还好,马航370不是坠毁

回复: 还好,马航370不是坠毁

既然是被劫持,但不知道劫持地点。

这样,就有劫持是成功还是失败的问题,不过现在还真希望劫持者劫持成功。
 

Belge晓梦

宠辱不惊,看庭前花开花落; 去留无意,望天外云卷云舒。
回复: 还好,马航370不是坠毁

希望一个都不少! 老谋子吉言!
 

大拿

Miroir de la vie
回复: 还好,马航370不是坠毁

劫机犯只有立即公开飞机及乘客下落,否则随着时间流逝,人质中如出现伤病人员,生命安全难以保证 。。。
 
回复: 还好,马航370不是坠毁

真心希望这次不要再被否认了,:wdb14:
企盼奇迹。

 
回复: 还好,马航370不是坠毁

劫机就说明人没死吗?

这么大的飞机在哪里降落?会躲开所有的眼睛?

既然是被劫持,但不知道劫持地点。

这样,就有劫持是成功还是失败的问题,不过现在还真希望劫持者劫持成功。
现在主要的力量还是放在大海里寻找,就是说飞机最终降落在水中的可能性还是不小
 
回复: 还好,马航370不是坠毁

谢天谢地,总算是有消息了,而且是好消息,飞机只是遭劫持。飞机上旅客的亲人们望眼欲穿了吧?祝愿事态圆满解决,祝福飞机上的旅客们早日回家,上帝保佑他们!
 
回复: 还好,马航370不是坠毁

【英媒:马来民航局局长否认“已确认客机遭劫持”】英国每日电讯报报道,马来西亚民航局局长阿兹哈鲁丁否认有关确认客机遭劫持报道,称这只是他们在考虑的几种可能性之一。他说,“我在牵头调查,没人说(已确认遭劫持)……我们在调查每一位乘客和机组人员,但没有确定性证据证明遭劫持。”(新浪) 半个小时不到又被否认,好不容易有点希望,马航,你TM的是想将世界玩死的节奏啊!:wdb5:
 

Alice Liu

金牌平价地产经纪
回复: 还好,马航370不是坠毁

希望这个消息是真的,祈祷所有人都能平安回家!
 
回复: 还好,马航370不是坠毁

【英媒:马来民航局局长否认“已确认客机遭劫持”】英国每日电讯报报道,马来西亚民航局局长阿兹哈鲁丁否认有关确认客机遭劫持报道,称这只是他们在考虑的几种可能性之一。他说,“我在牵头调查,没人说(已确认遭劫持)……我们在调查每一位乘客和机组人员,但没有确定性证据证明遭劫持。”(新浪) 半个小时不到又被否认,好不容易有点希望,马航,你TM的是想将世界玩死的节奏啊!:wdb5:

不要啊,怎么又否认了?真是要把人折磨死了。:wdb7:
 
回复: 还好,马航370不是坠毁

12:58

凤凰资讯
英媒:马来民航局局长否认“已确认客机遭劫持”
英国每日电讯报报道,马来西亚民航局局长阿兹哈鲁丁否认有关确认客机遭劫持报道,称这只是他们在考虑的几种可能性之一。他说,“我在牵头调查,没人说(已确认遭劫持)……我们在调查每一位乘客和机组人员,但没有确定性证据证明遭劫持。”
 

Vanite

第十山地师师长
回复: 还好,马航370不是坠毁

安达曼群岛北端有一个属于缅甸的GREAT COCO ISLAND,上面有飞机跑道(据说跑道还很长),据说还是中国方面建造的(大型军事基地)。
 

Vanite

第十山地师师长
回复: 还好,马航370不是坠毁

Chinese Whispers: The Great Coco Island Mystery

Each time the reports were cited in books and reputable journals they gained credibility, and soon the existence of a large Chinese base o­n Great Coco Island was widely accepted as an established fact.

Throughout this entire period, Burma consistently denied that it had permitted China to establish any bases o­n its soil. The SLORC conceded that China was helping Burma to upgrade its civil and military infrastructure, but repeatedly stated that there was no Chinese facility o­n Great Coco Island. Beijing too issued formal denials, characterizing the story as a collection of unsubstantiated rumors. The Burmese government’s reputation was so poor, however, that its denials were not believed. China’s statements o­n the subject were also dismissed.

So persistent were Indian claims of Chinese bases in Burma, however, that they threatened to harm the relationship between Rangoon and New Delhi that began to gather pace in the late 1990s. In 1999, Burma’s then powerful intelligence chief, Lt-Gen Khin Nyunt, invited the Indian defense attache in Rangoon to visit any place in the country where the attache believed Chinese forces were stationed, to verify the military regime’s statements.

This invitation does not seem to have been taken up, but in a later attempt to settle India’s concerns, the regime (known since 1997 as the State Peace and Development Council, or SPDC) apparently permitted India to conduct a surveillance flight over Great Coco Island, to see for itself that there was no Chinese SIGINT base there. It is difficult to imagine such a flight being permitted if the SPDC had anything important to hide.

Finally, in August 2005, India’s chief of naval staff told reporters that he believed the Burmese when they said there was no Chinese presence in the Coco Islands. Two months later he stated categorically that India had “firm information that there is no listening post, radar or surveillance station belonging to the Chinese o­n Coco Islands.”

It is conceivable that a small intelligence collection station o­nce existed o­n Great Coco Island, but was then dismantled.
 

注册或登录来发表评论

您必须是注册会员才可以发表评论

注册帐号

注册帐号. 太容易了!

登录

已有帐号? 在这里登录.

Similar threads

顶部