全文链接：http://www.budget.gc.ca/2012/plan/chap1-eng.html
全文下载：上传N次失败，以后再说。
总的来说，前途很不乐观。由于预算案中明确了退案的对象，一旦通过，移民部就有权实行退案，而不需要通过新法案或援引C-50适用部长指引了。
关于退案的描述主要出现在Chapter 1和Chapter 3中。
Chapter 1：
Economic Action Plan 2012 will:
。。。。。。
•Return applications and fees to certain federal skilled worker applicants who have been waiting for processing to be completed.
这里只是说会对某些等待处理完成的技术移民退案。
Chapter 3.3：
对于退案细节的说明：227前的联邦技术移民申请。
•Proposing to return applications and refund up to $130 million in fees paid by certain federal skilled worker applicants who applied under previous criteria established prior to February 27, 2008.
对将来新移民体系的规划：更重视年龄，加拿大工作经验和语言
By complementing recent reforms, Economic Action Plan 2012 will enable Canada to transition to an increasingly fast and flexible economic immigration system. In the future, the Government will explore with provinces, territories and employers approaches to developing a pool of skilled workers who are ready to begin employment in Canada. To ensure that immigrants are ready to work, the assessment of educational credentials will be strengthened and the federal skilled worker point system will be reformed to reflect the importance of younger immigrants with Canadian work experience and better language skills.
对退案理由的解释：虽然已经做出种种努力减少积案，并卓有成效，但是。。。
Federal Skilled Worker Fee Refund
。。。。。。
Economic Action Plan 2012 therefore proposes to return applications and refund up to $130 million in fees, on a cash basis, paid by certain federal skilled worker applicants who applied under previous criteria established prior to February 27, 2008.
从上述表述中可以看出，预算案明确了退案对象。一旦预算通过基本上可以认为移民部得到了授权。估计这也就是康尼信心十足的原因。
对退案对象，预算案中有两个表述：
1。federal skilled worker applicants who applied under previous criteria established prior to February 27, 2008
2。who have been waiting for processing to be completed
第一点是227前旧政，没什么疑问。
第二点，已经S2了还算waiting吗？CIC的解释是没有打分的都算waiting for processing to be completed，字面上倒也说得通。但我觉得这里多少有些讨论的余地。
对于91来说，现在的希望有以下几点：
1。预算案通不过，退案条款被修改（保守党是多数政府，这个难度大）
2。预算案通过，起诉要求高额赔偿，最终逼迫CIC放弃一刀切。（这个比较可行。从预算按的文字看，退案是政府的计划，预算案通过只是国会对这个计划的认可，未必有强制性）
3。预算案通过，起诉退案条款违宪（或者违反法不溯既往原则？）
4。预算案通过，起诉S2不算waiting，已经S2的可能逃过一劫。
希望大家一起讨论。
全文下载：上传N次失败，以后再说。
总的来说，前途很不乐观。由于预算案中明确了退案的对象，一旦通过，移民部就有权实行退案，而不需要通过新法案或援引C-50适用部长指引了。
关于退案的描述主要出现在Chapter 1和Chapter 3中。
Chapter 1：
Economic Action Plan 2012 will:
。。。。。。
•Return applications and fees to certain federal skilled worker applicants who have been waiting for processing to be completed.
这里只是说会对某些等待处理完成的技术移民退案。
Chapter 3.3：
对于退案细节的说明：227前的联邦技术移民申请。
•Proposing to return applications and refund up to $130 million in fees paid by certain federal skilled worker applicants who applied under previous criteria established prior to February 27, 2008.
对将来新移民体系的规划：更重视年龄，加拿大工作经验和语言
By complementing recent reforms, Economic Action Plan 2012 will enable Canada to transition to an increasingly fast and flexible economic immigration system. In the future, the Government will explore with provinces, territories and employers approaches to developing a pool of skilled workers who are ready to begin employment in Canada. To ensure that immigrants are ready to work, the assessment of educational credentials will be strengthened and the federal skilled worker point system will be reformed to reflect the importance of younger immigrants with Canadian work experience and better language skills.
对退案理由的解释：虽然已经做出种种努力减少积案，并卓有成效，但是。。。
Federal Skilled Worker Fee Refund
。。。。。。
Economic Action Plan 2012 therefore proposes to return applications and refund up to $130 million in fees, on a cash basis, paid by certain federal skilled worker applicants who applied under previous criteria established prior to February 27, 2008.
从上述表述中可以看出，预算案明确了退案对象。一旦预算通过基本上可以认为移民部得到了授权。估计这也就是康尼信心十足的原因。
对退案对象，预算案中有两个表述：
1。federal skilled worker applicants who applied under previous criteria established prior to February 27, 2008
2。who have been waiting for processing to be completed
第一点是227前旧政，没什么疑问。
第二点，已经S2了还算waiting吗？CIC的解释是没有打分的都算waiting for processing to be completed，字面上倒也说得通。但我觉得这里多少有些讨论的余地。
对于91来说，现在的希望有以下几点：
1。预算案通不过，退案条款被修改（保守党是多数政府，这个难度大）
2。预算案通过，起诉要求高额赔偿，最终逼迫CIC放弃一刀切。（这个比较可行。从预算按的文字看，退案是政府的计划，预算案通过只是国会对这个计划的认可，未必有强制性）
3。预算案通过，起诉退案条款违宪（或者违反法不溯既往原则？）
4。预算案通过，起诉S2不算waiting，已经S2的可能逃过一劫。
希望大家一起讨论。
