves and talking with parents? This is so ridiculous!
8.Actually, it also makes me feel that it is promoting some wrong concept to kids. My feeling in general is that a lot of items are really not appropriate and I really suspect the relations between this misleading info and our former duty education-minister, who pleaded guilty for children pornography recently.
Even though we need an updated curriculum, we need a good and proper one, not the one with so much improper information, participated by criminals and without consulting parents.
I guarantee you that most parents will be outraged after they carefully read through new 2015 version curriculum. You already heard this on Tuesday night!!! Last night, our Premier also heard parents’ shouting voice at Mississauga!
这么简单的事，自己看看原文。看那么多二手资料干什么，包括英文二手资料。
那你看艾滋病那块了吗？
二手资料对某群体好用是因为有些人只相信邻居大妈。不会自己阅读思考。
Parents should be the primary educators for our children. We teach sexuality based on their moral maturity level. Sex should be taught after love, responsibility, family values have been emphasized. Not to be separated as a physical source of pleasure
加拿大 美国立国时候的很多清教徒优秀的品质（当然有另一面），正在加速流逝。。当装B的氛围成为一种政治正确的时候，这个国家的衰败是可以预见的
还是中国古话说得好，乐而不淫。 不要以为自己多人性，多开放的视野，这些都是人类历史上玩剩下的。 巴比伦王朝鼎盛的时期，乱伦还是一种风尚呢。 现在这些算鸡毛啊。骂别人封闭，自我感觉解放思想。 纯粹扯淡，解放思想首先是的有思想，否则解放的都是欲望。 跟畜生一样，一切以欲望为导向。
这个题目很搞笑，应该改成“我们没受过高等教育，反对XX”才对 。
性教育开放些好，性行为保守些好，实际上，越是观念开放，对待性需求就越是理性和高标准，原始的动物性就被消解的越彻底，这个道理，估计很多受过“高等教育”的人还看不懂。
性教育开放些好，性行为保守些好，实际上，越是观念开放，对待性需求就越是理性和高标准，原始的动物性就被消解的越彻底，这个道理，估计很多受过“高等教育”的人还看不懂。
deepbluehan
waiting...
请问你看了原文吗，请问你有孩子吗
新版性教育大纲居心叵测。比如提到同性恋，大纲里提到了HIV，也就是艾滋病，接下来就告诉你艾滋病是可以治疗的，有人经过治疗可以和正常人一样生活，但是大纲里没有提到同性恋人群中艾滋病的发病率和死亡率，关于艾滋病的负面消息一点也没有，这不等于是间接怂恿吗?
新大纲里对12岁儿童提及的成人化内容时，只是提双方同意，并不提18岁以下该行为是违反加拿大刑法的任何内容。连法律都不顾及了，真是自由得可以。
最后编辑: 2015-03-30
1，既然你有3个小孩，请问你几岁开始了解肛交和搞基？！
2，肛交要从娃娃抓起吗？搞基要从娃娃抓起吗？
注册或登录来发表评论
您必须是注册会员才可以发表评论
注册帐号
注册帐号. 太容易了!
登录
已有帐号? 在这里登录.
