当小猫还在刷手机的时候，中国已经全面开启刷脸。

[考拉不是熊]

你指的是北美的拥枪自由？

我指的是中国买菜刀。

 

[一庐春秋]

几胞胎的脸一样

造假币的可以改行造假脸

听说有人苹果10读脸识别总失败退货，这要是有急事刷不出来脸。。。

人老了脸也会变，要定期更新？

 

[考拉不是熊]

几胞胎的脸一样

造假币的可以改行造假脸

听说有人苹果10读脸识别总失败退货

有时候科技的高速发展并不一定是好事，以前拿大刀片子砍，现在直接丢原子弹，人类灭亡的速度也在加快。

 

[一庐春秋]

有时候科技的高速发展并不一定是好事，以前拿大刀片子砍，现在直接丢原子弹，人类灭亡的速度也在加快。

如果大家一起走，是不是恐惧会减弱？不会有太多的不甘吧

 

[考拉不是熊]

如果大家一起走，是不是恐惧会减弱？

人对于死亡的恐惧在于留恋，留恋身边值得自己珍惜的东西，如果都没了，那么这条生命也就没有轻重了，生无可恋是不是就是这层意思？

 

[一庐春秋]

人对于死亡的恐惧在于留恋，留恋身边值得自己珍惜的东西，如果都没了，那么这条生命也就没有轻重了，生无可恋是不是就是这层意思？

赞同！恐惧可能还包含了对未知未来的不确定？虽然有人信没有来世，但万一有呢

 

[asdfg12345678]

现在国内生活非常方便。我经常app上点个外卖，半个多小时就送过来了，非常方便。
老移民多回来看看，不要跟着5分轮子瞎起哄。

 

[starry starry night]

美国发明这类技术。结果是这类技术太符合中国的需要了。

 

[frigyda]

用照片刷脸？笑死我了……
照片会点头摇头会眨眼吗？
嗯，学小和尚的，不说破

 

[frigyda]

几胞胎的脸一样

造假币的可以改行造假脸

听说有人苹果10读脸识别总失败退货，这要是有急事刷不出来脸。。。

人老了脸也会变，要定期更新？

身份证的有效期10年20年，到期后也需要更新身份证的照片

 

[sabre的马甲]

几胞胎的脸一样

造假币的可以改行造假脸

听说有人苹果10读脸识别总失败退货，这要是有急事刷不出来脸。。。

人老了脸也会变，要定期更新？

这个有办法， 瞳孔， 据说瞳孔比指纹的鉴别能力还厉害，

 

[frigyda]

现在国内生活非常方便。我经常app上点个外卖，半个多小时就送过来了，非常方便。
老移民多回来看看，不要跟着5分轮子瞎起哄。

何止点外卖，去餐馆吃饭，点菜买单都靠扫一扫。除了厨师和上菜的服务员，其他都可以失业了

离开国内不过一年，回去还真有点蒙圈

 

[dennistan2009]

有些人脸识别不出来的，比如有些女的，学生时代很逻辑化，很理性，找对象了又变得女人一点了，
整个脸型气质肤色表情都不一样的。

 

[catorclie]

我还是书归正传，不调侃和尚了。真正的FACE ID 从设计到安全考虑的平衡说明。 以现在的新 IPHONE X 设计为例。

没有谁现在真会认为用照片儿就能刷脸。三星最开始的“刷脸”简陋技术就是用照片儿骗过了，然后现在的技术改进才有了新的技术成果， 但还是有技术上的质疑。如下面的TED Presentation 讲述的那样。我一直在关注和学习这些新技术的研究和应用，但不是中国那些应用级别的研究， 不在一个讨论范畴里。


The aspect of the technology that will be of most interest to biometric professionals will be the abilities of the new 3D depth camera (TrueDepth). This system appears to work like the Microsoft Kinect, by projecting an infrared pattern in order to measure the 3D face structure. The extra level of security this will provide to the face recognition unlock feature will depend on the depth accuracy. I'd have to say that is currently questionable. It is also the case that infrared is directly affected by sunlight, so it will be interesting to see how the feature works in an outside setting.

In particular, there are a range of security concerns that need to be addressed. The claim during the presentation was that the accuracy comparison (the chance of someone else being able to access your phone) from TouchID was 1:50,000 and 1:1,000,000 for FaceID. This is a substantial claim that I suspect will soon turn out to be a significant overstatement. As a start, your face is not a private commodity (unlike your fingerprints). A high-resolution photograph of most people’s faces can be easily found online.

Just like the fingerprint technology, I predict it won’t take long for the FaceID to be hacked. The significant difference being that most people don't have their fingerprint images online. The techniques for producing fake fingerprints are also more involved than those need to produce fake facial images.

TouchID is currently relied on to manage security risks across a wide range of applications. Despite some vulnerability concerns in practice, TouchID has provided a good security model without the need for additional risk management. This is likely not to be the case with the new FaceID. Application developers and users will need to be aware of the increased security risks.

Two issues briefly covered at the launch were the vulnerability to masks (the claim is that FaceID can detect these, but from the work that Biometix has done we know this is a very hard to solve) and for people that look similar (for example, that ‘share a genetic relationship’). I expect these issues will get a lot of coverage once people start using the new iPhone X.

On a related note, there is a serious security vulnerability facing many government departments using facial biometrics, known as morphing attacks. This is where two face images from different people are merged together to produce an image that can be used to recognize either person. Biometix is releasing a free morph testing set in the coming days to allow researchers and users to test their systems’ vulnerability to this type of attack.

Please be in contact with Biometix for more information (www.biometix.com).

• Sign in to like this article
  
  
• Sign in to comment on this article
  
  
• Share
  

 

[yyddss]

我还是书归正传，不调侃和尚了。真正的FACE ID 从设计到安全考虑的平衡说明。 以现在的新 IPHONE X 设计为例。

没有谁现在真会认为用照片儿就能刷脸。三星最开始的“刷脸”简陋技术就是用照片儿骗过了，然后现在的技术改进才有了新的技术成果， 但还是有技术上的质疑。如下面的TED Presentation 讲述的那样。我一直在关注和学习这些新技术的研究和应用，但不是中国那些应用级别的研究， 不在一个讨论范畴里。


The aspect of the technology that will be of most interest to biometric professionals will be the abilities of the new 3D depth camera (TrueDepth). This system appears to work like the Microsoft Kinect, by projecting an infrared pattern in order to measure the 3D face structure. The extra level of security this will provide to the face recognition unlock feature will depend on the depth accuracy. I'd have to say that is currently questionable. It is also the case that infrared is directly affected by sunlight, so it will be interesting to see how the feature works in an outside setting.

In particular, there are a range of security concerns that need to be addressed. The claim during the presentation was that the accuracy comparison (the chance of someone else being able to access your phone) from TouchID was 1:50,000 and 1:1,000,000 for FaceID. This is a substantial claim that I suspect will soon turn out to be a significant overstatement. As a start, your face is not a private commodity (unlike your fingerprints). A high-resolution photograph of most people’s faces can be easily found online.

Just like the fingerprint technology, I predict it won’t take long for the FaceID to be hacked. The significant difference being that most people don't have their fingerprint images online. The techniques for producing fake fingerprints are also more involved than those need to produce fake facial images.

TouchID is currently relied on to manage security risks across a wide range of applications. Despite some vulnerability concerns in practice, TouchID has provided a good security model without the need for additional risk management. This is likely not to be the case with the new FaceID. Application developers and users will need to be aware of the increased security risks.

Two issues briefly covered at the launch were the vulnerability to masks (the claim is that FaceID can detect these, but from the work that Biometix has done we know this is a very hard to solve) and for people that look similar (for example, that ‘share a genetic relationship’). I expect these issues will get a lot of coverage once people start using the new iPhone X.

On a related note, there is a serious security vulnerability facing many government departments using facial biometrics, known as morphing attacks. This is where two face images from different people are merged together to produce an image that can be used to recognize either person. Biometix is releasing a free morph testing set in the coming days to allow researchers and users to test their systems’ vulnerability to this type of attack.

Please be in contact with Biometix for more information (www.biometix.com).

• Sign in to like this article
  
  
• Sign in to comment on this article
  
  
• Share

有趣。我前一阵刚好看到有人说指纹也会随着衰老变，但变化很慢改变也小多了。

 

[catorclie]

有趣。我前一阵刚好看到有人说指纹也会随着衰老变，但变化很慢也小多了。

是啊。所以我还是觉得生物芯片的出生时一次性植入，作为唯一且不能更换（一取出来人就死亡）的一生的唯一记录，比较能够真正实现技术等级上的真实识别。

但是这样，一切都在Big Brother watching 下了。而这个系统，也还是由人控制，所以终极公正的意义并不存在。

技术一直就是在矛盾和迷惑中摸索前进的，和人类的其它创新一样。这里面最重要的，是设计思想和理念，而不是拿来理念后的简单粗暴应用。在这方面，我不得不说，没有技术积累和踏实研究的态度，进展会相当慢。

 

[yyddss]

是啊。所以我还是觉得生物芯片的出生时一次性植入，作为唯一且不能更换（一取出来人就死亡）的一生的唯一记录，比较能够真正实现技术等级上的真实识别。

但是这样，一切都在Big Brother watching 下了。而这个系统，也还是由人控制，所以终极公正的意义并不存在。

技术一直就是在矛盾和迷惑中摸索前进的，和人类的其它创新一样。这里面最重要的，是设计思想和理念，而不是拿来理念后的简单粗暴应用。在这方面，我不得不说，没有技术积累和踏实研究的态度，进展会相当慢。

真正的科技创新，还是需要有雄厚的经济实力，支撑得起你说的“进展缓慢”。

题外话我注意到加拿大的一些民用科技创新，复杂一点的技术出自研发者本身经济基础就不错，技术相对成熟后通过上市解决前期的投入和后面的推进。小科技有类似众筹的平台。

 

[dennistan2009]

真正的科技创新，还是需要有雄厚的经济实力，支撑得起你说的“进展缓慢”。

题外话我注意到加拿大的一些民用科技创新，复杂一点的技术出自研发者本身经济基础就不错，技术相对成熟后通过上市解决前期的投入和后面的推进。小科技有类似众筹的平台。

一句话，贫穷限制了我的想象力。

 

[yyddss]

一句话，贫穷限制了我的想象力。

那些众筹平台上都是没钱的年轻人啊，保不齐就能从草根升华了

 

[未尝不可]

技术不难，就看用还是不用。
马云的刷脸DNA采集入库一步完成，哈哈。