- 最大赞力
- 0.06
- 当前赞力
- 100.00%
联邦最高院判PA州务卿大选前颁布的选举法令违宪;看懂咋回事了,
(ORDER LIST: 592 U.S.) TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2020 ORDER IN PENDING CASE 20A98 KELLY, MIKE, ET AL. V. PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL. The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied
《ZT》
He didn't deny the "challenge". He denied the plaintiff's emergency injunction request.
The case is alive and pending. It'll likely be merged.
Mark Levin is right, journalists are too stupid or too lazy to understand what is going on
《ZT》
An injunctive relief is only granted if there are no other legal options available.Certification is only the beginning of the litigation process. So the decision was expected and is meaningless.Texas suit is the game changer.
总体来说,人大教授应该是属于改革精英派,美式教育成长,亲美派。总体呼吁的是中国要开放要遵守规则中美要和好继续友好往来,个人作风比较西化,谈笑风生,这种风格在人大到美国中长期留过学进修过的经济系的教授里面经常可以看到,爱在早午茶桌上谈论工作,比较典型的资产阶级自由化的形象。坏处是过于开放,忘记了组织纪律,忘记了自律,越讲越精彩直至爆料。 可惜了,花那么大力气培养的一个人才。两种可能,1卧底 ,2 得意忘形
翟东升会不会是卧底啊
翟东升在11/28讲话,我们上面有人,在美国掀起风浪, 上Fox News, 川普转推,现在全世界都知道了, 在这个节骨眼上,说这种话,无意是给川普助攻 前两天,我有个突然感觉,他是不是故意的,,, 刚才看到翟东升在2019的一段视频,也许真有可能。。。 :) 翟东升2019年谈美帝和川普。比那些假专家,叼盘,利益者看问题透彻多了。 不过他说的这些,很多人都知道,包括我们上面有人, 但是由他嘴里说出来,意义就不一样的,forum.iask.ca
这个 controversy among the states费解,本来就是各行其事,electoral college 的winner take all 都不是所有州都一样,路易斯安那州也加入了,
看看路易斯安那州 AG咋说的
"Only the U.S. Supreme Court can ultimately decide cases of real controversy among the states under our Constitution. That is why the Justices should hear and decide the case which we have joined..."
购买了1250川普币