回复: 大律师TIM LEAHY 为全体而战,天天等法官 忍耐!
(会议上的)动议,提议[C][+to-v][+that]
The motion was carried by a majority of six.
该动议以超出六票的多数被通过。
TIM LEAHY 要阻止一刀切的动议,看来是要法官们举手表决才能通过的啊,大家耐心等待到15日吧,没准儿不用花钱打官司了,要是动议成功。
这一条是乱发言,我对TIM律师的动议没有理解清楚就误导了大家。我现在问过了,大致理解是(二把刀的理解,不保证全对,要确认这一点需要亲自问)9月15日前加入TIM律师和不加入,有很大不同。因为他的动议若是在15日通过,受益的将是加入的人,他的大案子就会关上,别的后续的不能再加入。从6月14日梁东案判决,到9月14日,决定动议通过与否,这三个月中,两个月是法院头头们在休假。
到9月15号以后,当移民部抡胳膊开始一刀切,那是另一回事,那时候,请Tim打官司跟请别的律师一样,因为都是在移民部已经正式实施一刀切之后的。6月14日以后加入李希律师与加入其它律师,目前只能说,可能相同,也可能不同,关键要看动议是否通过。
参考原句:
My motion seeks enforcement of an Agreement, which ante-dates Bill C-38. If the Court agrees with me that it has the power to do so -- and DoJ's alarm at inclusion of post-Liang litigants reveals that they know that I am correct -- he will have to decide whether to include all of our litigants or only those who joined before June 14th when Liang was issued.
If the motion is granted, the group will close. On the other hand, if it is denied, there will be no deadline for joining my group or any of the others because, as I said, it will be many, many months before the s. 87.4 decision is made.
My litigation commenced on 28 October 2011. If you check your case, you will see that you have become a part of the litigation proceeding under 、、、.