第三集：昨天消息特别多，感觉反击开始了。 今天12点，川普律师团队重要新闻发布会

[gjw8060]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1329511192826683398

 

[ermite808]

发布会基本上都是川普律师团队正式肯定传说中的大量证据，
标志着搜集准备工作完成，正式拉开法律大战的序幕。


发布会应该是转折点， 类似于中途岛战役之于美国。
一改被动的局面： 原来川普团队不只是靠祈祷。。。

让我们拭目以待。

一改被动的局面, 怎么会呢？一直主动啊！

 

[ermite808]

笑里藏着把刀，能将对手干倒。

 

[alan_yan]

一改被动的局面, 怎么会呢？一直主动啊！

之前的法律诉讼多且乱，很多只是被偷袭后的止血措施，是被动防御。

这次发布会基本上是开始反击做恶者，守势变攻势。

 

[gjw8060]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1329516220354351105

 

[gjw8060]

之前的法律诉讼多且乱，很多只是被偷袭后的止血措施，是被动防御。

这次发布会基本上是开始反击做恶者，守势变攻势。

搜证基本结束，地方法院诉讼程序走完；
上联邦最高法院

 

[ermite808]

之前的法律诉讼多且乱，很多只是被偷袭后的止血措施，是被动防御。

这次发布会基本上是开始反击做恶者，守势变攻势。

我从来没看见你们有类似的评价-法律诉讼多且乱，多是重磅，实锤等等

 

[ermite808]

搜证基本结束，地方法院诉讼程序走完；
上联邦最高法院

那里有可爱的6比3

 

[alan_yan]

我从来没看见你们有类似的评价-法律诉讼多且乱，多是重磅，实锤等等

“你们”是谁？

 

[alan_yan]

那里有可爱的6比3

那里有宣誓捍卫宪法的大法官。

 

[Dayday-up]

现在讲话的是 Jenna Ellis 宪法律师，川普团队，高级法律顾问
说话很酷！

给你看看这个Jenna 都说过啥很酷的话：
"I could spend a full-time job just responding to the ridiculously illogical, inconsistent, and blatantly stupid arguments supporting Trump," she wrote in March 2016. "But here's the thing: his supporters DON'T CARE about facts or logic. They aren't seeking truth. Trump probably could shoot someone in the middle of NYC and not lose support. And this is the cumulative reason why this nation is in such terrible shape: We don't have truth seekers; we have narcissists."

 

[ermite808]

“你们”是谁？

trumpists

 

[ermite808]

那里有宣誓捍卫宪法的大法官。

其实就是拥有解释权。这解释权门道就大了，是不是会服务党争？

 

[alan_yan]

trumpists

有事论事，贴标签没意思。

 

[ermite808]

给你看看这个Jenna 都说过啥很酷的话：
"I could spend a full-time job just responding to the ridiculously illogical, inconsistent, and blatantly stupid arguments supporting Trump," she wrote in March 2016. "But here's the thing: his supporters DON'T CARE about facts or logic. They aren't seeking truth. Trump probably could shoot someone in the middle of NYC and not lose support. And this is the cumulative reason why this nation is in such terrible shape: We don't have truth seekers; we have narcissists."

一个变色龙的华丽转身
In one radio appearance four years ago, Ellis referred to Trump, 74, as an "idiot," adding then that he was a "typical bully" who can "dish it out, but can't take it."

On Facebook, she was even more clear in her disapproval of the then-candidate, writing in a 2016 post: "Trump's values are not conservative, but they're also not American."

 

[alan_yan]

其实就是拥有解释权。这解释权门道就大了，是不是会服务党争？

那谁来解释？ 州法院？ 州长官？

大法官即使做出有利于川普的判决，也得有判决根据是不？

 

[ermite808]

那谁来解释？ 州法院？ 州长官？

大法官即使做出有利于川普的判决，也得有判决根据是不？

川普很明白，对于同样一件事，保守派提名的大法官和民主党提名的大法官意见相左的可能非常大。所以在选举前赶紧加一个大法官

 

[alan_yan]

川普很明白，对于同样一件事，保守派提名的大法官和民主党提名的大法官意见相左的可能非常大。所以在选举前赶紧加一个大法官

我们从小就是知道，作弊不对。

更何况这种破坏民主基石的窃国指控，大家都不想搞明白嘛？

最高法院断案是透明的，做出的判决是要经历历史考验的。

这种大是大非的东西，涉及到美国的立国之本， 超越了党派之争。

 

[fierysteed]

应该赌上一局，
否则都是嘴炮

 

[阿吾]

幽默

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1329520630643953668