其他住户的厕所漏水把我们房客的地毯弄湿了，物业派人到屋内查看情况，下周维修的费用会出来。物业说我们屋主要和错误那一方联系赔偿。我想请问可以让物业出面直接把账单直接交给对方吗？ 因为这公寓是出租的，我一天没住过，也没有漏水那一家的联系方式，我询问对方有没有保险物业说也不清楚。这样要如何处理呀？？我以前租公寓住淹了楼下的地毯，物业就给我账单让我清洁地毯这样。
- 主题发起人 dolphan
- 发布时间 2021-01-03
怎么确定是哪家厕所漏水的？有证据吗？
有 已确定是对方的错。并且影响到lobby
我只是想知道物业可否会帮忙协商，联系
因为知道有的物业就会直接bill给负责任的一方。但是好像也听说过不管的
我只是想知道物业可否会帮忙协商，联系
因为知道有的物业就会直接bill给负责任的一方。但是好像也听说过不管的
维修费用是多少？strata的deductible是多少？如果维修费用没超过strata的deductible，让strata 直接把Bill给source unit。如果超了，就让strata open claim，Bill back deductible to source unit。如果不行，你有保险的话，请保险公司通过subrogation与source unit交涉，如果没有保险可能难度会大一点。
维修费估价还未出来
strata的deductible是5w, 虽然有漏到lobby 但是超的可能性不大。
大楼manager写信和我说屋主应该和涉事屋主联系赔偿，就是他们不参与的意思。我以为这应该由物业直接出面bill给涉事单位才对。因为lobby肯定也是找人修，那就一起把账单bill给涉事单位最简单吗。
我们是有保险，联系了保险经纪他们说要是屋内电器，租金什么的没有损失就不用报保险，让我们先联系物业。 要是对方真的不处理再open case什么的，怕对我们保险有影响。
．
网上的文章供参考
ZT
You are the owner of a condo unit. The toilet in the condo unit above you overflows, causing water damage to your ceiling and floor. No, your upstairs neighbour does not have to reimburse you for your $1,000 insurance policy deductible, unless you can prove he was negligent.
It can be surprising and upsetting for owners to learn that they are responsible for the cost of repairs to their strata lot even though the source of the damage originated in someone else’s strata lot,” the B.C. Civil Resolution Tribunal ruled Wednesday in Zale et al v. Hodgins. “However, in the absence of negligence, nuisance or a specific bylaw making owners liable for damage that originates in their strata lots, the applicants and their insurer are responsible for the cost of the damage even though they did nothing to cause it.”
网上的文章供参考
ZT
You are the owner of a condo unit. The toilet in the condo unit above you overflows, causing water damage to your ceiling and floor. No, your upstairs neighbour does not have to reimburse you for your $1,000 insurance policy deductible, unless you can prove he was negligent.
It can be surprising and upsetting for owners to learn that they are responsible for the cost of repairs to their strata lot even though the source of the damage originated in someone else’s strata lot,” the B.C. Civil Resolution Tribunal ruled Wednesday in Zale et al v. Hodgins. “However, in the absence of negligence, nuisance or a specific bylaw making owners liable for damage that originates in their strata lots, the applicants and their insurer are responsible for the cost of the damage even though they did nothing to cause it.”
公寓都有管理经纪公司，可以跟他们联系一下，他们会负责联系相关人员的。
我觉得更应该关心谁负担修漏水的账单吧？
地毯清洁费或者买个新的也不贵。
房子漏水的维修保险不应该管么？
都有垫底费的 物业说没超都是自付再去找涉事方赔偿。
我以前租屋住，淹了楼下地毯，清洁完物业直接给我账单，楼下也无需先自付。
他漏到lobby维修费肯定是他付
若没有到垫底费 影响到我房子里面的费用是我付 再找对方要钱
先毁的地毯拍照留证。
如果必须洗，那就洗了，把账单扫描留底找物业沟通，让物业给楼上，如果物业不帮忙就只好自己把账单给他们要钱。
今天已和物业沟通过，说不归他们管，要自行处理，晚点会把对方联系方式给我们，日后若有需要就去上法庭
我个人觉得分两种情况，说错了请给予指教：
1，对方有过失，negligent，那么可以找对方索赔。
2，对方没有过失，not negligent，那么你只能走你自己的保险。对方无责任。
ZT
You are the owner of a condo unit. The toilet in the condo unit above you overflows, causing water damage to your ceiling and floor. No, your upstairs neighbour does not have to reimburse you for your $1,000 insurance policy deductible, unless you can prove he was negligent.
已确定对方是有责任的
这种赖账不付的事情大楼经理说很多
是的，我一开始就觉得这事容易扯皮。厕所漏水的位置一定是要在对方的居住空间之内漏，才由他负责，如果是墙体内漏，就由物业负责，这事讲不清就要上法庭，可费用不菲，搞不好修理费还不如法律费多。看来物业不管，想是没想跟他要钱修lobby。
到时候再说，第一因为刚发生还没知道最后要花多少钱，第二不知道对方会不会赖账不付。要是不付只能走法律途径了
Similar threads
- 7.20 超赞 赏
- yuandongbin
- 2020-11-25
- 温哥华
2020-11-27有新回复
全楼:7.33
wangsanjiu
