言论自由和谎言复读

骂彭斯干什么?
难道彭斯打开信封闭着眼睛念川普306票,川普就能连任总统了?
只能怪川粉太幼稚了,这也能怪彭斯,简直是胡闹,推特看多了的确会变得黑白不分
首先自己要对选情有个判断,要不是疫情,川普碾压老年痴呆,可事实是疫情让很多人恐慌了,不敢去投票的人怎么会选对疫情藐视的人当总统呢?既然能判断拜登赢,那么对于系统性作弊的怀疑就不会走火入魔地怀疑了。
 
首先自己要对选情有个判断,要不是疫情,川普碾压老年痴呆,可事实是疫情让很多人恐慌了,不敢去投票的人怎么会选对疫情藐视的人当总统呢?既然能判断拜登赢,那么对于系统性作弊的怀疑就不会走火入魔地怀疑了。
防疫是川普的硬伤,美国的疫情跟领导的所作所为关系很大,败给病毒也无话可说,早早控制好不就没事了?
 
不管是民主还是独裁,只要是政权,就有国家机器的专政,就不会有绝对的言论自由,

举例:我准备宣传邪教,我准备支持希特勒。肯定不能言论自由。

关键是禁言是由独裁者决定,还是由民选政府决定。

美国独立战争,是英雄。但是本次冲击国会就是暴徒。

眉毛和胡子是不能同日而语的

这次禁言都不是民选政府决定的,是个体行为。喜欢到某家玩,胡说八道,人家主人不欢迎。
 
你怎么知道我不乖巧不为人民服务咧?:whistle:老师不在的时候,就让我站在前面看着他们上自习,谁表现不好我就批评谁:p我跟老师配合默契到根本不用说话,都是用眼神来交流的:p(呃。。。我是不是特招人烦那种啊?:X3::wdb40:
小特务
 
你应该读一下佩奇引用的美国宪法。
贴第一段判例。

Communist Party trials​

Main article: Smith Act trials of Communist Party leaders
After a ten-month trial at the Foley Square Courthouse in Manhattan, eleven leaders of the Communist Party were convicted under the Smith Act in 1949.[54] Ten defendants received sentences of five years and $10,000 fines. An eleventh defendant, Robert G. Thompson, a distinguished hero of the Second World War, was sentenced to three years in consideration of his military record. The five defense attorneys were cited for contempt of court and given prison sentences. Those convicted appealed the verdicts, and the Supreme Court upheld their convictions in 1951 in Dennis v. United States in a 6–2 decision.

Following that decision, the DOJ prosecuted dozens of cases. In total, by May 1956, another 131 communists were indicted, of whom 98 were convicted, nine acquitted, while juries brought no verdict in the other cases.[55] Other party leaders indicted included Claudia Jones and Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, a founding member of the ACLU who had been expelled in 1940 for being a Communist.

Appeals from other trials reached the Supreme Court with varying results. On June 17, 1957, Yates v. United States held unconstitutional the convictions of numerous party leaders in a ruling that distinguished between advocacy of an idea for incitement and the teaching of an idea as a concept. The same day, the Court ruled 6–1 in Watkins v. United States that defendants could use the First Amendment as a defense against "abuses of the legislative process". On June 5, 1961, the Supreme Court upheld by 5–4 the conviction of Junius Scales under the "membership clause" of the Smith Act. Scales began serving a six-year sentence on October 2, 1961. He was released after serving fifteen months when President John F. Kennedy commuted his sentence in 1962.[56]

Trials of "second string" communist leaders also occurred in the 1950s, including that of Maurice Braverman.
 

注册或登录来发表评论

您必须是注册会员才可以发表评论

注册帐号

注册帐号. 太容易了!

登录

已有帐号? 在这里登录.

Similar threads

顶部